Abstract
In a coherent text, text spans are not understood in isolation but in relation with each other through discourse relations, such as Cause, Condition, Elaboration, etc. Discourse analysis involves modeling the coherence relations between text segments which allows readers to interpret and understand the communicative purpose of text’s constitutive segments. Many natural language processing applications such as text summarization, question answering, text simplification, etc. can benefit from discourse analysis. In the proposed research project, we plan to use discourse analysis in the context of text simplification in order to enhance a text’s readability level.
I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Leila Kosseim for the guidance, encouragement and advice she has provided throughout.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carlson, L., Okurowski, M.E., Marcu, D.: RST discourse treebank. Linguistic Data Consortium, Catalog Number-LDC2002T07 (2002)
Chandrasekar, R., Srinivas, B.: Automatic induction of rules for text simplification. Knowledge-Based Systems 10(3), 183–190 (1997)
Coster, W., Kauchak, D.: Simple English Wikipedia: A new text simplification task. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp. 665–669. Portland (2011)
Devlin, S., Tait, J.: The use of a psycholinguistic database in the simplification of text for aphasic readers. In: Linguistic Databases, pp. 161–173 (1998)
Feng, V.W., Hirst, G.: Text-level discourse parsing with rich linguistic features. In: Proceedings of ACL, pp. 60–68. Jeju, Korea (2012)
Hernault, H., Prendinger, H., Duverle, D., Ishizuka, M.: Hilda: A discourse parser using support vector machine classification. Dialogue & Discourse 1(3) (2010)
Lin, Z., Ng, H.T., Kan, M.Y.: A PDTB-styled end-to-end discourse parser. Natural Language Engineering 20(2), 151–184 (2014)
Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical structure theory: A framework for the analysis of texts. Tech. rep., IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1987)
Petersen, S.E., Ostendorf, M.: Text simplification for language learners: a corpus analysis. In: Proceeding of the SLaTE, pp. 69–72, Farmington, PA, USA (2007)
Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Miltsakaki, E., Robaldo, L., Joshi, A., Webber, B.L.: The Penn discourse treebank 2.0. In: Proceedings of LREC, Marrakesh (2008)
Prasad, R., McRoy, S., Frid, N., Joshi, A., Yu, H.: The Biomedical Discourse Relation Bank. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 188 (2011)
Soricut, R., Marcu, D.: Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp. 149–156, Edmonton (2003)
Subba, R., Di Eugenio, B.: An Effective Discourse Parser that uses Rich Linguistic Information. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp. 566–574. Colorado (2009)
Taboada, M., Anthony, C., Voll, K.: Methods for creating semantic orientation dictionaries. In: Proceedings of the LREC, pp. 427–432, Genova, Italy (2006)
Webber, B.: D-LTAG: Extending lexicalized tag to discourse. Cognitive Science 28(5), 751–779 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Davoodi, E. (2015). On the Usage of Discourse Relations Across Texts with Different Readability Levels. In: Barbosa, D., Milios, E. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9091. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18356-5_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18356-5_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18355-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18356-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)