Abstract
Recent advances in information technology have given rise not only to alternative ways of peacebuilding but also to new methods in peace research. This chapter explains methodological strategies related to the interface between peace psychology and Internet. We first differentiate between an experimental-survey and an ethnographic-field approach to peace psychology, and then nuance the procedures for both methods. Experimental and survey approaches use the Internet primarily for data collection. Where time or human safety is of prime concern in a peace research, the Internet provides speed and anonymity, especially for participants who live in contentious and dangerous territories. Researchers can collect online survey data in various ways such as emailing the instrument directly to the respondent, inviting participants through Facebook, or setting up a website that hosts the survey questionnaire. An ethnographic-field approach to peace psychology needs to be sensitized to online political configurations in the virtual field. We elaborate on the nature of the Internet as a political space and clarify how virtual space interacts with the social realities of peace and conflict. Further, we look at how the internet caters to the needs of both the marginalized and the status quo holders. We conclude our chapter by explaining conventional and new ways by which one can collect and analyze peace data found on the Internet. Three of the most prominent research strategies are case studies; content analysis of text, videos, images, and audios; and computational social science methods like data mining and social network analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Samizdat is “system in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and countries within its orbit by which government-suppressed literature was clandestinely printed and distributed” (Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/samizdat).
References
Askanius, T. (2013). Online video activism and political mash-up genres. JOMEC Journal Journalism Media and Cultural Studies, 1–17. http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=4180637&fileOId=4180639.
Bastos, M. T. (2012). Public opinion revisited: The propagation of opinions in digital networks. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 4(2), 185–201. doi:10.1386/jammr.4.2-3.185.
Briones, R., Madden, S., & Janoske, M. (2013). Kony 2012: Invisible children and the challenges of social media campaigning and digital activism. Journal of Current Issues in Media and Telecommunications, 5(3), 205–234.
Burnap, P., Williams, M. L., Sloan, L., Rana, O., Housley, W., Edwards, A., Knight, V., Procter, R., & Voss, A. (2014). Tweeting the terror: Modelling the social media reaction to the Woolwich terrorist attack. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 4(1), 206. doi:10.1007/s13278-014-0206-4.
Carpenter, R. C., & Jose, B. (2012). Transnational issue networks in real and virtual space: The case of women, peace and security. Global Networks, 12(4), 525–543. doi:10.1111/j.1471–0374.2012.00363.x.
Chen, H., Reid, E., Sinai, J., Silke, A., & Ganor, B. (2009). Terrorism informatics: Knowledge management and data mining for homeland security. New York: Springer.
Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2010). Computational social science. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(3), 259–271. doi:10.1002/wics.95.
de Bakker, F. G. A., & Hellsten, I. (2013). Capturing online presence: Hyperlinks and semantic networks in activist group websites on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 807–823. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1962-1.
Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Magazine, 17, 37–54.
Frangonikolopoulos, C., & Chapsos, I. (2012). Explaining the role and the impact of social media in the Arab Spring. Global Media Journal: Mediterranean Edition, 8(1), 2–20.
Fuchs, C. (2008). Internet and society: Social theory in the Information Age. New York: Routledge.
Fuchs, C. (2011). New media, web 2.0 and surveillance. Sociology Compass, 5(2), 134–147. doi:10.1111/j.1751–9020.2010.00354.x.
Gladarev, B., & Lonkila, M. (2012). The role of social networking sites in civic activism in Russia and Finland. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(8), 1375–1394.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test III: Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575.
Hampson, N. C. N. (2012). Hacktivism: A new breed of protest in a networked world. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 35(2), 511–542.
Harlow, S., & Harp, D. (2012). Collective action on the web: A cross-cultural study of social networking sites and online and offline activism in the United States and Latin America. Information, Communication and Society, 15(2), 196–216. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.591411.
Harre, R., & Moghaddam, F. (2003). Introduction: The self and others in traditional psychology and in positioning theory. In R. Harre & F. Moghaddam (Eds.), The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts (pp. 1–11). Westport: Praeger.
Hearn, K., Mahncke, R. J., & Williams, P. A. (2009). Culture jamming: From activism to hactivism. Proceedings of the 10th Australian Information Warfare and Security Conference, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia.
Hodder, I. (1994). The interpretation of documents and material culture. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 393–402). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jeong, H. J., & Lee, M. (2013). The effect of online media platforms on joining causes: The impression management perspective. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 57(4), 439–455.
Kessler, E. (2013). Social media and the movement of ideas. European Judaism, 46(1), 26–36.
Kraus, B. (2014). Introducing a model for analyzing the possibilities of power, help and control. Social Work and Society, 12(1), 3–4.
Lennings, C. J., Amon, K. L., Brummert, H., & Lennings, N. J. (2010). Grooming for terror: The internet and young people. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 17(3), 424–437.
Li, W. (2013). Hacktivism and the first amendment: Drawing the line between cyber protest and crime. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 27(1), 302–330.
Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62(2012), 231–248.
Meek, D. (2012). YouTube and social movements: A phenomenological analysis of participation, events and cyberplace. Antipode, 44(4), 1429–1448. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8330.2011.00942.x.
Meyer, M. D. E., & Bray, C. W. (2013). Emerging adult usage of social networks as sites of activism: A critical examination of the TOMS and TWLOHA Movements. Ohio Communication Journal, 51(October), 53–77.
Montiel, C., Salvador, A., See, D., & De Leon, M. (2014). Nationalism in local media during international conflict: Text-mining domestic news reports of the China-Philippines maritime dispute. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 445–464.
Notley, T., Salazar, J. F., & Crosby, A. (2013). Online video translation and subtitling: Examining emerging practices and their implications for media activism in South East Asia. Global Media Journal: Australian Edition, 7(1), 1–15.
Padmanabhan, S. (2011). Hacking for Lulz: Employing expert hackers to combat cyber terrorism. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 15(1), 191–226.
Postmes, T., & Brunsting, S. (2002). Collective action in the age of the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 290–301.
Rothenberger, L. (2012). Terrorist groups: Using internet and social media for disseminating ideas. New tools for promoting political change. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 14(2), 7–23.
Sayed, N. (2011). Towards the Egyptian revolution: Activists’ perception of social media for mobilization. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 4(2 and 3), 273–298. doi:10.1386/jammr.4.2–3.273_1.
Sison, G., Pasion, P. A., & Tapang, G. (2013, December 16). Pork barrel scam: Visualizing the ties that bind. Rappler. Retrieved from www.rappler.com/nation/38526-visualizing-park-barrel-scandal-ties.
Snajdr, E. (2012). From brigades to blogs: Environmentalism online in Slovakia 20 years after the Velvet Revolution. Czech Sociological Review, 48(3), 493–509.
Solove, D. J., & Washington, G. (2008). Data mining and the security-liberty debate. The University of Chicago Law Review, 75(1) 343–362.
Stevens, T. (2012). Cyberwar of ideas? Deterrence and norms in cyberspace. Contemporary Security Policy, 33(1), 148–170. doi:10.1080/13523260.2012.659597.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Taylor, P. A. (2005). From hackers to hacktivists: Speed bumps on the global highway? New Media and Society, 7(5), 625–646.
Turel, O., Yuan, Y., & Rose, J. (2007). Antecedents of attitude towards online mediation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 16(6), 539–552. doi:10.1007/s10726-007-9085-7.
Vehovar, V., & Lozar Manfreda, K. (2008). Overview: Online surveys. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of online research methods (pp. 177–194). London: Sage.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yablon, Y., & Katz, Y. (2001). Internet-based group relations: a high school peace education project in Israel. Educational Media International, 38(2–3), 175–182. doi:10.1080/0952398011004359.
Zhang, J., & Nyiri, P. (2014). “Walled” activism: Transnational social movements and the politics of Chinese cyber-public space. International Development Planning Review, 36(1), 111–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montiel, C., Boller, A., Galvez, F. (2015). Using the Internet and Social Media in Peace Psychology Research. In: Bretherton, D., Law, S. (eds) Methodologies in Peace Psychology. Peace Psychology Book Series, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18395-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18395-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18394-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18395-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)