Abstract
The chapter provides an overview, brief critique, and description of how COMPASS fits within the Evidence Based Practices in Psychology (EBPP) framework. We also describe the models that guided the development and testing of COMPASS. Specifically, we describe the Ladder of Evidence, Dunst and Trivette’s (2012) implementation science framework and introduce and describe our Integrated Model. The Integrated Model starts with the consultant, teacher and student as primary actors, includes measures of the quality of the interaction between actors and incorporates internal and external resource factors impacting each actor. The Integrated Model was the primary guide for our research into understanding and testing the effectiveness, as well as exploring potential mechanisms of action and factors that underlie COMPASS effectiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285.
Baker, T. B., McFall, R. M., & Shoham, V. (2008). Current status and future prospects of clinical psychology: Toward a scientifically principled approach to mental and behavioral health care (Vol. 9). United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Barnhill, G. P., Polloway, E. A., & Sumutka, B. M. (2011). A survey of personnel preparation practices in autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26(2), 75–86.
Bohart, A. C., & Tallman, K. (2010). Clients: The neglected common factor in psychotherapy. In B. L. Duncan, S. D. Miller, B. E. Wampold & M. A. Hubble (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: Delivering what works in therapy (2nd ed., pp. 83–111, 455, xxix). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Caplan, G. (1970). The theory and practice of mental health consultation. New York: Basic Books.
Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 7–18.
Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: controversies and evidence (Vol. 52). USA: Annual Reviews.
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243(4899), 1668–1674.
Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance. (2014). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ, 63(Suppl 2), 1–21.
Dieterich, M., Irving, C. B., Park, B., & Marshall, M. (2010). Intensive case management for severe mental illness. The Cochrane Library.
Dunst, C. J., & Trivette, C. M. (2012). Meta-analysis of implementation practice research. In B. Kelly & D. Perkins (Eds.), Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education (pp. 68–91). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Raab, M. (2013). An implementation science framework for conceptualizing and operationalizing fidelity in early childhood intervention studies. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(2), 85–101.
Green, L. W. (2008). Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Family Practice, 25(Suppl 1), 20–24. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn055.
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19–30.
Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge based, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146–159.
Lambert, M. J. (2013). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Leff, S., Conley, J., Campbell-Orde, T., & Bradley, V. (2003). Getting to systems that promote self-determination through research and evaluation. UIC NRTC 2003 Self-Determination and Psychiatric Disability Conference Papers, 158–180.
Lord, C., & McGee, J. P. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington: National Academy Press.
McGrew, J., Ruble, L., & Smith, I. (2015). Current status of evidence based practice in psychology in autism: the field is only partially clothed. Manuscript in preparation.
Mesibov, G. B., & Shea, V. (2011). Evidence-based practices and autism. Autism, 15(1), 114–133.
Miles, A., & Loughlin, M. (2011). Models in the balance: Evidence-based medicine versus evidence-informed individualized care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 531–536.
Nathan, P. E., & Gorman, J. M. (2007). A guide to treatments that work (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
National Autism Center. (2009). National standards report. Retrieved March 2, 2015 from http://www.nationalautismcenter.org/reports/.
Office of Autism Research Coordination (OARC). (2012). National institute of mental health and thomson reuters, inc. on behalf of the interagency autism coordinating committee (IACC). IACC/OARC Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Publications Analysis Report: The Global Landscape of Autism Research. Retrieved July 2012 from http://iacc.hhs.gov/publications-analysis/july2012/index.shtml.
Offit, P. A. (2008). Vaccines and autism revisited—The Hannah poling case. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(20), 2089–2091.
Reichow, B., Doehring, P., Cicchetti, D. V., & Volkmar, F. R. (2011). Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Roth, A., & Fonagy, P. (2005). What works for whom?: a critical review of psychotherapy research. New York: Guilford Press.
Ruble, L., Dalrymple, N., & McGrew, J. (2012). Collaborative model for promoting competence and success for students with ASD. New York: Springer.
Sheridan, S. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2007). Conjoint behavioral consultation: Promoting family-school connections and interventions. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Tanenbaum, S. J. (2005). Evidence-based practice as mental health policy: Three controversies and a caveat. Health Affairs, 24(1), 163–173.
Thyer, B. A., & Pignotti, M. (2011). Evidence-based practices do not exist. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39(4), 328–333.
Wampold, B. E. (2006). Not a scintilla of evidence to support empirically supported treatments as more effective than other treatments. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions (pp. 299–308). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 631–663.
Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K, Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., Schultz, T. R. (2013). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruble, L.A., McGrew, J.H. (2015). Overview of Evidence Based Practices in Psychology and Implementation Science. In: COMPASS and Implementation Science. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18555-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18555-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18554-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18555-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)