Skip to main content

Optimal Placement of Hysteretic Dampers via Adaptive Sensitivity-Smoothing Algorithm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 38))

Abstract

Since hysteretic dampers have nonlinear restoring-force characteristics with sensitive plastic flow and input earthquake ground motions propagating random media are extremely random in time and frequency domains, the seismic response of a building structure with hysteretic dampers deviates greatly depending on the installed quantity and location of dampers. This characteristic could become a barrier and difficulty to the reliable formulation of optimal placement problems of such dampers. In order to overcome such difficulty, a new optimization method including a variable adaptive step length is proposed. The proposed method to solve the optimum design problem is a successive procedure which consists of two steps. The first step is a sensitivity analysis by using nonlinear time-history response analyses, and the second step is a modification of the set of damper quantities based upon the sensitivity analysis. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and validity of the proposed design method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adachi F, Fujita K, Tsuji M, Takewaki I (2013) Importance of interstory velocity on optimal along-height allocation of viscous oil dampers in super high-rise buildings. Eng Struct 56:489–500

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adachi F, Yoshitomi S, Tsuji M, Takewaki I (2013) Nonlinear optimal oil damper design in seismically controlled multi-story building frame. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 44(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  3. Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ) (2011) Preliminary reconnaissance report of the 2011 Tohoku-Chiho Taiheiyo-Oki, earthquake, July 2011 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ) (2012) Preliminary reconnaissance report of the 2011 Tohoku-Chiho Taiheiyo-Oki, earthquake, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  5. Attard TL (2007) Controlling all interstory displacements in highly nonlinear steel buildings using optimal viscous damping. J Struct Eng ASCE 133(9):1331–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aydin E, Boduroglub MH, Guney D (2007) Optimal damper distribution for seismic rehabilitation of planar building structures. Eng Struct 29:176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Celebi M, Okawa I, Kashima T, Koyama S, Iiba M (2014) Response of a tall building far from the epicenter of the 11 March 2011 M9.0 Great East Japan earthquake and aftershocks. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 23:427–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cimellaro GP (2007) Simultaneous stiffness-damping optimization of structures with respect to acceleration, displacement and base shear. Eng Struct 29:2853–2870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Silva CW (ed) (2007) Vibration damping, control, and design. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fujita K, Takewaki I (2012) Robust passive damper design for building structures under uncertain structural parameter environments. Earthq Struct 3(6):805–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujita K, Moustafa A, Takewaki I (2010) Optimal placement of viscoelastic dampers and supporting members under variable critical excitations. Earthq Struct 1(1):43–67

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fujita K, Yamamoto K, Takewaki I (2010) An evolutionary algorithm for optimal damper placement to minimize interstorey-drift transfer function in shear building. Earthq Struct 1(3):289–306

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fujita K, Kasagi M, Lang ZQ, Guo PF, Takewaki I (2014) Optimal placement and design of nonlinear dampers for building structures in the frequency domain. Earthq Struct (accepted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia DL (2001) A simple method for the design of optimal damper configurations in MDOF structures. Earthq Spectra 17:387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanson RD, Soong TT (2001) Seismic design with supplemental energy dissipation devices. EERI, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang JS, Lin WC, Wu NJ (2013) Comparison of distribution methods for viscous damping coefficients to buildings. Struct Infrastruct Eng 9(1):28–41

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lagaros ND, Plevris V, Mitropoulou CC (eds) (2012) Design optimization of active and passive structural control systems. IGI Global, Hershey

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lang ZQ, Guo PF, Takewaki I (2013) Output frequency response function based design of additional nonlinear viscous dampers for vibration control of multi-degree-of-freedom systems. J Sound Vib 332(19):4461–4481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lavan O (2014) A methodology for the integrated seismic design of nonlinear buildings with supplemental damping. Control Health Monit Struct (published online)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lavan O, Dargush GF (2009) Multi-objective evolutionary seismic design with passive energy dissipation systems. J Earthq Eng 13(6):758–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lavan O, Levy R (2005) Optimal design of supplemental viscous dampers for irregular shear-frames in the presence of yielding. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(8):889–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lavan O, Levy R (2006) Optimal design of supplemental viscous dampers for linear framed structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:337–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lavan O, Levy R (2010) Performance based optimal seismic retrofitting of yielding plane frames using added viscous damping. Earthq Struct 1(3):307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu W, Tong M, Lee G (2005) Optimization methodology for damper configuration based on building performance indices. J Struct Eng ASCE 131(11):1746–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez CA, Curadelli O, Compagnoni ME (2014) Optimal placement of nonlinear hysteretic dampers on planar structures under seismic excitation. Eng Struct 65:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Noshi K, Yoshitomi S, Tsuji M, Takewaki I (2013) Optimal nonlinear oil damper design in seismically controlled multi-story buildings for relief forces and damping coefficients. J Struct Eng Archit Inst Jpn 59B (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Silvestri S, Trombetti T (2007) Physical and numerical approaches for the optimal insertion of seismic viscous dampers in shear-type structures. J Earthq Eng 11:787–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh MP, Moreschi LM (2001) Optimal seismic response control with dampers. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2001(30):553–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Soong TT, Dargush GF (1997) Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  30. Takewaki I (1997) Optimal damper placement for minimum transfer functions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:1113–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Takewaki I (2000) Optimal damper placement for planar building frames using transfer functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 20(4):280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Takewaki I (2009) Building control with passive dampers: optimal performance-based design for earthquakes. Wiley, Chichester (Asia)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Takewaki I (2013) Smart system identification of super high-rise buildings using limited vibration data during the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. In: Keynote lecture at ICEAS13 in ASEM13, 8–12 Sept. Jeju, Korea, pp 118–145

    Google Scholar 

  34. Takewaki I, Yoshitomi S (1998) Effects of support stiffnesses on optimal damper placement for a planar building frame. J Struct Des Tall Build 7(4):323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Takewaki I, Fujita K, Yamamoto K, Takabatake H (2011) Smart passive damper control for greater building earthquake resilience in sustainable cities. Sustain Cities Soc 1(1):3–15

    Google Scholar 

  36. Takewaki I, Murakami S, Fujita K, Yoshitomi S, Tsuji M (2011) The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake and response of high-rise buildings under long-period ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(11):1511–1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Takewaki I, Murakami S, Yoshitomi S, Tsuji M (2012) Fundamental mechanism of earthquake response reduction in building structures with inertial dampers. Struct Control Health Monit 19(6):590–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Trombetti T, Silvestri S (2004) Added viscous dampers in shear-type structures: the effectiveness of mass proportional damping. J Earthq Eng 8(2):275–313

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tsuji M, Nakamura T (1996) Optimum viscous dampers for stiffness design of shear buildings. J Struct Des Tall Build 5:217–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsuji M, Tanaka H, Yoshitomi S, Takewaki I (2011) Model reduction method for buildings with viscous dampers under earthquake loading. J Struct Constr Eng Archit Inst Jpn 76(665):1281–1290 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Uetani K, Tsuji M, Takewaki I (2003) Application of optimum design method to practical building frames with viscous dampers and hysteretic dampers. Eng Struct 25:579–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Whittle JK, Williams MS, Karavasilis TL, Blakeborough A (2012) A comparison of viscous damper placement methods for improving seismic building design. J Earthq Eng 16(4):540–560

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang RH, Soong TT (1992) Seismic design of viscoelastic dampers for structural applications. J Struct Eng ASCE 118:1375–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of the present work is supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 24246095). This support is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izuru Takewaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murakami, Y., Noshi, K., Fujita, K., Tsuji, M., Takewaki, I. (2015). Optimal Placement of Hysteretic Dampers via Adaptive Sensitivity-Smoothing Algorithm. In: Lagaros, N., Papadrakakis, M. (eds) Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18320-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18320-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18319-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18320-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics