Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Optical Sciences ((SSOS,volume 196))

  • 1366 Accesses

Abstract

Kolmogorov theory—the widely-used theory that deals with light propagation and imaging through the atmosphere—is beset by troubling deficiencies, which include dimensional inconsistences and image predictions at odds with observed characteristics. Around 1990, it became clear to astronomers that much better resolution was possible from ground-based telescopes and the lax optical tolerances prescribed by this theory were promptly abandoned. Yet, in the absence of any better theory, most people simply ignore the problems and continue using Kolmogorov theory as though it were still fully viable. Plainly, a more substantial theory is needed. The new theory described in the book fills this need. In addition to providing a more comprehensive and precise understanding of imaging through the atmosphere with large telescopes (with and without AO) the new general theory also finds applications in the areas of laser communications and high energy laser beam propagation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    No doubt the propagation portions of the theory have applications to radio waves traveling through the ionosphere (Ratcliffe 1956), but this goes beyond the envisioned scope of the book.

  2. 2.

    The philosopher, David Hume (1711–1776), an important figure in Western philosophy stated, “nothing can be proved except in mathematics; much of what we accept as fact is mere conjecture.” Arguably, mathematics is the only exact science.

  3. 3.

    Exceptions arise when there are multiple solutions, some of which may not have obvious real-world interpretations. It is usually clear when this occurs and such solutions are simply ignored.

  4. 4.

    The complex coherence factor is closely related to the mutual coherence function. As discussed in Chap. 7 (Sect. 3.8), for quasi-monochromatic light—with which we deal frequently—the mutual coherence function degenerates to become the complex coherence factor.

  5. 5.

    This resolution value is based on the Rayleigh angular resolution limit, \(1.22 \cdot \lambda /D,\) which applies to diffraction-limited telescopes with circular apertures.

  6. 6.

    Coulman et al. made extensive turbulence structure size measurements over a multiyear period at various observatory sites in France, Chile, and the USA. They consistently measured significantly smaller average turbulence structure than assumed in Kolmogorov formulations.

  7. 7.

    The father of dimensional analysis, James Clerk Maxwell (Appendix A), might have been the first to recognize the inherent problems of a formulation that is not dimensionally consistent.

  8. 8.

    The use of the lower case in r 0 could give the mistaken impression that the quantity refers to the radius of the coherence patch. In fact, the quantity refers to the patch diameter; another frequently used name for r 0 is “coherence diameter.”

  9. 9.

    Townes’ team used an 11-m baseline interferometer on Mt. Wilson to measure optical path differences over the baseline, inferring the atmospheric turbulence structure sizes from the measured differences. Their findings are contained in a number of papers, including “Atmospheric fluctuations: Empirical structure functions and projected performance of future instruments,” by Bester et al. (1992).

  10. 10.

    The word “turbulence” generally refers to chaotic variations in fluid media, such as found in the churned wake of a ship. For turbulent fields of this sort, there are usually well-defined limits to the sizes of the constituent turbulence structures.

  11. 11.

    The data were primarily obtained from images of the bright star, Vega, while it lay close to the zenith.

  12. 12.

    A relatively recent example of this can be seen in the paper by Chanan et al. (1998). With reference to Fig. 1 in that paper, image size and shape are seen to change only marginally as wavelength ranges from 0.5 to 10 µm.

References

  • Bester, M., Danchi, W. C., Degiacomi, C. G., Greenhill, L. J., & Townes, C. H. (1992). Atmospheric fluctuations: Empirical structure functions and projected performance of future instruments. The Astrophysical Journal, 392, 357–374.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Born, M., & Wolf, E. (2003). Principles of optics (7th ed., revised). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanan, G., Troy, M., Dekens, F., Michaels, S., Nelson, J., & Mast, T. (1998, January). Phasing the mirror segments of the Keck telescopes; The broadband phasing algorithm. Applied Optics, 37(1), 140–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chromey, F. R. (2010). To measure the sky: An introduction to observational astronomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coulman, C. E., & Vernin, J. (1991). Significance of anisotropy and the outer scale of turbulence for optical and radio seeing. Applied Optics, 30, 118–126.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Coulman, C. E., Vernin, J., Coqueugniot, Y., & Caccia, J. L. (1988). Outer scale of turbulence appropriate to modeling refractive index structure profiles. Applied Optics, 27, 155–160.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Danchi, W. C. (2001, December 27). Private communication. Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, D. L. (1966). Optical resolution through a randomly inhomogeneous medium for very long and very short exposures. JOSA, 56, 1372–1379.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. F. (1973). On image structure, and the value and challenge of very large telescopes. Observatory, 93, 3–8.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. F. (1990, May). Giant telescopes, tiny images. Sky & Telescope, 469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufnagel, R. E., & Stanley, N. R. (1964). Modulation transfer function associated with image transmission through turbulent media. JOSA, 54, 52–61.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov, A. N. (1941a). The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 30, 301–305.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov, A. N. (1941b). Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 32, 16–18.

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B., Hill, J. M., & Angel, R. (1991, March). The new ground-based optical telescopes. Physics Today, 44, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKechnie, T. S. (1990). Diffraction limited imaging using large ground-based telescopes. In Proceedings of SPIE, V. 1236, Symposium on Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation for the 21st Century, February 11–17 (pp. 164–178).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J. A. (1956). Some aspects of diffraction theory and their applications to the ionosphere. Reports on Progress in Physics, 19, 188–287.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tatarski, V. I. (1961). Wave propagation in a turbulent medium. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Titchmarsh, E. C. (1948). Introduction to the theory of Fourier integrals (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. N. (2003). The history and development of the ESO active optics system. The Messenger, 113. ESO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, N. J., McCarthy, D. W., & Angel, J. R. (1982). Performance of the MMT VII: Image shrinkage in sub-arc second seeing at the MMT and 2.3 meter telescopes. In L. D. Barr & G. Burbridge (Eds.), Advanced technology optical telescopes, Proc. SPIE. Eng., Bellingham, WA (Vol. 332, pp. 50–56).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Stewart McKechnie .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McKechnie, T.S. (2016). Introduction. In: General Theory of Light Propagation and Imaging Through the Atmosphere. Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol 196. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18209-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics