Abstract
This chapter emphasizes the reasons why lower incisors should generally not be proclined more than 2 mm since this orthodontic movement is associated with problems of health, function, stability, and esthetics. Facial movement of the teeth decreases the buccolingual thickness of the gingival tissue, which results in reduced height (recession) of the free gingival portion. In patients in whom the gingiva covering the labial of the lower incisors is thin and scalloped, orthodontic proclination of the lower incisors may cause not only gingival recession but also dehiscence. Both are examples of health problems associated with proclination of the incisors. An increase in the magnitude of the anterior open bite may occur in open-bite tendency malocclusions if lower incisors are moved labially and sometimes may even result in lip incompetence. These two are examples of functional problems associated with proclination of the incisors. There is evidence that post-retention stability of lower incisor alignment is compromised if the lower incisors were proclined during orthodontic treatment. Additionally, when the lower incisors are moved labially, facial esthetics could be compromised in pleasing facial profiles because as the teeth procline, the lips also move forward, while the chin stays back. An increase in lip protrusion could thus be associated with an undesirable appearance of a decreased chin projection and a diminished definition of the labiomental sulcus. Patient records are shown which illustrate the undesirable effects of lower incisor proclination. The contraindications for incisor proclination are discussed, and the orthodontic procedures recommended by the author to avoid incisor proclination in dentally crowded patients are shown.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Slutzkey S, Levin L. Gingival recession in young adults: occurrence, severity, and relationship to past orthodontic treatment and oral piercing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:652–6.
Bollen AM, Cunha CJ, Bakko DW, et al. Effects of orthodontic therapy on periodontal health: a systematic review of controlled evidence. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:413–22.
Wennström JL. Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod. 1996;2:46–54.
Bowman SJ. Altering the extraction decision with mini-screws. J Clin Orthod. 2011;10:42–9.
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby, Inc. USA; 2007. p. 279–83.
Ochseinbein C, Ross S. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1969;13:87–102.
Seibert JL, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. In: Lindhe J, editor. Textbook of clinical periodontology. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1989. p. 477–514.
Kao RT, Fagan MC, Conte GJ. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. CDA J. 2008;36:193–8.
Cook DR, Mealey BL, Verrett RG, et al. Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: an in vivo study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31:345–54.
Foushee DG, Moriarty JD, Simpson DM. Effects of mandibular orthognathic treatment on mucogingival tissues. J Periodontol. 1985;56:727–33.
Zachrisson BU. Orthodontics and periodontics. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, editors. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 3rd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1997. p. 741–93.
Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following non surgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13:654–7.
De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, et al. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Peridontol. 2009;36:428–33.
Olsson M, Lindhe J. Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol. 1991;18:78–82.
Wennström JL, Lindhe J, Sinclair F, et al. Some periodontal tissue reaction to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14:121–9.
Wennström JL. Lack of association between width of attached gingiva and development of gingival recession. A 5 year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14:181–4.
Proffit WR, Phillips C, Dann C, et al. Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1991;6:7–18.
Justus R. Finalización en Ortodoncia. In: Interlandi S, editor. Ortodoncia–Bases para la Iniciación. Sao Paulo: Editorial Artes Médicas; 2002. p. 533–46.
Little RM, Wallen T, Riedel RA, et al. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment—first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1981;80:349–65.
Little RM, Riedel RA, Årtun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years post-retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:423–8.
Little RM, Riedel RA, Engst ED. Serial extraction of first premolars – postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1990;60:255–62.
McReynolds DC, Little RM. Mandibular second premolar extraction – postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1991;61:133–44.
Riedel RA, Little RM, Bui TD. Mandibular incisor extraction—postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1992;62:103–16.
Little RM, Riedel RA. Postretention evaluation of stability and relapse—mandibular arches with generalized spacing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:37–41.
Little RM, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97:393–404.
Sinclair PM. Clinical implications of the University of Washington post-retention studies. Interview with Dr. RM Little. J Clin Orthod. 2009;43:645–51.
Al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman A, van’t Hof MA. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years post-retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:300–4.
Steyn CL, du Preez RJ, Harris AMP. Differential premolar extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:480–6.
Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary orthodontics. 2nd ed. Saint Louis: Mosby, Inc.; 1993.
Shearn BN, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower 1st and 2nd premolar extraction effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:351–61.
Luppanapornlap S, Johnston L. The effect of premolar extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in “clear-cut” extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:257–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Justus, R. (2015). Prevention of Periodontal Deterioration/Damage. In: Iatrogenic Effects of Orthodontic Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18353-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18353-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18352-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18353-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)