Skip to main content

Description of the Working Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foundations & Principles of Distributed Manufacturing

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

  • 1585 Accesses

Abstract

Computing miniaturization, communication networks and smart devices decentralise manufacturing. Various propositions of novel ICT continue to push virtualizations and atomisation of resources, so manufacturing increasingly relies on smart autonomous units enforcing a number of unexpected manufacturing network principles. Hierarchical set ups with command and control structures become outdated; they are replaced by bottom up (self-) configuring versatile networks, as proposed by Distributed Manufacturing. Distributed Manufacturing has impact on a number of manufacturing fundamentals, as the approach is about to generalise distributed automation to manufacturing industry in total. Matching manufacturing fundamentals with the latest ICT achievements irrefutably confirms Cyber Physical Systems (CPS), machine to machine (M2M), RFID and Cloud computing solutions as utmost adequate technology for highly efficient manufacturing processes and cutting edge factory solutions. Especially, real time data and item localisation are changing the game and laying ground for iterative intelligent decision-making and for gradual manufacturing network (re-)configurations. All these developments are additionally flanked by coalescing technology fields, as new materials and nanotechnology, underpinning the dynamics of interdisciplinarity in manufacturing. Smart units in manufacturing are now able to absorb the intelligence, which has been already displayed in distributed industrial automation, for implementations in comprehensive industrial manufacturing contexts. An adequate framework to capture all aspects has to consist of a set of interacting formal models that include both, the real manufacturing objects as well as their virtualisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Technologies for realizing IoT devices have already been around for years, and have been standardized by the IETF, starting from the lower layers of the stack and moving up. Today, we have IPv6 as a foundation running over links such as those found in mobile networks (2G, 3G and LTE) as well as low power local area sensor networks such as IEEE 802.15.4/6LoWPAN and EPICS. The implementation can be based on multiple agent languages and platforms (JADE, JADEX, LEAP, MAPS) on heterogeneous computing systems (computers, smartphones, sensor nodes).

  2. 2.

    In 2008, an open group of companies launched the IPSO Alliance to promote the use of Internet Protocol (IP) in networks of “smart objects” (http://www.ipv6forum.com/index.php.) As different definitions of IoT do currently exist, for manufacturing purposes it is useful to refer to IoT as a loosely coupled and decentralized system of smart objects (SOs), which are autonomous physical/digital objects augmented with sensing/actuating, positioning, processing, and networking capabilities.

  3. 3.

    ZigBee Home Automation is the industry leading global standard helping to create smarter homes that enhance comfort, convenience, security and energy management for the consumer. It appears to be the technology of choice for world-leading service providers, installers and retailers, http://www.zigbee.org/.

  4. 4.

    The applications of M2M communications extraordinarily depend on many technologies across multiple industries. The technical standardizations for M2M are proceeding in 3GPP, IEEE, TIA, and ETSI. The ETSI drafting standards for information and communications technologies consider an M2M network as a five-part structure http://www.etsi.org/website/homepage.aspx.

    1. (1)

      Devices, usually are embedded in a smart device to reply to requests or send data.

    2. (2)

      Gateway, acts as an entrance to another network. It provides device inter-working and inter-connection.

    3. (3)

      M2M area network, furnishes connection between all kinds of intelligent devices and gateways.

    4. (4)

      Communication networks, achieve connections between gateways and applications.

    5. (5)

      Applications and services pass data through various application services and are used by the specific business-processing engines. Software agents analyze data, take action and report data.

References

  • Adelstein F, Gupta SKS, Richard GG et al (2005) Fundamentals of mobile and pervasive computing. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyya R, Yeo CS, Venugopal S (2008) Market oriented cloud computing: vision, hype, and reality for delivering it services as computing utilities, CoRR

    Google Scholar 

  • CERP-IoT (2009) Internet of things strategic research roadmap 15 SEPTEMBER, CERP-IoT, SRA Information Desk European Commission—Information Society and Media DG

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan C, Chow H, Siu W et al (2012), A multi-agent-based RFID framework for smart-object applications IMECS, Hongkong

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Leung V, Huang X et al (2011) Recent advances in sensor integration. Int J Sens Netw 9(1):1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derler P, Lee E A, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A (2012) Modeling cyber-physical systems. Proc IEEE (special issue on CPS, Ptolemy Project) 100(1):13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi A, Thompson C (2011) Smart objects in a virtual world. Int J Comput Inf Syst Ind Manage Appl 3. ISSN 2150-7988

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson GT (2002) Have your objects call my objects. Harvard Bus Rev 80(6):138–144

    Google Scholar 

  • GE (2012). http://files.gereports.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ge-industrial-internet-vision-paper.pdf

  • Kortuem G, Kawsar F, Fitton D et al (2010) Smart objects as building blocks for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Comput 14(1):44–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehnle H (ed) (2010) Distributed manufacturing—paradigms, concepts, solutions and examples. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehnle H (2012) Towards production network (PN) theory: contributions from systems of models, concurrent enterprising and distributed manufacturing. Int J E-Bus Dev 2(2):53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehnle H, Peschke J (2007) Agent technology and RFID for distributed production simulation and control. In Proceedings of the 14th international EurOMA conference operations management and the new economy. Bilkent University, Ankara, ISBN 978-975-609023-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Langheinrich M, Mattern F, Römer K (2000) First steps towards an event-based infrastructure for smart things. In: Ubiquitous computing workshop (PACT 2000), Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee EA (2008) Cyber physical systems: design challenges. In: ISORC’08, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE symposium on object oriented real-time distributed computing. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp 363–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3(2015):18–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu R, Li X, Liang X (2011) GRS: the green, reliability, and security of emerging machine to machine communications. IEEE Commun Mag 49(4):28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macia-Perez F, Berna-Martinez J-V, Marcos-Jorquera D et al (2012) A new paradigm: cloud agile manufacturing. Int J Adv Sci Technol 45:47

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier M, Seidelmann J, Mezgár I (2010) ManuCloud: the next-generation manufacturing as a service environment. Eur Res Consortium Inf Math News 2010:33–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Michniewicz J, Reinhart G (2014) Cyber-physical robotics—automated analysis, programming and configuration of robot cells based on cyber-physical-systems. Procedia Technol 15(2014):567–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming Z, Chunyang H (2013) Research and realization of resource cloud encapsulation in cloud manufacturing. IJCSI Int J Comput Sci Issues 10(Issue 1 No 3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Monostori L (2014) Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP 17:9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIST (2011) NIST cloud computing reference architecture, Special Publication 500-292

    Google Scholar 

  • Open China ICT (2013) European Commission, Document Number D2.1-European Roadmap Survey

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallot M, Daras P, Richir S et al (2012) 3D-LIVE: live interactions through 3D visual environments. In: Proceedings of the 2012 virtual reality international conference (VRIC’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ptolemy (2013). http://CyberPhysicalSystems.org/CPSConceptMap.xml

  • Satyanarayanan M (2002) A catalyst for mobile and ubiquitous computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput 1(1):2–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztipanovits J (2007) Composition of cyber-physical systems In: Engineering of computer-based systems, ECBS’07, 14th Annual IEEE international conference and workshops, pp 3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztipanovits J, Koutsoukos X, Karsai G et al (2012) Toward a science of cyber–physical system integration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol 100, IEEE No. 1

    Google Scholar 

  • VDI/VDE (2013) Thesen und Handlungsfelder, Cyber-Physical Systems: Chancen und Nutzen aus Sicht der Automation, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. VDI/VDE-Gesellschaft Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik (GMA), April

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan J, Chen M, Xia F et al (2013) From machine-to-machine communications towards cyber-physical systems. ComSIS 10(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan J, Li D, Zou C et al (2012) M2M communications for smart city: an event-based architecture. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international conference on computer and information technology, Chengdu, China, pp 895–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf W (2009) Cyber-physical systems. Computer 42(3):88–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu D, Greer M-J, Rosen DW et al (2013) Cloud manufacturing: strategic vision and state-of-the-art. J Manuf Syst 5/2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu D, Lane JT, Rosen DW et al (2012) Towards a cloud-based design and manufacturing paradigm: looking backward, looking forward. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2012 international design engineering technical conference and computers and information in engineering conference IDETC/CIE 2012, 12–15 August, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang HCh (2010) Cloud manufacturing is a manufacturing service. China Manuf Inf 39(2):22–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Luo Y, Tao F et al (2010) Key technologies for the construction of manufacturing cloud. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 16(11):2510–2520

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermann Kühnle .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kühnle, H., Bitsch, G. (2015). Description of the Working Field. In: Foundations & Principles of Distributed Manufacturing. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18078-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18078-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18077-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18078-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics