Abstract
National curriculum statements continue to espouse the ability to solve problems arising in everyday life, society, and the workplace as a major goal of mathematics education. But support for such high sounding rhetoric is typically weakened (or absent) when the specifics of curricula are elaborated. The epistemic fallacy relates to the conflating of ontology and epistemology – confusing the nature of an underlying reality with knowledge of it. Here the underlying reality concerns mathematical modelling as real world problem solving. It is argued that manifestations of the fallacy occur in critiques of modelling theory, in debates about the authenticity of models and approaches, and in considering whether issues concerning practice are most fundamentally a curriculum or a pedagogical matter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
International Community for the Teaching of Mathematical Modelling and Applications.
References
ACARA. (2010). Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. Mathematics: Draft consultation version 1.1.0 Australian Curriculum. Formerly available from www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Documents/Mathematicscurriculum.pdf
ACARA. (2013). Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. D12/3780: Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum – Mathematical Methods Curriculum May 2012. http://www.acara.edu.au/default.asp?id=site_search&query=mathematical+methods
Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Brighton: Harvester.
Blum, W., et al. (2002). ICMI study 14: Applications and modelling in mathematics education – Discussion document. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1–2), 149–171.
Borromeo Ferri, R. (2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. ZDM, 38(2), 86–95.
Bryant, L. R. (2011). The democracy of objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
Burkhardt, H. (1981). The real world and mathematics. Glasgow: Blackie-Birkhauser.
Burkhardt, H. (2006). Modelling in mathematics classrooms: Reflections on past developments and the future. ZDM, 38(2), 178–195.
CCSSI. (2012). Mathematics: Standards for mathematical practice – Model with Mathematics. Retrieved March 16, 2013 from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/MP4
Galbraith, P. (2013). From conference to community: An ICTMA journey – The Ken Houston inaugural lecture. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 27–45). Dordrecht: Springer.
Julie, C., & Mudaly, V. (2007). Mathematical modelling of social issues in school mathematics in South Africa. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 503–510). New York: Springer.
Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, M. Niss, & H.-W. Henn (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 3–32). New York: Springer.
Perrenet, J., & Zwanefeld, B. (2012). The many faces of the mathematical modelling cycle. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(6), 3–21.
Pollak, H. O. (1969). How can we teach applications of mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2(2/3), 393–404.
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action: A theory of human development (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Zbiek, R., & Connor, A. (2006). Beyond motivation: Exploring mathematical modeling as a context for deepening students’ understandings of curricular mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(1), 89–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galbraith, P. (2015). Modelling, Education, and the Epistemic Fallacy. In: Stillman, G., Blum, W., Salett Biembengut, M. (eds) Mathematical Modelling in Education Research and Practice. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18272-8_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18272-8_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18271-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18272-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)