Skip to main content

Optimization of Inhibitory Decision Rules Relative to Coverage – Comparative Study

  • Conference paper
Beyond Databases, Architectures and Structures (BDAS 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 521))

  • 1524 Accesses

Abstract

In the paper, a modification of a dynamic programming algorithm for optimization of inhibitory decision rules relative to coverage is proposed. The aim of the paper is to study the coverage of inhibitory decision rules constructed by the proposed algorithm and comparison of coverage of inhibitory rules constructed by a dynamic programming algorithm and greedy algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alkhalid, A., Amin, T., Chikalov, I., Hussain, S., Moshkov, M., Zielosko, B.: Dagger: A tool for analysis and optimization of decision trees and rules. In: Computational Informatics, Social Factors and New Information Technologies: Hypermedia Perspectives and Avant-Garde Experiences in the Era of Communicability Expansion, pp. 29–39. Blue Herons (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alsolami, F., Chikalov, I., Moshkov, M.: Comparison of heuristics for inhibitory rule optimization. In: Jędrzejowicz, P., Jain, L.C., Howlett, R.J., Czarnowski, I. (eds.) KES 2014. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 35, pp. 378–387. Elsevier (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alsolami, F., Chikalov, I., Moshkov, M., Zielosko, B.M.: Length and coverage of inhibitory decision rules. In: Nguyen, N.T., Hoang, K., Jędrzejowicz, P. (eds.) ICCCI 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7654, pp. 325–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Alsolami, F., Chikalov, I., Moshkov, M., Zielosko, B.: Optimization of inhibitory decision rules relative to length. Studia Informatica 33(2A(105)), 395–406 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Asuncion, A., Newman, D.J.: UCI Machine Learning Repository (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Błaszczyński, J., Słowiński, R., Szeląg, M.: Sequential covering rule induction algorithm for variable consistency rough set approaches. Inf. Sci. 181(5), 987–1002 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Delimata, P., Moshkov, M.J., Skowron, A., Suraj, Z.: Two families of classification algorithms. In: An, A., Stefanowski, J., Ramanna, S., Butz, C.J., Pedrycz, W., Wang, G. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4482, pp. 297–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Delimata, P., Moshkov, M., Skowron, A., Suraj, Z.: Lazy classification algorithms based on deterministic and inhibitory rules. In: Magdalena, L., Ojeda-Aciego, M., Verdegay, J.L. (eds.)Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, pp. 1773–1778 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Delimata, P., Moshkov, M., Skowron, A., Suraj, Z.: Inhibitory Rules in Data Analysis. SCI, vol. 163. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moshkov, M., Zielosko, B.: Combinatorial Machine Learning - A Rough Set Approach. SCI, vol. 360. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen, H.S.: Approximate boolean reasoning: foundations and applications in data mining. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets V. LNCS, vol. 4100, pp. 334–506. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Sikora, M., Wróbel, Ł.: Data-driven adaptive selection of rule quality measures for improving rule induction and filtration algorithms. Int. J. General Systems 42(6), 594–613 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stańczyk, U.: Decision rule length as a basis for evaluation of attribute relevance. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 24(3), 429–445 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Suraj, Z.: Some remarks on extensions and restrictions of information systems. In: Ziarko, W.P., Yao, Y. (eds.) RSCTC 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2005, pp. 204–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Zielosko, B.: Optimization of approximate decision rules relative to coverage. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrózek, B. (eds.) BDAS 2014. CCIS, vol. 424, pp. 170–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beata Zielosko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zielosko, B. (2015). Optimization of Inhibitory Decision Rules Relative to Coverage – Comparative Study. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B., Kostrzewa, D. (eds) Beyond Databases, Architectures and Structures. BDAS 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 521. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18422-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18422-7_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18421-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18422-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics