Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development ((AAESPD,volume 5))

  • 840 Accesses

Abstract

Among the structural theories of democratization discussed in the previous chapter, there has arisen a model of which holds that democratic transition or consolidation is improbable or even impossible without the development of a vibrant and robust civil society. According to this view, democratization is understood as a “double democratization,” a process of restructuring of state power in parallel with a certain form of restructuring or development of civil society (Held, 1987). Such arguments beg the question as to what civil society is, how it is supposed to achieve or support democratization, and what attributes and qualities civil society ought to have in order to achieve the same. In addition to introducing the discourses on the role of civil society and democracy, this chapter defines the terminologies that are commonly used in civil society literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Standing, respectively, for Business and Industry (or Big International), Business Oriented, Government Organized, Donor Organized NGOs, other abbreviations include CBO (Community Based Organization), ENGO (Environmental NGO), NGDO (Non-Governmental Development Organization), NPO (Non-profit Organization), and MONGO (my own NGO), GSO (Grass-roots Support Organization), MSO (Membership Support Organization).

References

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, C. (1997). Who needs civil society? Review of African Political Economy, 24(73), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annan, K. (1998, Jul 14). Secretary-general describes emerging era in global affairs with growing role for civil society alongside established institutions. Press Release SG/SM/6638. Secretary General.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. (1997). Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar republic. World Politics, 49(3), 401–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, M. (1994). Civil society and political transitions in Africa. In J. W. Harbeson, D. Rothchild, & N. Chazan (Eds.), Civil society and the state in Africa (pp. 51–82). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Civil Society. (2006). Report on activities (July 2005–August 2006). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. New Baskerville: Masechusets Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (1994). Rethinking civil society: Towards democratic consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaghy, M. M. (2013). Civil society and participatory governance: Municipal councils and social housing programs in Brazil. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, J. (1999). Civil society: The critical history of an idea. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encarnación, O. G. (2000). Tocqueville’s missionaries: Civil society advocacy and the promotion of democracy. World Policy Journal, 17, 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encarnación, O. G. (2001). Civil society and the consolidation of democracy in Spain. Political Science Quarterly, 116(1), 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encarnación, O. G. (2003). The myth of civil society: Social capital and democratic consolidation in Spain and Brazil. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (2006). Global shadows: Africa in the neoliberal world order. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M., & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, M. (2005). Civil society and the problem of global democracy. Democratization, 12(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2008). Development of civil society. In S. A. Binder, R. A. Rhodes, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 131–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, V. F. (2005). Studying civil society across the world: Exploring the thorny issues of conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Civil Society, 1(3), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1987). Models of democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirström, H. H. (2009). Look who’s talking! second thoughts about NGOs as representing civil society. Journal of African and Asian Studies, 44(4), 429–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (1999). Transitional civil society. In T. Dunne & N. J. Wheeler (Eds.), Human rights in global politics (pp. 195–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kasfir, N. (1998). Civil society, the state and democracy in Africa. In N. Kasfir (Ed.), Civil society and democracy in Africa: Critical perspectives (pp. 1–20). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. London: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1980). Second treatise of government. (C. B. Macpherson, Ed.) Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. R. (2001). Decent society and/or civil society? Social Research, 68(4), 1011–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K. (2002). Mission impossible? Defining nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(3), 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization, 11(5), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morera, E. (1990). Gramsci and democracy. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. (1995). From civil society to the social. British Journal of Sociology, 46(3), 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Reveiew, 22(2), 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). Civil society and aid effectiveness: Findings, recommendations and good practice. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orvis, S. (2001). Civil society in Africa or African civil society? In S. N. Ndegwa (Ed.), Decade of democracy in Africa (pp. 1–16). Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 254–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rooy, A. V. (2000). Civil society as idea: An analytical hatstand? In A. V. Rooy (Ed.), Civil society and the aid industry: The politics and promise. Sterling: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1996). International classification of nonprofit organizations: ICNPO-revision 1 1996. Working papers of the johns hopkins comparative nonprofit sector project No. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., et al. (2004). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector (Vol. 2). Baltimore, MD: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. (1997). Civil society east and west. In L. Diamond (Ed.), Consolidating the third wave democracies: Themes and perspectives (pp. 239–262). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, A. B. (1992). The idea of civil society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, M. A. (2002). The renaissance of political culture or the renaissance of the ecological fallacy? Comparative Politics, 34(3), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setianto, B. D. (2007). Somewhere in between: Conceptualizing civil society. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 10(1), 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, G. (2005). Waging nonviolent struggles: Twentieth century practice and twenty-first century potential. Boston: Porter Sergent Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tismaneanu, V. (2001). Civil society, pluralism, and the future of east and central Europe. Social Research, 68, 977–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of International Associations. (2013). Yearbook of international organizations 2012-2013: Guide to global civil society networks (50th ed., Vol. 5). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program. (2006). UNDP and civil society organizations: A toolkit for strengthening partnerships. UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Statistical Commission. (1993). System of national accounts 1993. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. (2012). The 2011 CSO sustainability index for sub-Saharan Africa. United States agency for international development bureau for Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisman, C. H. (2006). Autonomy, self-regulation and democracy: Tocquevillian-Gellenerian perspectives on civil society and the bifurcated state in Latin America. In R. Feinberg & C. H. Waisman (Eds.), Civil society and democracy in Latin America (pp. 59–71). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, T. (2004). Gandhi as disciple and mentor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. (1996). Civil society, democratization and development. In R. Luckham & G. White (Eds.), Democratization in the South: The jagged wave (pp. 178–219). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. L. (2009). Color revolutions: The view from Moscow and Beijing. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 25(2–3), 369–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ibrahim, A.M. (2015). Civil Society and Democratization. In: The Role of Civil Society in Africa’s Quest for Democratization. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18383-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics