Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anonymous ePetitions – Another Step Towards eDemocracy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Privacy and Identity Management for the Future Internet in the Age of Globalisation (Privacy and Identity 2014)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((Tutorials,volume 457))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 959 Accesses

Abstract

This paper addresses the possibility to implement an online petition platform which allows citizens to petition the public authorities anonymously. The advantages and possible obstacles of anonymity are discussed. We focus on the legal admissibility of anonymous petitions in Europe and Germany and conclude that all related legal requirements could be met by implementing Privacy-enhancing Attribute-based Credentials.

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement no. 257782 for the project Attribute-based Credentials for Trust (ABC4Trust).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Märker, O., Wehner, J.: E-Participation. In: Zechner, A. (ed.) E-Government Guide Germany, pp. 355–369. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deutscher Bundestag: Petition zur Veröffentlichung einreichen (2015). https://epetitionen.bundestag.de/epet/peteinreichen/oeffentlich.schritt1.html. Accessed 9 March 2015

  3. Riehm, U., Böhle, K., Lindner, R.: Elektronische Petitionssysteme: Analysen zur Modernisierung des parlamentarischen Petitionswesens in Deutschland und Europa. Edition sigma, Berlin (2013). http://www.itas.kit.edu/pub/v/2013/riua13a.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

  4. Bieker, F., Hansen, M., Zwingelberg, H.: Towards a privacy-preserving inspection process for authentication solutions with conditional identification. In: Hühnlein, D., Roßnagel, H. (eds.) Proceeings of Open Identity Summit 2014. Lecture Notes in Informatics, vol. P-237, pp. 85–96. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2014). http://subs.emis.de/LNI/Proceedings/Proceedings237/article2.html. Accessed 9 March 2015

  5. Diaz, C., Kosta, E., Dekeyser, H., Kohlweiss, M., Nigusse, G.: Privacy preserving electronic petitions. Identity Inf. Soc. 1(1), 203–219 (2008). Springer, Netherlands

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party: Opinion 05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques. WP 216. Adopted on 10 April 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2014/wp216_en.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

  7. Abendroth, J., Bcheri, S., Krontiris, I., Liagkou, V., Sabouri, A., Schlehahn, E., Veseli, F., Zwingelberg, H.: ABC4Trust D5.2a Amendment Building Blocks of ABC Technology. Deliverable of the ABC4Trust Project (2013). https://abc4trust.eu/download/ABC4Trust-D5.2a_Amendment_Building_Blocks_of_ABC_Technology.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

  8. Bcheri, S., Damgård, K.L., Deibler, D., Goetze, N., Knudsen, H.G., Moneta, M., Pyrgelis, A., Schlehahn, E., Stausholm, M.B., Zwingelberg, H.: ABC4Trust D5.3 Experiences and Feedback of the Pilots. Deliverable of the ABC4Trust Project (2014). https://abc4trust.eu/download/D5.3_ExperiencesAndFeedback_Final.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

  9. EU Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights: Commentary of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2006). http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/networkcommentaryfinal_en.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

  10. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party: Opinion 4/2007 on the Concept of Personal Data. WP 136. Adopted on 20 June 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2007/wp136_en.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

  11. Deutscher Bundestag: Nutzungsbedingungen (2015). https://epetitionen.bundestag.de/epet/service.$$$.rubrik.nutzungsbedingungen.html. Accessed 9 March 2015

  12. VG Berlin, 1. Kammer: Datenschutzrechtliche Anordnung im Fall der Speicherung von Beschäftigtendaten. Urteil vom 13. Januar 2014, 1 K 220.12 (2014). http://www.gerichtsentscheidungen.berlin-brandenburg.de/jportal/portal/t/279b/bs/10/page/sammlung.psml?pid=Dokumentanzeige&showdoccase=1&js_peid=Trefferliste&documentnumber=1&numberofresults=1&fromdoctodoc=yes&doc.id=JURE140003569&doc.part=L&doc.price=0.0#focuspoint. Accessed 9 March 2015

  13. Bundesgerichtshof: Urteil vom 1. Juli 2014 – VI ZR 345/13 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bundesverfassungsgericht: BVerfGE 2, 225 – Beschluß des Ersten Senats vom 22. April 1953 – 1 BvR 162/51 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  15. European Court of Justice: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2011. Ingo-Jens Tegebauer v European Parliament. Right to petition – Petition addressed to the Parliament – Decision to take no action – Action for annulment – Actionable measure – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons. Case T-308/07 (2011). http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=T-308/07. Accessed 9 March 2015

  16. European Court of Justice: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012. J v European Parliament. Right of petition – Petition addressed to the European Parliament – Decision to take no further action – Action for annulment – Duty to state reasons – Petition not falling within an area of activity of the European Union. Case T-160/10 (2012). http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=T-160/10. Accessed 9 March 2015

  17. Uerpmann-Witzack, R.: Artikel 17 GG. In: Münch, I., Kunig, P. (eds.) Grundgesetz-Kommentar, vol. 1, 6th edn. Verlag C.H. Beck, Munich (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deutscher Bundestag: Richtlinie für die Behandlung von öffentlichen Petitionen (öP) gem. Ziff 7.1 (4) der Verfahrensgrundsätze (Engl.: Directive on the Treatment of Public Petitions according to Nr. 7.1 (4) of the Rules of Procedure). https://www.bundestag.de/blob/190940/c0cbbd627e20fcc1519b03dc61db40f3/richtlinie_oeffentliche_petitionen-data.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

  19. Bundesverfassungsgericht: Urteil des Zweiten Senats vom 3. März 2009 – 2 BvC 3/07, 2 BvC 4/07 (2009). https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/cs20090303_2bvc000307.html. Accessed 9 March 2015

  20. Bundesverfassungsgericht: Beschluss vom 16. Juli 1998 – 2 BvR 1953/95 (1998). http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/1998/07/rs19980716_2bvr195395.html. Accessed 9 March 2015

  21. ISPRAT(Interdisziplinäre Studien zu Politik, Recht, Administration und Technologie e.V.): Stellungnahme zum Referentenentwurf der Bundesregierung eines Gesetzes zur Förderung der elektronischen Verwaltung sowie zur Änderung weiterer Vorschriften (E-Government-Gesetz) (2012). http://isprat.net/fileadmin/downloads/pdfs/20120618__ISPRAT_Stellungnahme_E-Government-Gesetz.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

  22. Klein, H.H.: Artikel 17 GG. In: Maunz, T., Dürig, G. (eds.) Kommentar zum Grundgesetz. Loose-leaf booklet. Verlag C.H. Beck, Münch (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bcheri, S., Björk, E., Deibler, D., Hånell, G., Lerch, J., Moneta, M., Orski, M., Schlehahn, E., Tesfay, W.: ABC4Trust D6.3 Evaluation of the School Pilot. Deliverable of the ABC4Trust Project (2014). https://abc4trust.eu/download/Deliverable%20D6.3.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

  24. Kellner, M.: Die E-Petition zum Bundestag: Ein Danaergeschenk. Neue Justiz 61(2), 56–59 (2007). Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krings, G.: Artikel 17 GG. In: Friauf, K.H., Höfling, W. (eds.) Berliner Kommentar Zum Grundgesetz. Loose-leaf booklet. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Cologne (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gola, P., Schomerus, R.: § 3 BDSG. In: Gola, P., Schomerus, R. (eds.) BDSG Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, 11th edn. Verlag C.H. Beck, Munich (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. DIVSI Deutsches Institut für Vertrauen und Sicherheit im Internet: DIVSI Milieu Study on Trust and Security on the Internet – Condensed Version. Hamburg (2012). https://www.divsi.de/publikationen/studien/divsi-decision-maker-study-on-trust-and-security-on-the-internet-condensed-version/. Accessed 9 March 2015

  28. DIVSI Deutsches Institut für Vertrauen und Sicherheit im Internet: Jeder Zweite möchte online wählen. Press release, 13 August 2013. https://www.divsi.de/jeder-zweite-moechte-online-waehlen/. Accessed 9 March 2015

  29. Deibler, D., Engeler, M., Krontiris, I., Liagkou, V., Pyrgelis, A., Schlehahn, E., Stamatiou, Y., Tesfay, W., Zwingelberg, H.: ABC4Trust D7.3 Evaluation of the Student Pilot. Deliverable of the ABC4Trust Project (2014). https://abc4trust.eu/download/Deliverable%20D7.3.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unabhängiges Landeszentrum Für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany

    Hannah Obersteller

Authors
  1. Hannah Obersteller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah Obersteller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IBM Research Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland

    Jan Camenisch

  2. Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden

    Simone Fischer-Hübner

  3. Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein (ULD), Kiel, Germany

    Marit Hansen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Cite this paper

Obersteller, H. (2015). Anonymous ePetitions – Another Step Towards eDemocracy. In: Camenisch, J., Fischer-Hübner, S., Hansen, M. (eds) Privacy and Identity Management for the Future Internet in the Age of Globalisation. Privacy and Identity 2014. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 457. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18621-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18621-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18620-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18621-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation