Abstract
Computing miniaturization, communication networks and smart devices decentralise manufacturing. Various propositions of novel ICT continue to push virtualizations and atomisation of resources, so manufacturing increasingly relies on smart autonomous units enforcing a number of unexpected manufacturing network principles. Hierarchical set ups with command and control structures become outdated; they are replaced by bottom up (self-) configuring versatile networks, as proposed by Distributed Manufacturing. Distributed Manufacturing has impact on a number of manufacturing fundamentals, as the approach is about to generalise distributed automation to manufacturing industry in total. Matching manufacturing fundamentals with the latest ICT achievements irrefutably confirms Cyber Physical Systems (CPS), machine to machine (M2M), RFID and Cloud computing solutions as utmost adequate technology for highly efficient manufacturing processes and cutting edge factory solutions. Especially, real time data and item localisation are changing the game and laying ground for iterative intelligent decision-making and for gradual manufacturing network (re-)configurations. All these developments are additionally flanked by coalescing technology fields, as new materials and nanotechnology, underpinning the dynamics of interdisciplinarity in manufacturing. Smart units in manufacturing are now able to absorb the intelligence, which has been already displayed in distributed industrial automation, for implementations in comprehensive industrial manufacturing contexts. An adequate framework to capture all aspects has to consist of a set of interacting formal models that include both, the real manufacturing objects as well as their virtualisations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Technologies for realizing IoT devices have already been around for years, and have been standardized by the IETF, starting from the lower layers of the stack and moving up. Today, we have IPv6 as a foundation running over links such as those found in mobile networks (2G, 3G and LTE) as well as low power local area sensor networks such as IEEE 802.15.4/6LoWPAN and EPICS. The implementation can be based on multiple agent languages and platforms (JADE, JADEX, LEAP, MAPS) on heterogeneous computing systems (computers, smartphones, sensor nodes).
- 2.
In 2008, an open group of companies launched the IPSO Alliance to promote the use of Internet Protocol (IP) in networks of “smart objects” (http://www.ipv6forum.com/index.php.) As different definitions of IoT do currently exist, for manufacturing purposes it is useful to refer to IoT as a loosely coupled and decentralized system of smart objects (SOs), which are autonomous physical/digital objects augmented with sensing/actuating, positioning, processing, and networking capabilities.
- 3.
ZigBee Home Automation is the industry leading global standard helping to create smarter homes that enhance comfort, convenience, security and energy management for the consumer. It appears to be the technology of choice for world-leading service providers, installers and retailers, http://www.zigbee.org/.
- 4.
The applications of M2M communications extraordinarily depend on many technologies across multiple industries. The technical standardizations for M2M are proceeding in 3GPP, IEEE, TIA, and ETSI. The ETSI drafting standards for information and communications technologies consider an M2M network as a five-part structure http://www.etsi.org/website/homepage.aspx.
-
(1)
Devices, usually are embedded in a smart device to reply to requests or send data.
-
(2)
Gateway, acts as an entrance to another network. It provides device inter-working and inter-connection.
-
(3)
M2M area network, furnishes connection between all kinds of intelligent devices and gateways.
-
(4)
Communication networks, achieve connections between gateways and applications.
-
(5)
Applications and services pass data through various application services and are used by the specific business-processing engines. Software agents analyze data, take action and report data.
-
(1)
References
Adelstein F, Gupta SKS, Richard GG et al (2005) Fundamentals of mobile and pervasive computing. McGraw-Hill, New York
Buyya R, Yeo CS, Venugopal S (2008) Market oriented cloud computing: vision, hype, and reality for delivering it services as computing utilities, CoRR
CERP-IoT (2009) Internet of things strategic research roadmap 15 SEPTEMBER, CERP-IoT, SRA Information Desk European Commission—Information Society and Media DG
Chan C, Chow H, Siu W et al (2012), A multi-agent-based RFID framework for smart-object applications IMECS, Hongkong
Chen M, Leung V, Huang X et al (2011) Recent advances in sensor integration. Int J Sens Netw 9(1):1–2
Derler P, Lee E A, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A (2012) Modeling cyber-physical systems. Proc IEEE (special issue on CPS, Ptolemy Project) 100(1):13–28
Eguchi A, Thompson C (2011) Smart objects in a virtual world. Int J Comput Inf Syst Ind Manage Appl 3. ISSN 2150-7988
Ferguson GT (2002) Have your objects call my objects. Harvard Bus Rev 80(6):138–144
GE (2012). http://files.gereports.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ge-industrial-internet-vision-paper.pdf
Kortuem G, Kawsar F, Fitton D et al (2010) Smart objects as building blocks for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Comput 14(1):44–51
Kuehnle H (ed) (2010) Distributed manufacturing—paradigms, concepts, solutions and examples. Springer, London
Kuehnle H (2012) Towards production network (PN) theory: contributions from systems of models, concurrent enterprising and distributed manufacturing. Int J E-Bus Dev 2(2):53–61
Kuehnle H, Peschke J (2007) Agent technology and RFID for distributed production simulation and control. In Proceedings of the 14th international EurOMA conference operations management and the new economy. Bilkent University, Ankara, ISBN 978-975-609023-7
Langheinrich M, Mattern F, Römer K (2000) First steps towards an event-based infrastructure for smart things. In: Ubiquitous computing workshop (PACT 2000), Philadelphia
Lee EA (2008) Cyber physical systems: design challenges. In: ISORC’08, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE symposium on object oriented real-time distributed computing. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp 363–369
Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3(2015):18–23
Lu R, Li X, Liang X (2011) GRS: the green, reliability, and security of emerging machine to machine communications. IEEE Commun Mag 49(4):28–35
Macia-Perez F, Berna-Martinez J-V, Marcos-Jorquera D et al (2012) A new paradigm: cloud agile manufacturing. Int J Adv Sci Technol 45:47
Meier M, Seidelmann J, Mezgár I (2010) ManuCloud: the next-generation manufacturing as a service environment. Eur Res Consortium Inf Math News 2010:33–34
Michniewicz J, Reinhart G (2014) Cyber-physical robotics—automated analysis, programming and configuration of robot cells based on cyber-physical-systems. Procedia Technol 15(2014):567–576
Ming Z, Chunyang H (2013) Research and realization of resource cloud encapsulation in cloud manufacturing. IJCSI Int J Comput Sci Issues 10(Issue 1 No 3)
Monostori L (2014) Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP 17:9–13
NIST (2011) NIST cloud computing reference architecture, Special Publication 500-292
Open China ICT (2013) European Commission, Document Number D2.1-European Roadmap Survey
Pallot M, Daras P, Richir S et al (2012) 3D-LIVE: live interactions through 3D visual environments. In: Proceedings of the 2012 virtual reality international conference (VRIC’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA
Ptolemy (2013). http://CyberPhysicalSystems.org/CPSConceptMap.xml
Satyanarayanan M (2002) A catalyst for mobile and ubiquitous computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput 1(1):2–5
Sztipanovits J (2007) Composition of cyber-physical systems In: Engineering of computer-based systems, ECBS’07, 14th Annual IEEE international conference and workshops, pp 3–6
Sztipanovits J, Koutsoukos X, Karsai G et al (2012) Toward a science of cyber–physical system integration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol 100, IEEE No. 1
VDI/VDE (2013) Thesen und Handlungsfelder, Cyber-Physical Systems: Chancen und Nutzen aus Sicht der Automation, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. VDI/VDE-Gesellschaft Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik (GMA), April
Wan J, Chen M, Xia F et al (2013) From machine-to-machine communications towards cyber-physical systems. ComSIS 10(3)
Wan J, Li D, Zou C et al (2012) M2M communications for smart city: an event-based architecture. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international conference on computer and information technology, Chengdu, China, pp 895–900
Wolf W (2009) Cyber-physical systems. Computer 42(3):88–89
Wu D, Greer M-J, Rosen DW et al (2013) Cloud manufacturing: strategic vision and state-of-the-art. J Manuf Syst 5/2013
Wu D, Lane JT, Rosen DW et al (2012) Towards a cloud-based design and manufacturing paradigm: looking backward, looking forward. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2012 international design engineering technical conference and computers and information in engineering conference IDETC/CIE 2012, 12–15 August, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Yang HCh (2010) Cloud manufacturing is a manufacturing service. China Manuf Inf 39(2):22–23
Zhang L, Luo Y, Tao F et al (2010) Key technologies for the construction of manufacturing cloud. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 16(11):2510–2520
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kühnle, H., Bitsch, G. (2015). Description of the Working Field. In: Foundations & Principles of Distributed Manufacturing. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18078-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18078-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18077-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18078-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)