Skip to main content

An Approach for Intention Mining of Complex Comparative Opinion Why Type Questions Asked on Product Review Sites

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9042))

Abstract

Opinion why-questions require answers to include reasons, elaborations, explanations for the users’ sentiments expressed in the questions. Sentiment analysis has been recently used for answering why type opinion questions.Existing research addresses simple why-type questions having description of single product in the questions. In real life, there could be complex why type questions having description of multiple products (as observed in comparative sentences) given in multiple sentences. For example, the question, “I need mobile with good camera and nice sound quality. Why should I go for buying Nokia over Samsung?” Nokia is the main focus for the questioner who shows positive intention for buying mobile. This calls for natural requirement for systems to identify the product which is centre of attention for the questioners and the intention of the questioner towards the same. We address such complex questions and propose an approach to perform intention mining of the questioner by determining the sentiment polarity of the questioner towards the main focused product. We conduct experiments which obtain better results as compared to existing baseline systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fu, H., Niu, Z., Zhang, C., Wang, L., Jiang, P., Zhang, J.: Classification of opinion questions. In: Serdyukov, P., Braslavski, P., Kuznetsov, S.O., Kamps, J., Rüger, S., Agichtein, E., Segalovich, I., Yilmaz, E. (eds.) ECIR 2013. LNCS, vol. 7814, pp. 714–717. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Oh, J.-H., et al.: Why-question answering using sentiment analysis and word classes. In: Proceedings of EMNLP-CoNLL 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hung, C., Lin, H.-K.: Using Objective Words in SentiWordNetto Improve Sentiment Classification for Word of Mouth. IEEE Intelligent Systems (January 08, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moghaddam, S., Ester, M.: AQA: Aspect-based Opinion Question Answering. IEEE-ICDMW (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu, J., Zha, Z.-J., Wang, M., Chua, T.-S.: Answering opinion questions on products by exploiting hierarchical organization of consumer reviews. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Jeju, Korea, pp. 391–401 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ku, L.W., Liang, Y.T., Chen, H.H.: Question Analysis and Answer Passage Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems. International Journal of Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language Processing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-level Sentiment Analysis. HLT/EMNLP (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moghaddam, S., Popowich, F.: Opinion polarity identification through adjectives. CoRR, abs/1011.4623 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. A PDTB-Styled End-to-End Discourse Parser developed by Lin, Z., et al. http://wing.comp.nus.edu.sg/~linzihen/parser/

  10. Bu, F.: Function-based question classification for general QA. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, October 9-11, pp. 1119–1128, Massachusetts, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Padmaja, S., et al.: Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis - An Assessment of Peoples’ Belief: A Survey. International Journal of Adhoc, Sensor & Uboquitos Computing 4(1), 21 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ganapathibhotla, M., Liu, B.: Mining Opinions in Comparative Sentences. In: Proc. of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Manchester (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heerschop, B., et al.: Polarity Analysis of Texts Using Discourse Structure. In: Proc. 20th ACM Int’l Conf. Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1061–1070. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stanford sentiment analysis, http://nlp.stanford.edu:8080/sentiment/rntnDemo.html

  15. Cambria, E., Hussain, A.: Sentic Computing: Techniques, Tools, and Applications. Springer, Dordrecht (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Mining comparative sentences and relations. In: Proceedings of National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Poria, S., Agarwal, B., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Howard, N.: Dependency-Based Semantic Parsing for Concept-Level Text Analysis. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8403, pp. 113–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Björkelund, A., Hafdell, L., Nugues, P.: Multilingual semantic role labeling. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL 2009, June 4-5, pp. 43–48, Boulder (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Cambria, E., Yang, P., Hussain, A., Durrani, T.: Merging SenticNet and WordNet-Affect emotion lists for sentiment analysis. In: 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP), October 21-25, vol. 2, pp. 1251–1255 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Winterstein, G., Huang, G.-B.: Sentic patterns: Dependency-based rules for concept-level sentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems 69, 45–63 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.005. ISSN 0950-7051

  21. Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Das, D., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Fuzzy Clustering for Semi-supervised Learning–Case Study: Construction of an Emotion Lexicon. In: Batyrshin, I., González Mendoza, M. (eds.) MICAI 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7629, pp. 73–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Cambria, E., Fu, J., Bisio, F., Poria, S.: AffectiveSpace 2: Enabling Affective Intuition for Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis. In: Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Hussain, A., Huang, G.-B.: Towards an intelligent framework for multimodal affective data analysis. Neural Networks 63, 104–116 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.10.005 , ISSN 0893-6080

  24. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Ku, L.-W., Gui, C., Gelbukh, A.: A rule-based approach to aspect extraction from product reviews. SocialNLP 2014, 28 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Cambria, E., Das, D., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Enriching SenticNet polarity scores through semi-supervised fuzzy clustering. In: 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp. 709–716. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Bandyopadhyay, S., Howard, N.: Music genre classification: A semi-supervised approach. In: Carrasco-Ochoa, J.A., Martínez-Trinidad, J.F., Rodríguez, J.S., di Baja, G.S. (eds.) MCPR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7914, pp. 254–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Cambria, E., Hussain, A., Huang, G.-B.: EmoSenticSpace: A novel framework for affective common-sense reasoning. Knowledge-Based Systems 69, 108–123 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Howard, N., Das, D., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Enhanced SenticNet with Affective Labels for Concept-Based Opinion Mining. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(2), 31,38 (2013), doi:10.1109/MIS.2013.4

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sidorov, G.: Should syntactic n-grams contain names of syntactic relations. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications 5(1), 139–158 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Sidorov, G., Gelbukh, A., Gómez-Adorno, H., Pinto, D.: Soft Similarity and Soft Cosine Measure: Similarity of Features in Vector Space Model. Computación y Sistemas 18(3) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sidorov, G., Kobozeva, I., Zimmerling, A., Chanona-Hernández, L., Kolesnikova, O.: Modelo computacional del diálogo basado en reglas aplicado a un robot guía móvil. Polibits 50, 35–42 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ben-Ami, Z., Feldman, R., Rosenfeld, B.: Using Multi-View Learning to Improve Detection of Investor Sentiments on Twitter. Computación y Sistemas 18(3) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Agarwal, B., Cambria, E., Howard, N.: Common sense knowledge based personality recognition from text. In: Castro, F., Gelbukh, A., González, M. (eds.) MICAI 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8266, pp. 484–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Cambria, E., Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Kwok, K.: Sentic API: A common-sense based API for concept-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Making Sense of Microposts (# Microposts2014), co-located with the 23rd International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2014), vol. 1141, pp. 19–24. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Seoul (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Agarwal, B., Poria, S., Mittal, N., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A.: Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis with Dependency-Based Semantic Parsing: A Novel Approach. In: Cognitive Computation, pp. 1–13 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Howard, N., Huang, G.-B., Hussain, A.: Fusing Audio, Visual and Textual Clues for Sentiment Analysis from Multimodal Content. Neurocomputing (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chikersal, P., Poria, S., Cambria, E.: SeNTU: Sentiment analysis of tweets by combining a rule-based classifier with supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Minhas, S., Poria, S., Hussain, A., Hussainey, K.: A review of artificial intelligence and biologically inspired computational approaches to solving issues in narrative financial disclosure. In: Liu, D., Alippi, C., Zhao, D., Hussain, A. (eds.) BICS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7888, pp. 317–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Pakray, P., Poria, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Gelbukh, A.: Semantic textual entailment recognition using UNL. Polibits 43, 23–27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Das, D., Poria, S., Bandyopadhyay, S.: A classifier based approach to emotion lexicon construction. In: Bouma, G., Ittoo, A., Métais, E., Wortmann, H. (eds.) NLDB 2012. LNCS, vol. 7337, pp. 320–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Das, N., Ghosh, S., Gonçalves, T., Quaresma, P.: Comparison of Different Graph Distance Metrics for Semantic Text Based Classification. Polibits 49, 51–57 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Alonso-Rorís, V.M., Gago, J.M.S., Rodríguez, R.P., Costa, C.R., Carballa, M.A.G., Rifón, L.A.: Information Extraction in Semantic, Highly-Structured, and Semi-Structured Web Sources. Polibits 49, 69–75 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mishra, A., Jain, S.K. (2015). An Approach for Intention Mining of Complex Comparative Opinion Why Type Questions Asked on Product Review Sites. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9042. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18116-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18117-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics