Skip to main content

Prevention of Periodontal Deterioration/Damage

  • Chapter
Iatrogenic Effects of Orthodontic Treatment

Abstract

This chapter emphasizes the reasons why lower incisors should generally not be proclined more than 2 mm since this orthodontic movement is associated with problems of health, function, stability, and esthetics. Facial movement of the teeth decreases the buccolingual thickness of the gingival tissue, which results in reduced height (recession) of the free gingival portion. In patients in whom the gingiva covering the labial of the lower incisors is thin and scalloped, orthodontic proclination of the lower incisors may cause not only gingival recession but also dehiscence. Both are examples of health problems associated with proclination of the incisors. An increase in the magnitude of the anterior open bite may occur in open-bite tendency malocclusions if lower incisors are moved labially and sometimes may even result in lip incompetence. These two are examples of functional problems associated with proclination of the incisors. There is evidence that post-retention stability of lower incisor alignment is compromised if the lower incisors were proclined during orthodontic treatment. Additionally, when the lower incisors are moved labially, facial esthetics could be compromised in pleasing facial profiles because as the teeth procline, the lips also move forward, while the chin stays back. An increase in lip protrusion could thus be associated with an undesirable appearance of a decreased chin projection and a diminished definition of the labiomental sulcus. Patient records are shown which illustrate the undesirable effects of lower incisor proclination. The contraindications for incisor proclination are discussed, and the orthodontic procedures recommended by the author to avoid incisor proclination in dentally crowded patients are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Slutzkey S, Levin L. Gingival recession in young adults: occurrence, severity, and relationship to past orthodontic treatment and oral piercing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:652–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bollen AM, Cunha CJ, Bakko DW, et al. Effects of orthodontic therapy on periodontal health: a systematic review of controlled evidence. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:413–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wennström JL. Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod. 1996;2:46–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowman SJ. Altering the extraction decision with mini-screws. J Clin Orthod. 2011;10:42–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby, Inc. USA; 2007. p. 279–83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ochseinbein C, Ross S. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1969;13:87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Seibert JL, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. In: Lindhe J, editor. Textbook of clinical periodontology. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1989. p. 477–514.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kao RT, Fagan MC, Conte GJ. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. CDA J. 2008;36:193–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cook DR, Mealey BL, Verrett RG, et al. Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: an in vivo study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31:345–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Foushee DG, Moriarty JD, Simpson DM. Effects of mandibular orthognathic treatment on mucogingival tissues. J Periodontol. 1985;56:727–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zachrisson BU. Orthodontics and periodontics. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, editors. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 3rd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1997. p. 741–93.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following non surgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13:654–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, et al. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Peridontol. 2009;36:428–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsson M, Lindhe J. Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol. 1991;18:78–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wennström JL, Lindhe J, Sinclair F, et al. Some periodontal tissue reaction to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14:121–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wennström JL. Lack of association between width of attached gingiva and development of gingival recession. A 5 year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14:181–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Proffit WR, Phillips C, Dann C, et al. Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1991;6:7–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Justus R. Finalización en Ortodoncia. In: Interlandi S, editor. Ortodoncia–Bases para la Iniciación. Sao Paulo: Editorial Artes Médicas; 2002. p. 533–46.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Little RM, Wallen T, Riedel RA, et al. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment—first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1981;80:349–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Little RM, Riedel RA, Årtun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years post-retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:423–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Little RM, Riedel RA, Engst ED. Serial extraction of first premolars – postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1990;60:255–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McReynolds DC, Little RM. Mandibular second premolar extraction – postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1991;61:133–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Riedel RA, Little RM, Bui TD. Mandibular incisor extraction—postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1992;62:103–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Little RM, Riedel RA. Postretention evaluation of stability and relapse—mandibular arches with generalized spacing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Little RM, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97:393–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sinclair PM. Clinical implications of the University of Washington post-retention studies. Interview with Dr. RM Little. J Clin Orthod. 2009;43:645–51.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman A, van’t Hof MA. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years post-retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:300–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steyn CL, du Preez RJ, Harris AMP. Differential premolar extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:480–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary orthodontics. 2nd ed. Saint Louis: Mosby, Inc.; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shearn BN, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower 1st and 2nd premolar extraction effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:351–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Luppanapornlap S, Johnston L. The effect of premolar extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in “clear-cut” extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:257–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Justus, R. (2015). Prevention of Periodontal Deterioration/Damage. In: Iatrogenic Effects of Orthodontic Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18353-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18353-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18352-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18353-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics