Advertisement

Discrete Compound Tests and Dorfman’s Methodology in the Presence of Misclassification

  • Rui SantosEmail author
  • João Paulo Martins
  • Miguel Felgueiras
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 136)

Abstract

Compound tests can be used to save resources for classification or estimation purposes in clinical trials and quality control. Nevertheless, the methodologies that are usually applied are restricted to qualitative group tests. Moreover, when quantitative compound tests are applied the problem is to ascertain whether the amount of some substance of any individual in the group is greater or lower than a prefixed threshold. An overview of the applications of the discrete compound tests highlights the advantages (to save resources) and disadvantages (higher probability of misclassification), and suggests criteria to assess the suitability of applying Dorfman’s methodology.

Keywords

Compound tests Misclassification Simulation Quality measure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the referees for their very useful comments. Research partially sponsored by national funds through the Fundação Nacional para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal — FCT under the projects PEst-OE/MAT/UI0006/2011 and PEst-OE/MAT/UI0006/2014.

References

  1. 1.
    Berger, T., Mandell, J.W., Subrahmanya, P.: Maximally efficient two-stage screening. Biometrics 56, 833–840 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bilder, C.R., Zang, B., Schaarschmidt, F., Tebbs, J.M.: binGroup: a package for group testing. R J. 2, 56–60 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boswell, M.T., Gore, S.D., Lovison, G., Patil, G.P.: Annotated bibliography of composite sampling, part A: 1936–92. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 3, 1–50 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, C., Swallow, W.: Sensitivity analysis of variable-sized group testing and its related continuous models. Biom. J. 37, 173–181 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dorfman, R.: The detection of defective members in large populations. Ann. Math. Stat. 14, 436–440 (1943)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finucan, H.M.: The blood testing problem. Appl. Stat.—J. R. St. C 13, 43–50 (1964)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garner, F.C., Stapanian, M.A., Yfantis, E.A., Williams, L.R.: Probability estimation with sample compositing techniques. J. Off. Stat. 5, 365–374 (1989)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gastwirth, J.L.: The efficiency of pooling in the detection of rare mutations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 1036–1039 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hughes-Oliver, J.M.: Pooling experiments for blood screening and drug discovery. Screening—Methods for Experimentation in Industry, Drug Discovery, and Genetics, pp. 48–68. Springer, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hung, M., Swallow, W.: Robustness of group testing in the estimation of proportions. Biometrics 55, 231–237 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hwang, F.K.: Group testing with a dilution effect. Biometrika 63, 671–673 (1976)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S., Wu, X.: Inspection Errors for Attributes in Quality Control. Chapman and Hall, New York (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, H., Hudgens, M., Dreyfuss, J., Westreich, D., Pilcher, C.: Comparison of group testing algorithms for case identification in the presence of testing errors. Biometrics 63, 1152–1163 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lancaster, V.A., Keller-McNulty, S.: A review of composite sampling methods. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 93, 1216–1230 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Litvak, E., Tu, X.M., Pagano, M.: Screening for the presence of a disease by pooling sera samples. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89, 424–434 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, S.C., Chiang, K.S., Lin, C.H., Chung, W.C., Lin, S.H., Yang, T.C.: Cost analysis in choosing group size when group testing for potato virus Y in the presence of classification errors. Ann. Appl. Biol. 159, 491–502 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Loyer, M.W.: Bad probability, good statistics, and group testing for binomial estimation. Am. Stat. 37, 57–59 (1983)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martins, J.P., Santos, R., Sousa, R.: Testing the maximum by the mean in quantitative group tests. In: Pacheco et al. (eds.), New Advances in Statistical Modeling and Applications, pp. 55–63. Springer, Berlin (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phatarfod, R.M., Sudbury, A.: The use of a square array scheme in blood testing. Stat. Med. 13, 2337–2343 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roederer, M., Koup, R.A.: Optimized determination of T cell epitope responses. J. Immunol. Methods 274, 221–228 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Santos, R., Pestana, D., Martins, J.P.: Extensions of Dorfman’s theory. In: Oliveira, P.E., et al. (eds.) Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Recent Developments in Modeling and Applications in Statistics, pp. 179–189. Springer, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sobel, M., Elashoff, R.: Group testing with a new goal, estimation. Biometrika 62, 181–193 (1975)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sobel, M., Groll, P.A.: Group testing to eliminate efficiently all defectives in a binomial sample. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 38, 1179–1252 (1959)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sterret, A.: On the detection of defective members of large populations. Ann. Math. Stat. 28, 1033–1036 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tu, X.M., Litvak, E., Pagano, M.: Studies of AIDS and HIV surveillance, screening tests: can we get more by doing less? Stat. Med. 13, 1905–1919 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tu, X.M., Litvak, E., Pagano, M.: On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: application to HIV screening. Biometrika 82(2), 287–297 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wein, L.M., Zenios, S.A.: Pooled testing for HIV screening: capturing the dilution effect. Oper. Res. 44, 543–569 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Woodbury, C.P., Fitzloff, J.F., Vincent, S.S.: Sample multiplexing for greater throughput in HPLC and related methods. Anal. Chem. 67, 885–890 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zenios, S., Wein, L.: Pooled testing for HIV prevalence estimation exploiting the dilution effect. Stat. Med. 17, 1447–1467 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rui Santos
    • 1
    Email author
  • João Paulo Martins
    • 1
  • Miguel Felgueiras
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Technology and Management, CEAUL — Center of Statistics and Its ApplicationsPolytechnic Institute of LeiriaLeiriaPortugal
  2. 2.School of Technology and Management, CEAUL — Center of Statistics and Its Applications, CIIC— Computer Science and Communications Research Centre of Polytechnic Institute of LeiriaPolytechnic Institute of LeiriaLeiriaPortugal

Personalised recommendations