Advertisement

Impact of Base Station Location on Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Odeny Nazarius KoyiEmail author
  • Hee Sung Yang
  • Youngmi Kwon
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 348)

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have attracted much attention in recent years due to their potential use in many applications such as surveillance, militant etc. Given the importance of such applications, maintaining a dependable operation of the network is a fundamental objective. In Wireless Sensor Networks, many algorithms have been devised to improve energy maintenance in a whole network. Most of them assume the location of the Base Station (BS) to be at the border of the network even though location of Base Station takes some role in overall performance of the network. So in this paper, we simulated WSN performance in energy consumption, throughput, packets delivery ratio and delay with different locations of BS. Simulation results showed the best performance when a Base Station is located in the center of the WSN field and the worst when a Base Station is in the corner of the WSN. Compared to the existing location assumption, with the best positioned BS, Cluster Heads consumed 69% and with the worst positioned BS, they consumed 127% in energy. When we build WSN, if we spend some higher cost for installing BS inside the network, its overall performance can be improved much.

Keywords

LEACH Protocol Base Station Location Energy Consumption 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Handy, M.J., Haase, M., Timmermann, D.: Low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy with deterministic cluster-head selection. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Mobile and Wireless Communications Network, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 368–372 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heinzelman, W.R., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 8020. HI, Maui (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heinzelman, W.B., Chandraskan, A.P., Blakrisshnan, H.: An Application-Specific Protocol Architecture for Wireless Microsensor Networks. IEEE Trans. on Wireless Communications. 1(4), 660–670 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akkaya, K., Younis, M., Youssef, W.: Positioning of Base Stations in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Communication Magazines (April 2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mendis, C., Guru, S.M., Halgamuge, S., Fernando, S.: Optimized Sink Node Path using Particle Swarm Optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE AINA 2006, Vienna, Austria, vol. 2 (April 2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heinzelman, W.B., Chandraskan, A.P., Blakrisshnan, H.: An Application-Specific Protocol Architecture for Wireless Microsensor Networks. IEEE Trans. on Wireless Communications. 1(4), 660–670 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Odeny Nazarius Koyi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hee Sung Yang
    • 1
  • Youngmi Kwon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Communications EngineeringChungnam National UniversityDaejeonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations