Skip to main content

A Cross Cultural Comparison of Engineering Ethics Education: Chile and United States

  • Chapter
Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 22))

Abstract

This chapter describes the material covered and educational approaches used in an Engineering Ethics course designed initially for an American university, and then adapted to the Chilean culture; explains the adaptation process and how cultural differences were overcome; and reports on an assessment of learning and the evolution of students’ moral values using data collected throughout the course. Results from 53 students, all seniors majoring in Industrial Engineering at Universidad Adolfo Ibañez, are compared to two U.S. classes: “Ethics for Modeling for Industrial Engineering” at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, taught two consecutive years. The Fall 2011 class included 28 students from Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE), 88 % seniors and 12 % juniors, and the Fall 2012 class included 26 ISE students, all seniors. After taking the class, students in both cultures were more “open to change” and the ethical theories presented were applied in case studies, both those discussed in class as well as on examinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baier, K. (1993). Egoism. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 281–290). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M., Bazerman, M., & Chugh, D. (2003). How (un)ethical are you? Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M., & Moore, D. (2009). Judgment in managerial decision making (7th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, P. (1993). Indian ethics. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 43–57). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemente Díaz, M., Gouveia, V., & Vidal, M. (1998). El cuestionario de valores de Schwartz (CVS) propuesta de adaptación en el formato de respuesta. Revista de psicología social, 13(3), 463–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva, P. (1993). Buddhist ethics. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 58–68). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, M., & Eff, A. (2009). Multiple imputation of missing data in cross-cultural samples. Cross-Cultural Research, 43(3), 206–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etxebarria, G. (2004). Ayn Rand y los fundamentos morales del liberalismo [Ayn Rand and the moral principles of Liberalism]. Cuadernos de pensamiento político, 4, 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fascioli, A. (2010). Ética del cuidado y ética de la justicia en la teoría moral de Carol Gilligan [Ethics of care and ethics of justice under Carol Gilligan’s moral theory]. Revista del Departamento de Filosofía de la Práctica, 12, 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2007). The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2010). Value conflicts in computational modeling. Computer, 43(7), 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, K. R., Robbins, R. W., & Wallace, W. A. (2009). Designing educational cases for intercultural information ethics: The importance of diversity, perspectives, values, and pluralism. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 50(1), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2008). Human values, ethics, and design. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook (2nd ed., pp. 1241–1266). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. (1993). Utility and the good. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 337–346). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. (1993). Classical Chinese ethics. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 69–81). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1995). Conocimientos situados: La cuestión científica en el feminism y el privilegio de la perspectiva parcial [Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective] (Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: La reinvención de la naturaleza, pp. 313–425). Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminismo and the privilege of partial perspective. In C. R. McCann & S.-K. Kim (Eds.), The feminist theory reader: Local and global perspectives (pp. 391–403). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (2008). Gender identity and the ethics of care in globalized society. In R. Whisnant & P. DesAutels (Eds.), Global feminist ethics (pp. 43–57). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakozi, J. (2011). Ubuntu como modelo de justicia restaurativa. Un debate africano al debate sobre la igualdad y la dignidad humana [Ubuntu as a model of restorative justice; an African contribution to the equality and human dignity´s debate]. XII International Congress of the Latin American Association of African and Asian studies. Bogota, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankaras, M., & Moors, G. (2012). Cross-national and cross-ethnic differences in attitudes: A case of Luxembourg. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(3), 224–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1993). The social contract tradition. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 267–280). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. (1994). On model building. In W. A. Wallace (Ed.), Ethics in modeling (pp. 167–182). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, R. (1998–2011). Concepts and applications of inferential statistics. http://vassarstats.net/textbook. Accessed 2 Nov 2013.

  • Nanji, A. (1993). Islamic ethics. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 106–118). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’neill, O. (1993). Kantian ethics. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 253–266). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, F. (2011). Globalización y nuevas identidades culturales: Identidad de género en construcción [Globalization and new cultural identities: Gender identity under constructions]. Revista Sociedad y Equidad, 2, 66–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinsloo, E. D. (1998). Ubuntu culture and participatory management. In P. H. Coetzee & A. P. J. Roux (Eds.), The African philosophy reader (pp. 41–51). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. J. (2011). Ethics for the information age (4th ed.). Boston: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. (1993). Subjectivism. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 581–592). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, R. W., Fleischmann, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2009). Computing and information ethics: Challenges, education, and research. In R. Luppicini & R. Adell (Eds.), Handbook of research on technoethics (pp. 391–408). New York: The Idea Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego, California: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Basic human values: Their content and structure across countries. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behavior in organizations] (pp. 21–55). Brazil: Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents, and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 169–203). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Draft user’s manual: Proper use of the Schwartz value survey, version 14 Jan 2009, compiled by Romie Littrell. Auckland, New Zealand: Centre for Cross Cultural Comparisons, http://www.crossculturalcentre.homestead.com. Accessed 2 Nov 2013.

  • Singer, P., Rubio, J. V., & Vigil, M. (1995). Compendio de ética [A companion to ethics]. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (2006). Rational egoism: A profile of its foundations and basic character. In Ayn Rand’s Normative ethics (pp. 19–47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Willemain, T. (1995). Model formulation: What experts think about and when. Operations Research, 43(6), 916–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. (1993). Relativism. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 593–604). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant 0734894. The authors would also like to thank Jonathan Taylor for his valuable work on the collection, formatting, analysis, and revision of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth I. Murrugarra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murrugarra, R.I., Wallace, W.A. (2015). A Cross Cultural Comparison of Engineering Ethics Education: Chile and United States. In: Murphy, C., Gardoni, P., Bashir, H., Harris, Jr., C., Masad, E. (eds) Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18260-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics