Skip to main content

Environmental Protection and Clean Energy Overlaps

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover International Farm Animal, Wildlife and Food Safety Law
  • 1009 Accesses

Abstract

Agricultural plant and animal products often have a complex lifecycle: they are grown, transported, processed, packaged, and—ultimately—consumed, discarded, or recycled. Each of these processes is interrelated. Therefore, efficiency improvements at any stage can support greater sustainability of the entire food chain, with significant environmental, economic, and social welfare repercussions. For instance, better practices at the end of the cycle (like recycling and composting programs for packaging and food scraps) can reduce the amount of food that must be grown at the beginning of the cycle. Lowered demand allows farmers to use less land, water, and chemicals to produce food. In turn, this can:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Indeed, “[t]he carbon footprint of food produced and not eaten is estimated to 3.3 G[iga] tonnes of CO2 equivalent: as such, food wastage ranks as the third top emitter after USA and China.” (This figure is without accounting for GHG emissions from land use change). United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (2013), p. 6. In addition to carbon emissions, landfilled organic waste releases methane, an even more potent greenhouse gas than CO2, as it biodegrades. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2015).

  2. 2.

    Organic waste is a potential input fuel in anaerobic digestion (“waste-to-energy”) biogas plants. See California Energy Commission (2015).

  3. 3.

    See Food and Drink Federation (2014).

  4. 4.

    For example, Kenya’s Agriculture (Farm Forestry) Rules require farmers to establish and maintain farm forestry on at least 10 % of their agricultural lands. See Appendix to Chap. 24.

  5. 5.

    For example, England’s 2003 Organic Farming (England Rural Development Programme) Regulations provide for aid payments to farmers who introduce organic farming methods and comply with certain environmental conditions. See Appendix to Chap. 24.

  6. 6.

    In the United States, for example, the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, Food Additive Regulations govern food packaging component materials. See Appendix.

  7. 7.

    See Sect. 23.7 and Appendix. Australia, South Korea, and a handful of other countries have such “empty space” packaging requirements in place.

  8. 8.

    Roughly a dozen US states have such laws. See infra Sect. 23.3.1.4. Israel also has a national Deposit on Beverage Containers Law, and Germany’s Packaging Waste Ordinance imposes mandatory bottle deposit obligations on retailers. See Appendix.

  9. 9.

    Examples include South Africa’s Plastic Bags Regulation and India’s regional Tamil Nadu Plastic Articles (Prohibition of Sale, Storage, Transport and Use) Act. The Tamil Nadu regulations even forbid restaurant owners from using plastic articles in their establishments. See Appendix.

  10. 10.

    Inorganic food waste, such as plastic or glass packaging, is often regulated separately from other waste streams under recycling laws and programs. See, for example, infra Sect. 23.4.3.

  11. 11.

    See infra Sect. 23.5.2.

  12. 12.

    See infra Sect. 23.4.1.

  13. 13.

    See infra Sect. 23.3.1.4.

  14. 14.

    Wakeland et al. (2012).

  15. 15.

    Wakeland et al. (2012), pp. 201–202.

  16. 16.

    The UK-based Food and Drink Federation (FDF) has “committed to embedding environmental standards into their transport practices … to achieve ‘fewer and friendlier’ food transport miles.” See Food and Drink Federation (2014).

  17. 17.

    See infra Sect. 23.7.

  18. 18.

    United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (2013).

  19. 19.

    World Trade Organization (1995a).

  20. 20.

    World Trade Organization (1995b).

  21. 21.

    World Trade Organization (2015c).

  22. 22.

    World Trade Organization (2015b). At the same time, the agreement protects countries’ right to implement measures that achieve legitimate policy measures (such as protecting human or environmental health).

  23. 23.

    World Trade Organization (2015a).

  24. 24.

    See State of Oregon, Department of Environmental Quality (2005).

  25. 25.

    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1998).

  26. 26.

    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2014).

  27. 27.

    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2014).

  28. 28.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (2015).

  29. 29.

    Buzby and Human (2012), pp. 561–570.

  30. 30.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (2014b).

  31. 31.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (2014a).

  32. 32.

    See infra Sect. 23.3.1.1.

  33. 33.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Program Management, Communications, and Analysis Office (2011).

  34. 34.

    See infra Sect. 23.3.1.4.

  35. 35.

    See infra Sect. 23.3.1.

  36. 36.

    Keller and Heckman LLP (2002).

  37. 37.

    Aggregate transportation accounts for approximately 11 % of total carbon emissions in the US. Wakeland et al. (2012), p. 202.

  38. 38.

    See infra Sect. 23.3.1.4.

  39. 39.

    See infra Sect. 23.3.1.5.

  40. 40.

    United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (2013).

  41. 41.

    42 U.S.C. §§ 6901–6992k. See Cornell University Law School. U.S. code, tit 42, chap 82.

  42. 42.

    Section 6002 requires EPA to develop guidelines for government agencies to use in procuring products containing recycled material. EPA issued such guidelines in 1995 (“Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines”), followed by a guidance document (“Final Guidance on Environmentally Preferable Purchasing for Executive Agencies”) in 1999. Keller and Heckman LLP (2002).

  43. 43.

    42 U.S.C. § 6902. See Cornell University Law School. U.S. code, tit 42, chap 82, subchap 1 § 6902.

  44. 44.

    42 U.S.C. § 6903(27). See Cornell University Law School. U.S. code, tit 42, chap 82, subchap 1 § 6903.

  45. 45.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Program Management, Communications, and Analysis Office (2011).

  46. 46.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (2013a).

  47. 47.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Program Management, Communications, and Analysis Office (2011), p. II-2.

  48. 48.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Program Management, Communications, and Analysis Office (2011), p. II-3.

  49. 49.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Program Management, Communications, and Analysis Office (2011), p. II-3.

  50. 50.

    The guidelines recognize that strategies which divert waste “have positive impacts on both the environment and economy.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Program Management, Communications, and Analysis Office (2011), p. II-3.

  51. 51.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Program Management, Communications, and Analysis Office (2011), p. II-5.

  52. 52.

    42 U.S.C. § 4320 et seq. See Cornell University Law School. U.S. code, tit 42, chap 55.

  53. 53.

    42 U.S.C. § 4332(A). See Cornell University Law School. U.S. code, tit 42, chap 55, subchap 1 § 4332.

  54. 54.

    See Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council, 490 U.S. 332, 336 (1989). Available via Justia (2015).

  55. 55.

    40 C.F.R. § 1508.18. See Cornell University Law School. 40 C.F.R. tit 40, chap V, part 1508, § 1508.18.

  56. 56.

    Keller and Heckman LLP (2002).

  57. 57.

    Keller and Heckman LLP (2002).

  58. 58.

    42 U.S.C. § 1791. See Cornell University Law School. U.S. code, tit 42, chap 13A.

  59. 59.

    42 U.S.C. § 1791(c). See Cornell University Law School. U.S. code, tit 42, chap 13A.

  60. 60.

    42 U.S.C. § 1791(c)(3). See Cornell University Law School. U.S. code, tit 42, chap 13A.

  61. 61.

    Leib (2012) (citing 9 Mass. Gen. Laws, Chap. 94, § 328 (2011)).

  62. 62.

    Leib (2012) (citing Or. Rev. Stat., § 315.156 (2012)).

  63. 63.

    Hendrix (2013).

  64. 64.

    State of Vermont, Waste Management & Prevention Division (2015).

  65. 65.

    State of Vermont, Waste Management & Prevention Division (2015).

  66. 66.

    City of Seattle Public Utilities and Councilmember Bagshaw S (2014).

  67. 67.

    See City of Austin, Resource Recovery. Frequently asked questions.

  68. 68.

    States and territories with bottle bills include California, Connecticut, Guam, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Oregon, and Vermont. Bottlebill.org (2015).

  69. 69.

    Keller and Heckman LLP (2002).

  70. 70.

    SourceSuite (2015).

  71. 71.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.1.

  72. 72.

    Harvard Food Law and Policy Clinic (2013).

  73. 73.

    State of Vermont (2015).

  74. 74.

    Value Chain Management Center (2014).

  75. 75.

    Value Chain Management Center (2010).

  76. 76.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.1.

  77. 77.

    However, the Ontario legislature also made history in 2013 by becoming the first provincial government to pass a bill promising tax credits to farmers who donate surplus food. “The Local Food Act,” an amendment to Bill 36, will give farmers in Ontario a non-refundable 25 % tax credit based on the fair market value of product that they donate to local food banks and community meal programs. Ontario Association of Food Banks (2014).

  78. 78.

    Value Chain Management Center (2010).

  79. 79.

    See Appendix.

  80. 80.

    Recycling Council of Ontario (2010).

  81. 81.

    Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2014).

  82. 82.

    Some provinces are already leading the way. For instance, Nova Scotia has banned organic food waste from its landfills since 1998. See Province of Nova Scotia (2014). Meanwhile, Ontario is stepping up its composting program. See Recycling Council of Ontario (2010).

  83. 83.

    Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2014). See infra Sect. 23.3.2.1.

  84. 84.

    Government of Canada, Minister of Justice (1999).

  85. 85.

    Government of Canada, Minister of Justice (1999), Preamble.

  86. 86.

    Earth911 (2014).

  87. 87.

    Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2012).

  88. 88.

    Congreso General De Los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2003). In 2006, the Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) issued implementing regulations. See Presidente Constitucional de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2006).

  89. 89.

    HIS Environment Intelligence Analysis (2015).

  90. 90.

    Guardian News and Media (2012).

  91. 91.

    Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal (2003).

  92. 92.

    Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal (2004).

  93. 93.

    Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal (2004).

  94. 94.

    Guardian News and Media (2012).

  95. 95.

    Guardian News and Media (2012).

  96. 96.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.3.

  97. 97.

    See infra Sect. 23.3.4.1.

  98. 98.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.1.3.

  99. 99.

    There are, however, some limited city-level initiatives to encourage such practices, such as Curitiba’s Cambio Verde (Green Change) project. This program allows farmers to provide surplus produce to people that bring glass and metal to recycling facilities. See Portal da Prefeitura de Curitiba. Secretario municipal do abastecimiento: programa cambio verde.

  100. 100.

    Pereira (2010). A second edition of the PNRS was issued for 2011–2015. See Câmara dos Deputados (2012).

  101. 101.

    Pereira (2010).

  102. 102.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.2.

  103. 103.

    Beveridge & Diamond PC (2010).

  104. 104.

    US-Brazil Joint Initiative on Urban Sustainability (2012).

  105. 105.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.1.

  106. 106.

    US-Brazil Joint Initiative on Urban Sustainability (2012).

  107. 107.

    US-Brazil Joint Initiative on Urban Sustainability (2012).

  108. 108.

    Pereira (2010), Art. 23.

  109. 109.

    The European Parliament designated 2014 as the “European Year Against Food Waste.” European Parliament (2013).

  110. 110.

    In 2005, the UK government-funded charity Waste & Resources Action Program (WRAP) launched the world’s first major research program on food waste. This led to a groundbreaking report in 2008 quantifying the types and amounts of food and drink waste produced by households in England and Wales. See Waste & Resources Action Program (2008). The report’s “shocking” findings revealed that 6.7 million tonnes of food—equal to roughly 1/3 of all food purchased—are thrown away each year, with a dollar value of over £10 billion. Packaging News (2015).

  111. 111.

    European Union FUSIONS (2015).

  112. 112.

    Levitan (2013). However, rates within individual Member States vary widely. Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, Belgium, Austria, and Germany divert over 97 % of their food waste from landfills (and Copenhagen, Denmark, has banned organic waste from its landfills since 1990). Greece, Bulgaria, Lithuania, and Romania lag behind, with still almost no composting in these countries.

  113. 113.

    Levitan (2013).

  114. 114.

    See infra Sect. 23.4.1.

  115. 115.

    See infra Sect. 23.4.2.

  116. 116.

    See infra Sect. 23.4.3.

  117. 117.

    EUR-Lex (2008).

  118. 118.

    EUR-Lex (2008), Art. 3(1).

  119. 119.

    See Appendix.

  120. 120.

    EUR-Lex (2008), Art. 3(4).

  121. 121.

    See infra Sect. 23.4.3.

  122. 122.

    EUR-Lex (2008), Preamble (6).

  123. 123.

    EUR-Lex (2008), Art. 4(1).

  124. 124.

    EUR-Lex (2008), Art. 4(1).

  125. 125.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.1.1.

  126. 126.

    EUR-Lex (2008), Art. 20(a).

  127. 127.

    EUR-Lex (2008), Art. 23.

  128. 128.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.1.4.

  129. 129.

    See infra Sect. 23.4.3.

  130. 130.

    European Commission, Directorate-General Environment (2009).

  131. 131.

    European Commission, Directorate-General Environment (2011). An additional 2012 guidance document supplements the guidelines. See European Commission, Directorate-General Environment (2012).

  132. 132.

    European Commission, Directorate-General Environment (2012), p. 4.

  133. 133.

    European Commission, Directorate-General Environment (2012), p. 2.

  134. 134.

    European Commission, Directorate-General Environment (2012), pp. 20–23.

  135. 135.

    EUR-Lex (1999).

  136. 136.

    European Environment Agency (2009), p. 7.

  137. 137.

    European Environment Agency (2009), p. 7.

  138. 138.

    EUR-Lex (1999), Art. 1(1).

  139. 139.

    EUR-Lex (1999), Preamble, Part 16.

  140. 140.

    EUR-Lex (1999), Preamble, Parts 16 and 17.

  141. 141.

    EUR-Lex (1999), Art. 5(2)(c).

  142. 142.

    European Environment Agency (2009). The report looks at waste management in five countries and one sub-national region (Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, and the Flemish Region of Belgium). It also includes an econometric analysis of the EU-25 Member States.

  143. 143.

    European Environment Agency (2009), p. 7.

  144. 144.

    European Commission, Directorate-General Environment (2015).

  145. 145.

    EUR-Lex (1994).

  146. 146.

    The directive “aims to harmonize national measures concerning the management of packaging and packaging waste in order, on the one hand, to prevent any impact thereof on the environment of all Member States as well as of third countries or to reduce such impact … and, on the other hand, to ensure the functioning of the internal market and to avoid obstacles to trade and distortion and restriction of competition within the Community.” EUR-Lex (1994), Art. 1(1).

  147. 147.

    See supra Sect. 23.4.1.

  148. 148.

    EUR-Lex (1994), Art. 2(1).

  149. 149.

    EUR-Lex (1994), Art. 15. See also supra Sect. 23.3.2.1.

  150. 150.

    EUR-Lex (1994), Art. 1(2).

  151. 151.

    EUR-Lex (1994), Annex II.

  152. 152.

    EUR-Lex (1994), Annex II(1).

  153. 153.

    EUR-Lex (1994), Annex II(2).

  154. 154.

    EUR-Lex (1994), Annex II(3).

  155. 155.

    Europa (2011).

  156. 156.

    See European Commission, Directorate-General Environment (2013), p. 9.

  157. 157.

    Around 18 % of this recovered waste is composted. Levitan (2013).

  158. 158.

    German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (2015).

  159. 159.

    German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (2015).

  160. 160.

    To compare, the US recycling rate in 2007 was about 33 % (and roughly 43 % for packaging waste). Earth911 (2014).

  161. 161.

    See supra Sect. 23.4.3.

  162. 162.

    See infra Sect. 23.4.4.2.

  163. 163.

    Earth911 (2014).

  164. 164.

    German Federal Government (2000).

  165. 165.

    German Federal Government (2000), Art. 2(2). The act specifically covers “materials that are to be disposed of pursuant to the Animal Carcass Disposal Act (Tierkörperbeseitigungsgesetz) to the Meat Hygiene and Poultry Meat Hygiene Acts (Fleischhygienegesetz; Geflügelfleischhygienegesetz), to the Act on Foodstuffs and Commodities (Lebensmittel- and Bedarfsgegenständegesetz), to the Milk and Margarine Act (Milch- and Margarinegesetz), to the Epizootic Diseases Act (Tierseuchengesetz), to the Plant Protection Act (Pflanzenschutzgesetz) and pursuant to the statutory ordinances issued on the basis of these acts.” German Federal Government (2000), Art. 2(2)(1).

  166. 166.

    German Federal Government (2000), Art. 2(1).

  167. 167.

    German Federal Government (2000), Art. 20(1). See also supra Sect. 23.3.2.1.

  168. 168.

    Earth911 (2014). This figure includes solid, packaging, liquid, gaseous, hazardous, radioactive, and medical wastes.

  169. 169.

    German Federal Government (1998). The ordinance is also called the “German Packaging and Waste Avoidance Law.” The ordinance has been amended at least six times (most recently in 2014) to address such things as refining the definitions of key terms (like “transport packaging”) and specifying the responsibilities of producers and vendors in the e-commerce sector. Interpack Processes and Packaging (2014).

  170. 170.

    See supra Sect. 23.4.3.

  171. 171.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.2.1.

  172. 172.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (2013b). Notably, the ordinance eliminates incineration as a waste disposal option. This encourages more environmentally-friendly disposal options, like composting.

  173. 173.

    See supra Sect. 23.4.4.

  174. 174.

    Neumayer (2000).

  175. 175.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (2013b).

  176. 176.

    See Neumayer (2000).

  177. 177.

    Worldwatch Institute (2013).

  178. 178.

    See infra Sect. 23.5.1.1.

  179. 179.

    Public Radio International (2013).

  180. 180.

    Hirsch and Harmanci (2013).

  181. 181.

    Zhu (2014).

  182. 182.

    United Nations Environment Programme. Circular economy.

  183. 183.

    See infra Sect 23.5.1.2.

  184. 184.

    See infra Sect 23.5.1.3.

  185. 185.

    China Daily USA (2014).

  186. 186.

    China Daily USA (2014).

  187. 187.

    China Daily USA (2014).

  188. 188.

    Japan’s Food Recycling Law is another example. See infra Sect. 23.5.2.1.

  189. 189.

    FDI Invest in China (2008).

  190. 190.

    FDI Invest in China (2008), Art. 1.

  191. 191.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.2.1.

  192. 192.

    FDI Invest in China (2008), Art. 1.

  193. 193.

    Zhu (2014).

  194. 194.

    Zhu (2014).

  195. 195.

    See supra Sect. 23.4.3.

  196. 196.

    Zhu (2014).

  197. 197.

    President of the People’s Republic of China (2002).

  198. 198.

    President of the People’s Republic of China (2002), Art. 1.

  199. 199.

    President of the People’s Republic of China (2002), Art. 28.

  200. 200.

    President of the People’s Republic of China (2002), Art. 23.

  201. 201.

    President of the People’s Republic of China (2002), Art. 23.

  202. 202.

    President of the People’s Republic of China (2002), Art. 23.

  203. 203.

    See supra Sect. 23.5.1.2.

  204. 204.

    See supra Sect. 23.5.1.1.

  205. 205.

    Marra (2013).

  206. 206.

    Global Environment Centre Foundation (2011). The law was revised in 2007.

  207. 207.

    Global Environment Centre Foundation (2011), Art. 2(2).

  208. 208.

    Marra (2013). In these “recycling loop” systems, recycling facilities work symbiotically with industrial and urban areas to improve recycling systems.

  209. 209.

    Marra (2013).

  210. 210.

    Marra (2013).

  211. 211.

    Government of Japan, Ministry of the Environment (1995). The government amended the law in 2000 to increase the scope of covered business entities and the types of materials included in the recycling targets.

  212. 212.

    Government of Japan, Ministry of the Environment (1995).

  213. 213.

    Previously, municipal governments had sole responsibility for handling packaging waste.

  214. 214.

    Government of Japan, Ministry of the Environment (1995).

  215. 215.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.2.1.

  216. 216.

    See supra Sect. 23.5.2.1.

  217. 217.

    See supra Sect. 23.5.1.

  218. 218.

    Kazmin (2014).

  219. 219.

    Kazmin (2014). As a result, one of the Indian government’s current priorities is to modernize the country’s food supply chain by attracting investment in things like cold storage and refrigerated trucks.

  220. 220.

    See infra Sect. 23.5.3.1.

  221. 221.

    Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests (2011). The Plastic Waste (Management and Handling) Rules prohibit the use of recycled or compostable plastic in carry bags used for storing, carrying, dispensing, or packaging food products. In other words, they require all foodstuffs to be packed in virgin plastic.

  222. 222.

    Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests (2000). The rules were put forth by a Committee appointed by the Supreme Court of India, the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), and the Government of India (GoI). The Supreme Court monitors compliance with the MSW rules through the High Courts in each State.

  223. 223.

    Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests (2000), Art. 4(1). See, for example, Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (2004).

  224. 224.

    Hirsch and Harmanci (2013).

  225. 225.

    Nahman and de Lange (2013).

  226. 226.

    Blaine (2013).

  227. 227.

    See supra Sect. 23.5.3.

  228. 228.

    Around 27 % is lost during processing and packaging, 26 % in agricultural production, and 17 % in distribution. Just 4 % of food waste occurs after it has reached consumers. Blaine (2013).

  229. 229.

    See infra Sect. 23.6.1.1.

  230. 230.

    See infra Sect. 23.6.1.1.

  231. 231.

    Republic of South Africa, Department of Environmental Affairs (2013). This program calls for local and national public authorities to work with the private sector to divert biodegradable waste from landfills.

  232. 232.

    Southern African Legal Information Institute (2014). The act was amended in 2014.

  233. 233.

    See supra Sect. 23.4.

  234. 234.

    Southern African Legal Information Institute (2014), Sect. 2(iv).

  235. 235.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.2.1.

  236. 236.

    Republic of South Africa, Department of Environmental Affairs (2011). The NWMS was established under Sect. 6(1) of the NEM:WA.

  237. 237.

    Republic of South Africa, Department of Environmental Affairs (2011).

  238. 238.

    Republic of South Africa, Department of Environmental Affairs (2011).

  239. 239.

    Australian Government, Department of the Environment, Waste, Heritage and the Arts (2010).

  240. 240.

    Australian Government, Department of the Environment (2011).

  241. 241.

    See infra Sect. 23.7.1. In addition to the National Waste Policy, many regional governments have passed waste reduction and/or recycling laws and regulations. For instance, South Australia’s Zero Waste SA Act of 2004 aims to eliminate waste from going to landfills. See Appendix.

  242. 242.

    Australia’s “empty space” regulations for food packaging limit the maximum allowable empty space depending on the category of product. Permissible thresholds range from 25–40 %, with a 25 % limit for cereals and 40 % for more fragile snack foods like chips. Page (2014). Such restrictions are a growing trend worldwide, with similar regulations in place in some US states, Canada, Western and Eastern Europe, South Africa, Australia, Brazil, China, Japan, Taiwan, Tunisia, and South Korea. State of Oregon, Department of Environmental Quality (2005).

  243. 243.

    See Australasian Legal Information Institute (2012). Australia’s Heavy Vehicle National Law (HVNL) and its regulations entered into force in early 2014 in the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, and Victoria (but not yet in the Northern Territory or Western Australia). The HVNL aims to achieve greater efficiencies in the country’s commercial transportation sector, with provisions on vehicle specifications, curfews, load limitations, and speed and travel time restrictions. It is not unique to the food sector; however, its provisions do apply to qualifying food transporters and retailers. Therefore, the law has the potential to improve the energy efficiency of Australia’s food supply chain.

  244. 244.

    Australian Government, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage, and the Arts (2013). The National Waste Policy is agreed to by all Australian environment ministers and endorsed by the Council of Australian Governments.

  245. 245.

    Australian Government, Department of the Environment. About the national waste policy.

  246. 246.

    Australian Government, Department of the Environment. About the national waste policy.

  247. 247.

    Australian Government, Department of the Environment. About the national waste policy.

  248. 248.

    See supra Sect. 23.7.

  249. 249.

    See supra Sect. 23.4.

  250. 250.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.4.

  251. 251.

    See Appendix. Countries and regions embracing the “polluter pays”/EPR approach include the Australian Capital Territory, Canada, the European Union, Israel, Mexico, Russia, and South Africa.

  252. 252.

    See supra Sect. 23.4.4.

  253. 253.

    See Appendix.

  254. 254.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.4.1.

  255. 255.

    See supra Sect. 23.4.2.

  256. 256.

    See supra Sect. 23.5.2.1.

  257. 257.

    See supra Sect. 23.3.1.4.

  258. 258.

    See supra Sect. 23.4.

  259. 259.

    See supra Sect. 23.5.1.

  260. 260.

    See supra Sect. 23.5.2.

  261. 261.

    See supra Sect. 23.7.

  262. 262.

    See Afun (2009).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie Couvillion .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Region

Country/state

Citation

Title

Year passed

Summary or subsections applicable to regulatory issue

Africa

Kenya

Act No. 8 of 1999, as amended by Act No. 6 of 2006, Act No. 17 of 2006, Act No. 5 of 2007, Act No. 6 of 2009

Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act (EMCA) (Cap. 387)

1999

Governs environmental management generally

• Sect. 87 prohibits disposing of any wastes “in a manner that would cause pollution to the environment or ill health to any person.”

• Section 87(4) obligates “every person whose activities generate waste to employ measures essential to minimize wastes through treatment, reclamation and recycling.”

Africa

Kenya

L.N. No. 121 of 2006; printed in Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 69 of 29 Sept 2006, pp. 1-63

Environmental Management and Coordination (Waste Management) Regulations (Cap. 387)

2006

Implement the EMCA; define general rules for waste management and specific rules for certain waste streams (including solid waste, industrial waste, hazardous waste, and pesticides and toxic substances); embrace “cleaner production” principles

Africa

Nigeria

S.I.15 of 1991

National Environmental Protection (Management of Solid and Hazardous Wastes) Regulations

1991

Address the collection, treatment, and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes from industrial and municipal sources; contain highly-detailed provisions for certain waste streams

Part II envisions a multi-pronged approach with information-sharing and monitoring among private operators, industries, and public agencies

Africa

Nigeria

Act No. 25 of 2007

National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (Establishment) Act (NESREA)

2007

Establishes the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency as the major federal body in charge of environmental protection; repeals the now-defunct Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA)

Africa

South Africa

Act No. 73 of 1989, as amended by the National Environmental Laws Amendment Act of 2009

Environment Conservation Act

1989

Governs environmental protection generally; sets out national environmental conservation policy

• Part IV contains provisions on waste management

• Part V covers agriculture and MSW disposal

Africa

South Africa

No. R. 543 of 2002

Plastic Bags Regulations

2002

Prohibit the manufacture, trade and commercial distribution of specified plastic bags

Enacted under section 24 (D) of the Environment Conservation Act

Africa

South Africa

No. R. 625 of 2003

Plastic Carrier Bags and Plastic Flat Bags Regulations

2003

Prohibit the manufacture, trade and commercial distribution of domestically produced and imported plastic carrier bags and plastic flat bags

Enacted under section 24 (D) of the Environment Conservation Act

Africa

South Africa

Act No. 68 of 2008

Consumer Protection Act

2008

Puts packaging disposal and product labelling burdens on industry

• Sect. 22 requires that packaging labels identify the type of packaging and its recyclability.

• Sect. 59 requires suppliers to accept return of goods at no charge to consumer if any national legislation prohibits the disposal or deposit of the goods or their components into a common waste collection system.

Africa

South Africa

Act No. 59 of 2008, as amended by Act No. 26 of 2014

National Environmental Management: Waste Act (NEM: WA)

2008

Governs waste management; sets up waste management hierarchy; embraces “polluter pays”/EPR principle sets goals of:

• 25% diversion of recyclables from landfills by 2016; and

• ultimate phase-out of biodegradable waste from landfills

Primarily implemented by the 2011 National Waste Management Strategy (NWMS).

Americas

Brazil

Lei n. 12.305/10

National Policy of Solid Waste/Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos (PNRS)

2010

Governs solid waste management; focuses on sustainable measures (including packaging requirements); calls for integrated, multi-level management plans

Americas

Brazil (Sergipe)

Lei n. 7.465 de 20 de Julho de 2012; Publicado no Diário Oficial No 26529, do dia 24/07/2012

Law No. 7.645 on the Obligation of Using Biodegradable Packaging/Lei No. 7.645 de Dispõe sobre a utilização obrigatória de embalagens biodegradáveis, e dá providências correlatas

2012

Requires use of biodegradable packaging for materials used for commercial purposes within the State of Sergipe

Americas

Canada

S.C. 1999, c. 33

Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA)

1999

Aims to protect environmental and human health through pollution prevention; embraces “polluter pays”/EPR principle

Part 7 contains general waste management and prevention provisions (although most of the relevant authority is delegated to provincial governments)

Americas

Canada (Manitoba)

C.C.S.M., c. W40

Waste Reduction and Prevention Act

1990

Aims to reduce and prevent waste production and disposal consistent with sustainable development principles

Americas

Canada (Manitoba)

Man. Reg. 195/2008

Packaging and Printed Paper Stewardship Regulation

2008

Requires affected companies to register as product stewards and to remit fees to cover up to 80% of the cost of municipal recycling programmes

Americas

Canada (Ontario)

R.S.O. 1990, c. E.18

Environmental Assessment Act

1990

Regulates environmental assessments

Part II addresses municipal waste disposal

Americas

Canada (Ontario)

R.S.O. 1990, c. E.19

Environmental Protection Act

1990

Aims to protect and conserve the natural environment

• Part V covers waste management

• Part IX covers packaging and container waste

Implemented by Regulation on General Waste Management (R.R.O. 1990; O.Reg. 362)

Americas

Canada (Ontario)

O. Reg 104/94

Regulation on Packaging Audits and Packaging Reduction Work Plans

1994

Requires audits of certain manufacturers and importers to examine impacts of packaging on waste management; requires packaging reduction plans under some circumstances to reduce the amount of waste resulting from packaging

Americas

Canada (Ontario)

O. Reg. 101/94

Regulation on Recycling and Composting of Municipal Waste

1994

Requires certain municipalities to implement “blue box” waste management systems

• Part III addresses municipal waste recycling depots

• Part IV addresses waste recycling sites

Americas

Canada (Ontario)

O. Reg. 102/94

Regulation on Waste Audits and Waste Reduction Work Plans

1994

Requires certain businesses (retailers, schools, hotels, manufacturers, etc.) and construction projects to undergo waste audits, and, under some circumstances, implement plans to reduce, reuse and recycle waste.

Americas

Canada (Ontario)

O. Reg. 103/94

Regulation on Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Source Separation Programs

1994

Requires certain businesses (retailers, schools, hotels, manufacturers, etc.) to implement programs to facilitate source separation of waste for reuse or recycling

Americas

Canada (Ontario)

S.O. 2002, c. 6

Waste Diversion Act

2002

Promotes reducing, reusing and recycling waste; establishes “Waste Diversion Ontario” corporation to develop, implement, and operate waste diversion programmes for designated wastes

Americas

Canada (Ontario)

O. Reg. 273/02

Blue Box Waste Regulation

2002

Designates “blue box” waste as waste consisting of any of the following materials, or any combination of them: 1) glass; 2) metal; 3) paper; 4) plastic; 5) textiles; establishes “Stewardship Ontario” corporation

Americas

Canada (Ontario)

O. Reg. 101/07

Waste Management Projects Regulation

2007

Implements parts of Environmental Assessment Act (Ontario)

Part II concerns landfill siting, waste disposal, and energy/fuel use

Americas

Canada (Prince Edward Island)

R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. E-9

Environmental Protection Act

1988

Aims to manage, protect, and enhance the environment

Sects. 13 to 19 cover waste treatment

Americas

Canada (Prince Edward Island)

P.E.I. Reg. EC691/00

Waste Resource Management Regulations

2000

Carry out Sect. 25 of Environmental Protection Act (Prince Edward Island); contain provisions on waste disposal and waste management, including requirements for composting facilities and recycling plants

Americas

Mexico

DOF 19-06-2007

General Law for the Prevention & Integral Management of Wastes/ Ley General Para la Prevención y Gestión Integral de los Residuos (LGPGIR) (Federal Waste Law)

2003

Governs waste management; provides the country’s legal framework on packaging and recycling activities; embraces “polluter pays”/EPR principle

Implemented by 2006 Regulation for the General Law for the Prevention & Integral Management of Wastes/Reglamento de la Ley General Para la Prevención y Gestión Integral de los Residuos (DOF 30-11-2006)

Americas

Mexico (Federal District)

Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal 22-04-2003

Solid Waste Law of the Federal District/Ley de Residuos Sólidos del Distrito Federal

2003

Regulates solid waste management in Mexico City

Implemented by the Regulation for the Solid Waste Law of the Federal District/Reglamento de la Ley de Residuos Sólidos del Distrito Federal (DOF 07-10-2008)

Americas

Mexico (Federal District)

Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal 10-02-2004

Amendment of the Solid Waste Law of the Federal District/Decreto por el que se Reforman los Artículos Tercero, Cuarto, Séptimo y Octavo Transitorios de la Ley de Residuos Sólidos del Distrito Federal

2004

Requires households to separate organic and inorganic wastes

Amends the Solid Waste Law of the Federal District

Americas

Peru

Law No. 27314

General Law on Solid Waste (The Waste Act)

2000

Establishes rights, duties, powers, and responsibilities of society as a whole to ensure the sanitary and environmentally sound management and handling of solid waste; embraces principles of minimization, environmental risk prevention, and human health and welfare protection; sets norms for recycling operations

Implemented by the Rules of the Waste Act (Supreme Decree N° 057-2004- PCM)

Americas

United States

21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)

1938

Regulates food safety, including approval of food packaging materials

Americas

United States

42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

1969

Requires environmental reviews of major federal actions (including food packaging material approvals)

Americas

United States

42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

1976

Regulates waste management and recycling; provides general mandates, with most authority delegated to state and local governments

Americas

United States

21 C.F.R. § 170 et seq., 42 FR 14483

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (FFDCA), Food Additive Regulations

1977

Regulates food contact substances in packaging

Americas

United States

42 U.S.C. § 1791

Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act

1996

Encourages food donations by shielding donors from liability

Americas

United States (California – City of San Francisco)

Ordinance No. 100-09 (June 9, 2009)

Mandatory Recycling and Composting Ordinance

2009

Sets goal of “virtually zero” landfill waste by 2020 in City of San Francisco

Americas

United States (Vermont)

Act No. 148, 10 V.S.A. § 6602

An act relating to establishing universal recycling of solid waste. (Vermont's Universal Recycling (UR) Law)

2012

Bans landfilling all food scraps by July 1, 2020; bans disposal of recyclable materials (metal, glass, certain plastics, and paper/cardboard) by July 1, 2015.

Asia

China

Order of the President No. 72, adopted in the 28th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the 9th National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China on June 29, 2002

Law of the People's Republic of China on Promotion of Cleaner Production (Cleaner Production Promotion Law)

2002

Aims to:

• promote cleaner production;

• increase the efficiency of the utilization rate of resources;

• reduce and avoid the generation of pollutants;

• protect and improve environments;

• ensure the health of human beings; and

• promote the sustainable development of the economy and society

Requires “cleaner production audits” of certain manufacturers

Asia

China

Announcement No. 63 of 2008

Announcement of Ministry of Environmental Protection promulgating the cleaner production standard for wine industry

2008

Implements the Cleaner Production Promotion Law for the country’s wine producers; provides requirements on:

• production techniques;

• resource and energy use;

• waste recycling; and

• environmental management

Asia

China

Order of the President No. 4, passed in the 4th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 11th National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China on August 29, 2008

Circular Economy Promotion Law of the People’s Republic of China

2008

Aims to promote sustainable development in the nation; introduces policies and instruments for reducing resource consumption and encouraging recycling; embraces a top-down, command-and-control approach

Asia

India

Act No. 29 of 1986

An Act to provide for the protection and improvement of environment and for matters connected therewith (Environment (Protection) Act)

1986

Establishes the powers of the Central Government to protect and improve the environment

Asia

India

S.O. 908(E)

Municipality Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules

2000

Form the backbone of India’s solid waste management policy; charge each municipal authority with developing infrastructure for collecting, storing, segregating, transporting, processing, and disposing of MSW; encourage composting and banning of biodegradable wastes from landfills

Asia

India

S.O. 249(E)

Plastic Waste (Management and Handling) Rules

2011

Prohibit use of recycled or compostable plastic in carry bags used for storing, carrying, dispensing, or packaging food products

Implement Sects. 3, 6, and 25 of the Environment (Protection) Act

Asia

India (Maharashtra)

See Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, Circular No. MPCB/RO(HQ)/B: 1508 of 14/03/2011

Maharashtra Plastic Carry Bags (Manufacture and Use) Rules

2006

Supplement the Central Plastic Waste (Management and Handling) Rules within Maharashtra

Asia

India (Tamil Nadu)

FAOLEX No: LEX-FAOC052632

A Bill to provide for prohibition of sale, storage, transport and use of certain plastic articles for the protection of environment and public health and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto (Tamil Nadu Plastic Articles (Prohibition of Sale, Storage, Transport and Use) Act)

2002

Prohibits the sale, storage, transport and use of certain plastic articles (including carry bags, cups, plates, and tumblers); forbids restaurant owners from using plastic articles in their establishments

Asia

Israel

Law No. 5753-1993

Collection and Disposal of Waste for Recycling Law

1993

Sets out principles and basic legal framework for recycling in Israel; authorizes municipalities to pass bylaws specifying procedures for waste collection, disposal, and recycling

Asia

Israel

Law No. 5759-1999

Deposit on Beverage Containers Law

1999

Requires a fully refundable deposit on most single-serve beverage containers

Implemented by 2001 Regulations

Carried out by ELA Recycling Corporation (a private non-profit organization)

Asia

Israel

Law No. 5771-2011

Regulation of Processing of Packaging Law (Packaging Law)

2011

Regulates both production and processing of packaging material waste; embraces “polluter pays”/EPR principle; aims to:

• minimize packaging volume;

• prevent waste dumping; and

• encourage recycling

Increases local taxes for waste storage in landfills (with revenues to go toward recycling facilities and infrastructure); sets concrete recycling targets, including zero landfilling waste by 2020

Asia

Japan

Act No. 112 of June 16, 1995

Act on the Promotion of Sorted Collection and Recycling of Containers and Packaging (Container and Packaging Recycling Law)

1995

Forms basis for all official recycling efforts in Japan; aims to reduce garbage levels and use recycled containers and packages efficiently

Asia

Japan

Law No. 176 of 2001

Act on Promotion of Recycling of Food Circulation Resources (Food Recycling Law)

2001

Calls for reducing food waste through recycling food resources; requires municipalities to create “recycling loops” for feed and fertilizers

Asia

Russia

Law No. 89-FZ

Federal Law on industrial and consumer waste (Law on Waste)

1998

Russia’s primary federal waste management regulation

A proposed 2014 bill would amend the law to allow for landfill diversion targets and to embrace “polluter pays”/EPR principles

Asia

Russia (Astrakhan)

Regional Law No. 40/2004-OZ

Law on Domestic and Non-domestic Waste

2004

Implements federal Law on Waste

Asia

Russia (Buryatia)

Regional Law No. 1254-IV

Law on Domestic and Non-domestic Waste

2010

Implements federal Law on Waste

Asia

South Korea

As amended by Act No. 13 038, Jan. 1, 2015

Wastes Control Act

1986

Provides basic framework on waste management; requires Minister of Environment to prepare master waste management plan every 10 years

Asia

South Korea

As amended by Act No. 8957, Mar. 21, 2008

Act on Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources

1992

Provides basic framework for waste recycling; requires Minister of Environment to prepare recycling plan every 5 years

Australia/New Zealand

Australia

Law No. 21 of 2012

Heavy Vehicle National Law (HVNL)

2012

Aims to achieve greater efficiencies in the country’s commercial transportation sector, with provisions on vehicle specifications, curfews, load limitations, and speed and travel time restrictions

Australia/New Zealand

Australia (Australian Capital Territory)

Act No. a2001-31

Waste Minimisation Act

2001

Governs waste management at a provincial level; embraces “polluter pays”/EPR principle; work to:

• establish a waste management hierarchy;

• promote environmentally responsible transporting, reprocessing and handling of waste;

• seek integrated waste planning and services

Australia/New Zealand

Australia (New South Wales)

Act No. 58 of 2001

Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Act

2001

Promotes waste avoidance and resource recovery; creates a Waste Fund

Australia/New Zealand

Australia (New South Wales)

LW 17 October 2014 (2014 No. 666)

Protection of the Environment Operations (Waste) Regulation

2014

Provides specifications on waste management, transport, and disposal; enacted under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997

Australia/New Zealand

Australia (Northern Territory)

Act No. 71 of 1998

Waste Management and Pollution Control Act

1998

Aims to reduce waste generation, increase re-use and recycling, and effectively manage waste disposal

Part 6 provides for environmental audits

Implemented by Waste Management and Pollution Control (Administration) Regulations.

Australia/New Zealand

Australia (Queensland)

FAOLEX No: LEX-FAOC107497

Waste Reduction and Recycling Act

2011

Aims at promoting waste avoidance and reduction as well as resource recovery and efficiency actions; establishes shared responsibility between government, business and industry and the community for waste management; creates Waste and Environment Fund; levies taxes at certain waste disposal sites

Implemented by 2011 Waste Reduction and Recycling Regulation

Australia/New Zealand

Australia (South Australia)

Gazette 6.5.2004, p. 1222

An Act to establish a statutory corporation, Zero Waste SA, with the function of reforming waste management in the State; and for other purposes (Zero Waste SA Act)

2004

Establishes a statutory corporation, Zero Waste SA, to reform waste management in the State; aims to eliminate waste generation as well as the landfilling of waste; promotes resource recovery and recycling

Implemented by Zero Waste SA Regulations 2006

Australia/New Zealand

Australia (Tasmania)

Act No. 83 of 1994

Environmental Management and Pollution Control Act (EMPCA)

1994

Governs environment protection and pollution control generally

Relevant implementing regulations include:

• Environmental Management and Pollution Control (Controlled Waste Tracking) Regulations (2010); and

• Environmental Management and Pollution Control (Waste Management) Regulations (2010)

Australia/New Zealand

Australia (Western Australia)

Act No. 36 of 2007

Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Act

2007

Establishes Waste Authority charged with setting out a long term strategy for continuous improvement of waste services, waste avoidance, and resource recovery and for waste reduction, resource recovery, and landfill diversion; calls for yearly business plans, waste plans and of product stewardship plans

Australia/New Zealand

New Zealand

Act No. 89 of 2008

Waste Minimisation Act

2008

Governs waste management; calls for levy on landfill waste and mandatory waste reporting; establishes Waste Advisory Board

• Part 1, Sect. 3 encourages “waste minimisation and a decrease in waste disposal in order to protect the environment from harm and provide environmental, social, economic, and cultural benefits”

• Part II encourages (or sometimes requires) product stewardship schemes (including bottle deposit systems) that hold all parties involved in a product’s lifecycle responsible for managing end-of-life environmental impacts

Europe

European Union

O.J. L. 365, 31.12.1994, pp. 10–23

European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste (Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive)

1994

Aims to protect the environment and maintain robust internal EU trading market; sets recycling targets for packaging waste; mandates environmental “essential requirements” for all packaging; embraces “polluter pays”/EPR principle

Europe

European Union

O.J. L. 182, 16.7.1999, pp. 1–19

Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (Landfill Directive)

1999

Sets short- and long-term landfill diversion targets for Member States, including goals for reducing amount of biodegradable municipal waste going to landfills

Europe

European Union

O.J. L. 338, 13.11.2004, pp. 4–17

Framework Regulation EC 1935/2004 on Food Contact Materials

2004

Sets requirements for food contact materials; requires good manufacturing practices; requires materials to be traceable throughout the production chain

Europe

European Union

O.J. L. 312, 22.11.2008, pp. 3–30

Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste (Waste Framework Directive)

2008

Establishes basic waste management principles for EU Member States; provides general legislative framework for collecting, transporting, recovering, and disposing of waste

• Art. 4 establishes waste management hierarchy

• Art. 22 addresses composting

Europe

European Union

O.J. L. 54, 26.2.2011, pp. 1–254

Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive (Animal By-Products (ABP) Rules)

2011

Regulates materials of animal-origin not consumed by people (including certain by-products of the food production chain, such as fallen stock)

Europe

European Union—Germany

Federal Law Gazette I, p. 2705, as amended by the Act of 3 May 2000 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 632)

An act for Promoting Closed Substance Cycle Waste Management and Ensuring Environmentally Compatible Waste Disposal/Gesetz zur Förderung der Kreislaufwirtschaft und Sicherung der umnweltverträglichen Beseitigung von Abfällen (Closed Substance Cycle and Waste Management Act)

1994

Establishes Germany’s national waste management policy framework; advocates waste avoidance, recovery, and environmentally compatible waste disposal; embraces “polluter pays”/EPR principle

Europe

European Union—Germany

Federal Law Gazette I, p. 2379, as amended by the Fifth Amending Ordinance of 2 April 2008 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 531)

Ordinance on the Avoidance and Recovery of Packaging Waste of 21 August 1998/Verpackungsverordnung—VerpackV (Packaging Waste Ordinance or Packaging and Waste Avoidance Law)

1998

Implements the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive; requires retailers to install recycling bins for primary and secondary packaging; imposes mandatory beverage deposits; prohibits incineration as waste disposal option; embraces “polluter pays”/EPR principle

Europe

European Union—United Kingdom

No. 1941 of 2003

Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations

2003

Implement provisions of the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive regarding “essential requirements” for packaging; embrace “polluter pays”/EPR principle

Europe

European Union—United Kingdom (England and Wales)

No. 1889 of 2012

Waste (England and Wales) (Amendment) Regulations

2012

Implement the EU Waste Framework Directive; require waste collection authorities to collect waste paper, metal, plastic, and glass separately (from both household and commercial/industrial sources) beginning in January 2015

Europe

European Union—United Kingdom (England, Scotland, and Wales)

No. 871 of 2007

Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations (England, Scotland, and Wales)

2007

Implement the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive; address industry’s role in meeting the UK’s recovery and recycling targets; establish a statutory producer responsibility regime by placing legal obligation on businesses that make or use packaging to ensure that a proportion of the packaging is recovered and recycled; embraces “polluter pays” and “collective producer responsibility” principles

Europe

European Union—United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)

No. 198 of 2007

Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations (Northern Ireland)

2007

Implement the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive in Northern Ireland

Europe

European Union—United Kingdom (Scotland)

S.S.I. No. 148 of 2012

Waste (Scotland) Regulations

2012

Implement the EU Waste Framework Directive; provide for the separate collection and treatment of “wet” food waste from other “dry” recyclable waste streams

International

Parties to Protocol

37 I.L.M. 22 (1998)

Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

1997

Sets binding GHG reduction targets, potentially achievable through agriculture and food sector reforms

International

Member States of the World Trade Organization (WTO)

31 U.S.T. 405, 1186 U.N.T.S. 276

Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement)

1995

Aims to facilitate global trading markets; prohibits setting technical regulations, standards, testing, and certification procedure requirements that create unnecessary obstacles to trade

International

Member States of the World Trade Organization (WTO)

1867 U.N.T.S. 483

Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement)

1995

Sets similar constraints as the TBT Agreement on Member States’ food safety, animal, and plant health measures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Couvillion, L. (2017). Environmental Protection and Clean Energy Overlaps. In: Steier, G., Patel, K. (eds) International Farm Animal, Wildlife and Food Safety Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18002-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18002-1_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18001-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18002-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics