Skip to main content

On the Value of Parameters of Use Case Points Method

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 347))

Abstract

Accurate effort estimates plays crucial role in software development process. These estimates are used for planning, controlling and managing resources. This paper deals with the statistical value of Use Case Points method parameters, while analytical programming for effort estimation is used. The main question of this paper is : Are there any parameters in Use Case Points method, which can be omitted from the calculation and the results will be better? The experimental results show that this method improving accuracy of Use Case Points method if and only if UUCW parameter is present in the calculation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Keung, J.W.: Theoretical Maximum Prediction Accuracy for Analogy-Based Software Cost Estimation. In: 2008 15th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp. 495–502 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karner, G.: Resource estimation for objectory projects. Objective Systems SF AB (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, K., Shepperd, M.: Using Function Points to Find Cost Analogies. In: 5th European Software Cost Modelling Meeting, Ivrea, Italy, pp. 1–5 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Attarzadeh, I., Ow, S.H.: Software development cost and time forecasting using a high performance artificial neural network model. In: Chen, R. (ed.) ICICIS 2011 Part I. CCIS, vol. 134, pp. 18–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Boehm, B.W.: Software Engineering Economics. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-10, 4–21 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rowe, G., Wright, G.: The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting 15, 353–375 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, Z., Naudé, P., Jiang, B.: The effects of software size on development effort and software quality. Journal of Computer and Information Science, 492–496 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaushik, A., Soni, K., Soni, R.: An adaptive learning approach to software cost estimation. In: 2012 National Conference on Computing and Communication Systems, pp. 1–6 (November 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kocaguneli, E., Menzies, T., Keung, J.W.: On the value of ensemble effort estimation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 38(6), 1403–1416 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P., Prokopova, Z.: Automatic complexity estimation based on requirements. In: Latest Trends on Systems, Santorini, Greece, vol. II, p. 4 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reddy, C., Raju, K.: Improving the accuracy of effort estimation through fuzzy set combination of size and cost drivers. WSEAS Transactions on Computers 8(6), 926–936 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ochodek, M., Nawrocki, J., Kwarciak, K.: Simplifying effort estimation based on Use Case Points. Information and Software Technology 53, 200–213 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Subriadi, A.P., Ningrum, P.A.: Critical review of the effort rate value in use case point method for estimating software development effort. Journal of Theroretical and Applied Information Technology 59(3), 735–744 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Urbanek, T., Prokopova, Z., Silhavy, R., Sehnalek, S.: Using Analytical Programming and UCP Method for Effort Estimation. In: Modern Trends and Techniques in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Storn, R., Price, K.: Differential evolution-a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Technical Report TR-95-012 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Storn, R.: On the usage of differential evolution for function optimization. In: Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zelinka, I., Davendra, D., Senkerik, R., Jasek, R., Oplatkova, Z.: Analytical programming-a novel approach for evolutionary synthesis of symbolic structures. InTech, Rijeka (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Zelinka, I., Oplatkova, Z., Nolle, L.: Analytic programming-symbolic regression by means of arbitrary evolutionary algorithms. Int. J. of Simulation, Systems, … 6 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomas Urbanek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Urbanek, T., Prokopova, Z., Silhavy, R. (2015). On the Value of Parameters of Use Case Points Method. In: Silhavy, R., Senkerik, R., Oplatkova, Z., Prokopova, Z., Silhavy, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Perspectives and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 347. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18476-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18476-0_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18475-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18476-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics