Skip to main content

Level Sets of the Lapse Function in Static GR

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Equations of Motion in Relativistic Gravity

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 179))

  • 1991 Accesses

Abstract

We present a novel physical interpretation of the level sets of the (canonical) lapse function in static isolated general relativistic spacetimes. Our interpretation uses a notion of constrained test particles. It leads to a definition of gravitational force on test particles and to a previously unknown uniqueness result for the lapse function. In Sect. 5, we discuss photon spheres in static isolated relativistic spacetimes and relate them to the level sets of the lapse function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    cf. Sect. 2 for a sketch of and [2] for more details on the Newtonian limit analysis of static isolated spacetimes.

  2. 2.

    This follows from the Newtonian limit analysis combined with a more detailed study of the geometry of pseudo-Newtonian gravity, cf. [2].

  3. 3.

    Our definition of gravitational force can be extended to general timelike curves that are not necessarily geodesics. These can be interpreted as test particles that are subject to not only gravitational but also to non-gravitational forces (e.g. electro-magnetic ones).

  4. 4.

    The author has some first ideas how to generalize the notion of gravitational force presented here to extended bodies. A second Newtonian law of motion for extended bodies, however, seems more difficult at the moment.

  5. 5.

    The acceleration of the test particle is induced from the Lorentzian metric \(ds^2\) and thus naturally refers to the spatial metric \(g\) and not to the conformally transformed metric \(\gamma \) because the definition of test particles relies on the “dynamics” of the spacetime. On the other hand, the definition of gravitational force uses the analogy of pseudo-Newtonian and Newtonian effects and thus should be formulated in pseudo-Newtonian terms.

  6. 6.

    However, we do assume that the lapse function exists in the first place.

  7. 7.

    See [4] for more information.

  8. 8.

    See [68] for the origins of this definition.

  9. 9.

    cf. [8] for an exposition of this analysis.

  10. 10.

    Making the same mild technical assumption as Israel [10] that the lapse function foliates the region exterior to the photon sphere.

  11. 11.

    This relationship can actually be pursued much further; it even constitutes a central tool for showing that the Newtonian limit of the ADM-mass of a static isolated spacetime “is” the Newtonian mass of “its” Newtonian limit. For more details, see [2].

References

  1. J. Ehlers, The Newtonian limit of general relativity, in Classical Mechanics and Relativity: Relationship and Consistency (Bibliopolis, Berkeley, 1989), pp. 95–106

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Cederbaum, The Newtonian limit of geometrostatics. Ph.D. thesis, Free University Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Kennefick, N.Ó Murchadha, Weakly decaying asymptotically flat static and stationary solutions to the Einstein equations. Class. Quantum Grav. 12(1), 149 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Cederbaum. Uniqueness of the lapse function in static space-times. In preparation

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Choquet-Bruhat, J. Jork Jr, in The Cauchy Problem, ed. by A. Held. General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 1. (Plenum Press, New York, 1980), pp. 99–172

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.-M. Claudel, K. Shwetketu, Virbhadra, G.F.R. Ellis, The geometry of photon surfaces. J. Math. Phys. 42(2), 818–839 (2001)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Perlick, On totally umbilici submanifolds of semi-Riemannian manifolds. Nonlinear Anal. 63(5–7), e511–e518 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Cederbaum. Uniqueness of photon spheres in static vacuum asymptotically flat spacetimes, in Complex Analysis and Dynamical Systems VI., Contemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society, (Providence, 2014) [to appear]

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Cederbaum, G. Galloway, in preparation (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Israel, Event horizons in static vacuum space-times. Phys. Rev. 164(5), 1776–1779 (1967)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla Cederbaum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cederbaum, C. (2015). Level Sets of the Lapse Function in Static GR. In: Puetzfeld, D., Lämmerzahl, C., Schutz, B. (eds) Equations of Motion in Relativistic Gravity. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 179. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18335-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics