Skip to main content

Sentence-Sorting Experiment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Construction Learning as a Complex Adaptive System

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

  • 760 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter tackles the issue of constructional priming and shows how L1 and L2 speakers achieve sentence interpretation. The pioneering psycholinguistic experiment conducted by Healy and Miller showed that native speakers of English relied on the matrix verb to determine sentence meaning. However, Bencini and Goldberg undermined such a claim: they used an improved version of the sentence-sorting protocol designed by Healy and Miller and demonstrated that native speakers rely on argument structure constructions as language categories to process and interpret sentence meaning. With a view to ascertaining whether Italian university learners of English were influenced by the matrix verb or by syntactic configurations in their interpretation of sentences, Bencini and Goldberg’s experiment has been replicated with bilingual subjects: the results offer insightful cross-linguistic observations following from two typologically unrelated languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/cadre1_en.asp.

References

  • Anderson, J. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98(3), 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., & Goodman, J. (1997). Grammar from the lexicon. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 197–212). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencini, G., & Goldberg, A. (2000). The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 640–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, F., Bock, K., & Goldberg, A. (2003). Do thematic roles leave traces in their places? Cognition, 9, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work. Oxford: O.U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • GĂłmez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5), 431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gries, S., & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, M., & Goldberg, A. (1999). Structural priming: Purely syntactic? In M. Hahn & S. C. Stones (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 208–211). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, A., & Miller, G. (1970). The verb as the main determinant of sentence meaning. Psychonomic Science, 20, 372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, A., & Billman, D. (1997). Event category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 638–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(22), 11850–11857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T., Foltz, P., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassaline, M., & Murphy, G. (1996). Induction and category coherence. Psychonomic Bullettin and Review, 3(1), 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J. (2002). How do Chinese EFL learners construct sentence meaning. M.A. thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • MartĂ­nez Vázquez, M. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations in a Foreign language. VIAL, 1, 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., Wattemaker, W., & Hampson, S. (1987). Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 242–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noora, S. (2009). Iranian undergraduate non-english majors’ interpretation of English structures. GEMA, 9(2), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regehr, G., & Brooks, L. R. (1995). Category organization in free classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 347–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepassi, F., & Kamyab, P. (2005). Iranian University students’ preference for verb centered vs. construction cues to sentence structure. The Asian ELF Journal, 5. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/teachingarticles.

  • Tomasello, M. (1998). The new psychology of language. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, J., & Rojo, A. (2007). On the existence of constructions in foreign language learners. In R. Monroy & A. Sánchez (Eds.), 25 años de LingĂĽĂ­stica en España (pp. 907–912). Murcia: Editum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annalisa Baicchi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baicchi, A. (2015). Sentence-Sorting Experiment. In: Construction Learning as a Complex Adaptive System. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18269-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics