Skip to main content

Nonpenetrating Glaucoma Surgery

  • Chapter
Book cover Advanced Glaucoma Surgery

Part of the book series: Essentials in Ophthalmology ((ESSENTIALS))

  • 1017 Accesses

Abstract

Trabeculectomy was introduced in the 1960s and it quickly became the standard of care for glaucoma filtering procedures. However, despite numerous advances and modifications, reproducibility of trabeculectomy outcomes remains unsatisfactory with regards to intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering. Furthermore, sudden decompression of the eye occurs upon penetration of the anterior chamber which yields a relatively high risk of early postoperative complications such as overfiltration, hypotony, and choroidal detachment. The need to develop safer and more reliable surgical techniques led to a revival of Krasnov’s concept of nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery (NPGS), in which aqueous is allowed to filter into the subconjunctival space without the removal of a full-thickness block of trabecular tissue. NPGS is efficient at lowering IOP and carries the advantage of a superior safety profile when compared to conventional trabeculectomy. This low complication rate makes it the first choice in many indications especially in young patients. The most widely practised nonpenetrating surgical procedures for glaucoma are viscocanalostomy and deep sclerectomy. Each procedure involves a different level of partial-thickness surgical dissection into the eye’s natural filtration tissues. All these variants require a long and flat learning curve that is still the main cause of its lack of popularity among eye surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krasnov MM. Sinusotomy in glaucoma. Vestn Oftalmol. 1964;77:37–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krasnov MM. Externalization of Schlemm’s canal (sinusotomy) in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1968;52:157.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugar HS. Experimental trabeculectomy in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1961;51:623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66:673–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimmerman TJ, Kooner KS, Ford VJ, et al. Trabeculectomy vs. nonpenetrating trabeculectomy: a retrospective study of two procedures in phakic patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1984;15:734–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arenas E. Trabeculectomy ab-externo. Highlights Ophthalmol. 1991;19:59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roy S, Mermoud A. Deep sclerectomy. In: Shaarawy T, Sherwood M, Hitchings R, Crowston J, editors. Glaucoma, volume 2: surgical management—expert consult—online and print. 1 Har/Pscth ed. Liverpool: Saunders; 2009. p. 295–313.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kozlov V, Bagrov S, Anisimova S, et al. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with collagen. Eye Microsurg. 1990;3:44–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stegmann R, Pienaar A, Miller D. Viscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma in black African patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:316–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, et al. Deep sclerectomy: results with and without collagen implant. Int Ophthalmol. 1996;20:157–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bissig A, Rivier D, Zaninetti M, et al. Ten years follow-up after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:680–6. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e318182ed9e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiou AG, Mermoud A, Underdahl JP, Schnyder CC. An ultrasound biomicroscopic study of eyes after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:746–50. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)94033-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaarawy T, Mansouri K, Schnyder C, et al. Long-term results of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1225–31. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.10.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sourdille P, Santiago PY, Villain F, et al. Reticulated hyaluronic acid implant in nonperforating trabecular surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:332–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sourdille P, Santiago PY, Ducournau Y. Non-perforating surgery of the trabeculum with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant: why, how, what results? J Fr Ophtalmol. 1999;22:794–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiermann A, Zeitz O, Jochim E, et al. A comparison between absorbable and non-resorbable scleral implants in deep sclerectomy (T-Flux and SK-Gel). Ophthalmologe. 2007;104:409–14. doi:10.1007/s00347-007-1520-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Galassi F, Giambene B. Deep sclerectomy with SkGel implant: 5-year results. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:52–6. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180d0a885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roy S, Thi HD, Feusier M, Mermoud A. Crosslinked sodium hyaluronate implant in deep sclerectomy for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22:70–6. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ateş H, Uretmen O, Andaç K, Azarsiz SS. Deep sclerectomy with a nonabsorbable implant (T-Flux): preliminary results. Can J Ophthalmol. 2003;38:482–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravinet E, Bovey E, Mermoud A. T-Flux implant versus Healon GV in deep sclerectomy. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:46–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jungkim S, Gibran SK, Khan K, Murray A. External trabeculectomy with T-Flux implant. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006;16:416–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmerman TJ, Kooner KS, Ford VJ, et al. Effectiveness of nonpenetrating trabeculectomy in aphakic patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1984;15:44–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tamm ER, Carassa RG, Albert DM, et al. Viscocanalostomy in rhesus monkeys. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1826–38. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.12.1826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carassa RG, Bettin P, Fiori M, Brancato R. Viscocanalostomy: a pilot study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1998;8:57–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Negri-Aranguren I, Croxatto O, Grigera DE. Midterm ultrasound biomicroscopy findings in eyes with successful viscocanalostomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:752–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cameron B, Field M, Ball S, Kearney J. Circumferential viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal with a flexible microcannula during non-penetrating glaucoma surgery. Digit J Ophthalmol 2006; 12

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, et al. Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults: interim clinical study analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1217–26. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R. Comparing two tensioning suture sizes for 360 degrees viscocanalostomy (canaloplasty): a randomized controlled trial. Eye (Lond). 2010;24:1220–6. doi:10.1038/eye.2009.317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Traverso CE, Murialdo U, Di Lorenzo G, et al. Photoablative filtration surgery with the excimer laser for primary open-angle glaucoma: a pilot study. Int Ophthalmol. 1992;16:363–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Argento C, Sanseau AC, Badoza D, Casiraghi J. Deep sclerectomy with a collagen implant using the excimer laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:504–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maldonado-Bas A, Maldonado-Junyent A. Filtering glaucoma surgery using an excimer laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1402–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vergés C, Llevat E, Bardavio J. Laser-assisted deep sclerectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:758–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pallikaris IG, Kozobolis VP, Christodoulakis EV. Erbium:YAG laser deep sclerectomy: an alternative approach to glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2003;34:375–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Klink T, Schlunck G, Lieb WE, et al. Long-term results of Erbium YAG-laser-assisted deep sclerectomy. Eye (Lond). 2008;22:370–4. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702641.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Assia EI, Rotenstreich Y, Barequet IS, et al. Experimental studies on nonpenetrating filtration surgery using the CO2 laser. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:847–54. doi:10.1007/s00417-006-0413-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ton Y, Geffen N, Kidron D, et al. CO2 laser-assisted sclerectomy surgery part I: concept and experimental models. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:135–40. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820e2ccd.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Skaat A, Goldenfeld M, Cotlear D, Melamed S. CO2 laser-assisted deep sclerectomy in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2014;23:179–84. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182707406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Geffen N, Ton Y, Degani J, Assia EI. CO2 laser-assisted sclerectomy surgery, part II: multicenter clinical preliminary study. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:193–8. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f7b14f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vaudaux J, Uffer S, Mermoud A. Aqueous dynamics after deep sclerectomy: in vitro study. Ophthalmic Pract. 1998;16:204–9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rossier A, Uffer S, Mermoud A. Aqueous dynamics in experimental abexternotrabeculectomy. Ophthalmic Res. 2000;32:165–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hamard P, Valtot F, Sourdille P, et al. Confocal microscopic examination of trabecular meshwork removed during abexternotrabeculectomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1046–52.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Johnson DH, Johnson M. How does nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery work? Aqueous outflow resistance and glaucoma surgery. J Glaucoma. 2001;10:55–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Marchini G, Marraffa M, Brunelli C, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy and intraocular-pressure-lowering mechanisms of deep sclerectomy with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:507–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yarangümeli A, Güreser S, Köz ÖG, et al. Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in patients with bilateral high-tension glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2004;25:207–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Park M, Tanito M, Nishikawa M, Chihara E. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of intrascleral lake after viscocanalostomy and cataract surgery. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:472–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kazakova D, Roters S, Schnyder CC, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy images: long-term results after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:918–23. doi:10.1007/s00417-002-0567-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Delarive T, Rossier A, Rossier S, et al. Aqueous dynamic and histological findings after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in an animal model. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1340–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Roy S, Boldea R, Perez D, et al. Aqueous outflow pathway imaging in the rabbit with fluorescein and indocyanine green. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2000;216:305–8. doi:10.1055/s-2000-10989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Roy S, Boldea R, Nguyen C, et al. Analysis of filtration according to implant type after deep sclerectomy in the rabbit. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2001;218:354–9. doi:10.1055/s-2001-15899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Roters S, Lüke C, Jonescu-Cuypers CP, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy and its value in predicting the long term outcome of viscocanalostomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:997–1001. doi:10.1136/bjo.86.9.997.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. AGIS (Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study) Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study: 8. Risk of cataract formation after trabeculectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1771–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Adelman RA, Brauner SC, Afshari NA, Grosskreutz CL. Cataract formation after initial trabeculectomy in young patients. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:625–9. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01769-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cheng J, Ma X, Wei R. Efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery for open angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J. 2004;117:1006–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Konstas AGP, Tsironi S, Ritch R. Current concepts in the pathogenesis and management of exfoliation syndrome and exfoliative glaucoma. Compr Ophthalmol Update. 2006;7:131–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Drolsum L. Longterm follow-up after deep sclerectomy in patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:502–6. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00674.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mermoud A, Karlen ME, Schnyder CC, et al. Nd: yaggoniopuncture after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30:120–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hamel M, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A. Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in patients with glaucoma and high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1410–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bellows AR, Johnstone MA. Surgical management of chronic glaucoma in aphakia. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:807–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kirwan C, O’Keefe M. Paediatric aphakic glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:734–9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00733.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tixier J, Dureau P, Becquet F, Dufier JL. Deep sclerectomy in congenital glaucoma. Preliminary results. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1999;22:545–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Krzywicki S, Szała E. Non-perforating deep sclerectomy ab externo with intrascleral implant in juvenile glaucoma. Klin Oczna. 2002;104:222–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Noureddin BN, El-Haibi CP, Cheikha A, Bashshur ZF. Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculotomy ab externo in primary congenital glaucoma: 1-year follow-up of a prospective controlled pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1281–5. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.096388.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Stangos AN, Whatham AR, Sunaric-Megevand G. Primary viscocanalostomy for juvenile open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:490–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.04.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mearza AA, Aslanides IM. Uses and complications of mitomycin C in ophthalmology. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007;6:27–32. doi:10.1517/14740338.6.1.27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Miserocchi E, Carassa RG, Bettin P, Brancato R. Viscocanalostomy in patients with glaucoma secondary to uveitis: preliminary report. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:566–70. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.10.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Souissi K, El Afrit MA, Trojet S, Kraiem A. Deep sclerectomy for the management of uveitic glaucoma. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2006;29:265–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Di Rocco C, Tamburrini G. Sturge-Weber syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22:909–21. doi:10.1007/s00381-006-0143-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bellows AR, Chylack LT, Epstein DL, Hutchinson BT. Choroidal effusion during glaucoma surgery in patients with prominent episcleral vessels. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:493–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Iwach AG, Hoskins HD, Hetherington J, Shaffer RN. Analysis of surgical and medical management of glaucoma in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:904–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Audren F, Abitbol O, Dureau P, et al. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy for glaucoma associated with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:656–60. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00723.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy for Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2152–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mendrinos E, Mermoud A, Shaarawy T. Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:592–630. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.08.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Mendrinos E, Shaarawy T. Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. In: Stamper R, Grehn F, editors. Glaucoma. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 59–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  74. Sharaawy T, Bhartiya S. Surgical management of glaucoma: evolving paradigms. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59:S123–30. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.73692.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Schwartz KS, Lee RK, Gedde SJ. Glaucoma drainage implants: a critical comparison of types. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:181–9. doi:10.1097/01.icu.0000193080.55240.7e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Ma KT, Yang JY, Kim JH, et al. Surgical results of Ahmed valve implantation with intraoperative bevacizumab injection in patients with neovascular glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:331–6. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820e2fd0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ravinet E, Tritten JJ, Roy S, et al. Descemet membrane detachment after nonpenetrating filtering surgery. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:244–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Karlen ME, Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, et al. Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant: medium term results. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:6–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Roy S, Mermoud A. Complications of deep nonpenetrating sclerectomy. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2006;29:1180–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Kim CY, Hong YJ, Seong GJ, et al. Iris synechia after laser goniopuncture in a patient having deep sclerectomy with a collagen implant. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:900–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Lachkar Y, Neverauskiene J, Jeanteur-Lunel MN, et al. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy: a 6-year retrospective study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004;14:26–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Shaarawy T, Karlen M, Schnyder C, et al. Five-year results of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1770–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Gavrilova B, Roters S, Engels BF, et al. Late hypotony as a complication of viscocanalostomy: a case report. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:263–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Guedes RAP, Guedes VMP. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy in Brazil: a 3-year retrospective study. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2005;28:191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Brubaker RF, Pederson JE. Ciliochoroidal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol. 1983;27:281–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Neudorfer M, Sadetzki S, Anisimova S, Geyer O. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with the use of adjunctive mitomycin C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2004;35:6–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Cheema RA, Choong YF, Algawi KD. Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage following viscocanalostomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2003;34:209–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Tuli SS, WuDunn D, Ciulla TA, Cantor LB. Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after glaucoma filtration procedures. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1808–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kim CY, Seong GJ, Koh HJ, et al. Descemet’s membrane detachment associated with inadvertent viscoelastic injection in viscocanalostomy. Yonsei Med J. 2002;43:279–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Arnavielle S, Lafontaine PO, Bidot S, et al. Corneal endothelial cell changes after trabeculectomy and deep sclerectomy. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:324–8. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180391a04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Egrilmez S, Ates H, Nalcaci S, et al. Surgically induced corneal refractive change following glaucoma surgery: nonpenetrating trabecular surgeries versus trabeculectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1232–9. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.11.055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Milazzo S, Turut P, Malthieu D, Leviel MA. Scleral ectasia as a complication of deep sclerectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:785–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Hyams M, Geyer O. Iris prolapse at the surgical site: a late complication of nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2003;34:132–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Anand N, Arora S, Clowes M. Mitomycin C augmented glaucoma surgery: evolution of filtering bleb avascularity, transconjunctival oozing, and leaks. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:175–80. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.077800.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Tamcelik N, Ozdamar A, Kizilkaya M, et al. Fungal keratitis after nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Cornea. 2002;21:532–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Wallin OJI, Montan PG. Blebitis after deep sclerectomy. Eye (Lond). 2007;21:258–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Shaarawy T, Mermoud A. Deep sclerectomy in one eye vs deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in the contralateral eye of the same patient: long-term follow-up. Eye (Lond). 2005;19:298–302. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Shaarawy T, Nguyen C, Schnyder C, Mermoud A. Five year results of viscocanalostomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:441–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Jonescu-Cuypers C, Jacobi P, Konen W, Krieglstein G. Primary viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in white patients with open-angle glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:254–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Lüke C, Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, et al. A prospective randomized trial of viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma: a 1-year follow-up study. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Gilmour DF, Manners TD, Devonport H, et al. Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy for primary open angle glaucoma: 4-year prospective randomized clinical trial. Eye (Lond). 2009;23:1802–7. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702726.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Dietlein TS, Lüke C, Jacobi PC, et al. Does the dissection depth and thickness of the deep scleral flap affect intraocular pressure after viscocanalostomy? A clinico-pathologic correlation. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2001;218:168–73. doi:10.1055/s-2001-13076.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Dietlein TS, Lüke C, Jacobi PC, et al. Variability of dissection depth in deep sclerectomy: morphological analysis of the deep scleral flap. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:405–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Jehn AB, Bohnke M, Mojon DS. Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant: initial experience. Ophthalmologica. 2002;216:235–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Carassa RG, Bettin P, Fiori M, Brancato R. Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in white adults affected by open-angle glaucoma: a 2-year randomized, controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:882–7. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00081-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Chiselita D. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma surgery. Eye (Lond). 2001;15:197–201. doi:10.1038/eye.2001.60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. El Sayyad F, Helal M, El-Kholify H, et al. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1671–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Mermoud A, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, et al. Comparison of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant and trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:323–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Yalvac IS, Sahin M, Eksioglu U, et al. Primary viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma: three-year prospective randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2050–7. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Eldaly MA, Bunce C, Elsheikha OZ, Wormald R. Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2, CD007059. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007059.pub2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, et al. Deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy with low-dosage mitomycin C: four-year follow-up. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222:81–7. doi:10.1159/000112623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Kobayashi H, Kobayashi K, Okinami S. A comparison of the intraocular pressure-lowering effect and safety of viscocanalostomy and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in bilateral open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:359–66. doi:10.1007/s00417-003-0652-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Russo V, Scott IU, Stella A, et al. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant versus punch trabeculectomy: a prospective clinical trial. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008;18:751–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Shaarawy T, Flammer J, Haefliger IO. Reducing intraocular pressure: is surgery better than drugs? Eye (Lond). 2004;18:1215–24. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Tan JC, Hitchings RA. Non-penetrating glaucoma surgery: the state of play. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:234–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Cameron B, Field M, Ball S, Kearney J. Circumferential viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal with a flexible microcannula during non-penetrating glaucoma surgery. Digital J Ophthalmol. 2006;12(1).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Chiou AG, Mermoud A, Jewelewicz DA. Post-operative inflammation following deep sclerectomy with collagen implant versus standard trabeculectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236:593–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Roy S, Mermoud A. Deep sclerectomy. In: Shaarawy T, Sherwood M, Hitchings R, Crowston J, editors. Glaucoma volume 2: surgical management: expert consult—online and print, 1e. 1 Har/Psc ed. Saunders Ltd; 2009. p. 295–313.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Shaarawy T, Flammer J, Smits G, Mermoud A. Low first postoperative day intraocular pressure as a positive prognostic indicator in deep sclerectomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:658–61.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Compliance with Ethical Requirements

Ziad Khoueir and Tarek Shaarawy declare that they have no conflict of interest.

No human or animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziad Khoueir M.D., M.S.Ed. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

7.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Video 7.1

Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery, Tarek M. Shaarawy, M.D., M.Sc. (MP4 319282 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khoueir, Z., Shaarawy, T.M. (2015). Nonpenetrating Glaucoma Surgery. In: Aref, A., Varma, R. (eds) Advanced Glaucoma Surgery. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18060-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18060-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18059-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18060-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics