Skip to main content

Full Cost Accounting in the Automotive Industry: A Systematic Review and Methodology Proposal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Automotive Technologies 2014

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mobility ((LNMOB))

  • 1433 Accesses

Abstract

To date, it is not known how Full Cost Accounting (FCA) can be applied in the automotive context. Therefore the objective of this paper is to review existing methodological approaches in FCA studies and identify the most appropriate for the automotive sector. This systematic literature review of FCA studies extracted ten different methodological approaches in this field. The Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM) is the most developed FCA methodology applicable to automotive organisations. Its strengths are the ability to provide both physical and monetary metrics for sustainability assessment, its flexibility and the ability to combine multiple sustainability dimensions. The SAM takes the full life cycle approach for the sustainability assessment which allows managers to make the best possible choices at the design stage with knowledge about all possible economic, social and environmental costs of the vehicle throughout its lifetime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baxter T, Bebbington J, Cutteridge D, Harvey G (2003) The sustainability assessment model (SAM): measuring sustainable development performance. Offshore Eur 2:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bebbington J (2007) Accounting for sustainable development performance. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bent D (2006) Towards a monetised triple bottom line for an alcohol producer. Using stakeholder dialogue to negotiate a ‘licence to operate’ by constructing an account of social performance. Sustainability accounting and reporting. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burritt RL, Hahn T, Schaltegger S (2002) Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting—links between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. Aust Account Rev 12:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cavanagh J, Frame BR, Fraser M, Gabe G (2007) Experiences of applying a sustainability assessment model. In: International conference on whole life urban sustainability and its assessment, SUE-MoT conference proceedings, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  6. Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2013) Driving success: a strategy for growth and sustainability in the UK automotive sector. BIS, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. European Environment Agency (2014) Monitoring CO2 emissions from new passenger cars in the EU: summary of data for 2013. EEA, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fiksel JR (2009) Design for environment: a guide to sustainable product development. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray R (1992) Accounting and environmentalism: an exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability. Account Organ Soc 17:399–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Howes R (2002). Environmental cost accounting: an introduction and practical guide. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maclean HL, Lave LB (2003) Life cycle assessment of automobile/fuel options. Environ Sci Technol 37:5445–5452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayyas A, Qattawi A, Omar M, Shan D (2012) Design for sustainability in automotive industry: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:1845–1862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schaltegger S, Burritt RL (2000) Contemporary environmental accounting: issues, concepts and practice. Greenleaf Publishing Limited, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taplin JR, Bent D, Aeron-Thomas D (2006) Developing a sustainability accounting framework to inform strategic business decisions: a case study from the chemicals industry. Bus Strategy Environ 15:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xing Y, Horner RMW, El-Haram MA, Bebbington J (2009) A framework model for assessing sustainability impacts of urban development. Account Forum 33:209–224

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zokaei K, Lovins H, Wood A, Hines P (2013) Creating a lean and green business system: techniques for improving profits and sustainability. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Jasinski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jasinski, D., Meredith, J., Kirwan, K. (2015). Full Cost Accounting in the Automotive Industry: A Systematic Review and Methodology Proposal. In: Denbratt, I., Subic, A., Wellnitz, J. (eds) Sustainable Automotive Technologies 2014. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17999-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17999-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17998-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17999-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics