Skip to main content

Making Informed Healthy Lifestyle Choices: Analysing Aspects of Patient-Centred and Doctor-Centred Healthcare in Self-Help Books on Cardiovascular Diseases

  • Chapter
Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics ((YCLP,volume 3))

Abstract

Using a corpus-based Critical Discourse Analytical approach, this paper examines the relation between doctor-centred and patient-centred elements in self-help books on cardiovascular diseases, represented by a 3.4-million-word corpus of self-help books. The analysis of two structures, viz. acronyms and imperatives realizing the speech act of advice, suggests that contrary to its own claims, self-help health promotion represents a doctor-centred approach rather than focusing on people’s lifeworlds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As acronyms are concerned with lexemes, it could be objected that they are a lexical rather than a grammatical category. The category of acronyms, however, refers to a specific, formally-definable way of creating lexemes rather than with concrete lexemes and this is why I subsume the said category under grammar rather under lexicon.

  2. 2.

    The other topic of corpus pragmatics consistently to be included is what Romero-Trillo (2008: 7) describes as “[c]orpus linguistics and Intercultural Pragmatics from a theoretical and language learning stance.”

  3. 3.

    Informal and widely known acronyms popular in computer-mediated communication such as lol or IMHO do not occur in the corpora.

  4. 4.

    Lower-case abbreviations – for example e.g., i.e., and units of measurement – are not considered acronyms here because they are always used with full stops between letters and are not even theoretically pronounceable.

References

  • Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, A. (1991). Knowledge and control in health promotion. A test case for social policy and social theory. In J. Gabe, M. Calnan, & M. Bury (Eds.), The sociology of the health service (pp. 166–202). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G. (2007). The grammar of words. An introduction to morphology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (2010). The sociology of healthcare (2nd ed.). Harlow/New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt-Mautner, G. (1995). ‘Only Connect.’ Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics. UCREL (University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language) Technical Papers 6: Lancaster University. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2014.

  • Journal of Pragmatics (2004), 36(2) and 36(9) (Special issue: Corpus Linguistics Part III).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jucker, A. H., Schreier, D., & Hundt, M. (2009). Introduction. Corpus linguistics, pragmatics and discourse. In H. Andreas, D. S. Jucker, & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse (pp. 3–9). Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29). Ascona, Switzerland, 14–18 May 2008. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marko, G. (2008). Penetrating language. A critical discourse analysis of pornography. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marko, G. (2009). Eat the right thing. A critical analysis of orthorexic discourses. In E. Lavric & C. Konzett (Eds.), Food and language. Sprache und Essen (pp. 261–274). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marko, G. (2012). My painful self. Health identity construction in discussion forums on headaches and migraines. AAA – Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 37(2), 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mautner, G. (2012). Die kritische Masse. Korpuslinguistik und kritische Diskursanalyse. In E. Felder, M. Müller, & F. Vogel (Eds.), Korpuspragmatik. Thematische Korpora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Analysen (pp. 83–114). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. L., Xu, J., & Kochanek, K. D. (2013). Deaths. Final data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports, 61(4). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_04.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2014.

  • Nettleton, S. (2006). The sociology of health and illness (2nd ed.). Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton, S., & Bunton, R. (1995). Sociological critiques of health promotion. In R. Bunton, S. Nettleton, & R. Burrows (Eds.), The sociology of health promotion: Critical analyses of consumption, lifestyle, and risk (pp. 41–58). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Health at a glance: Europe 2012. No place given: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264183896-en. Accessed 1 Apr 2014.

  • Partington, A., Morley, J., & Haarman, L. (Eds.). (2004). Corpora and discourse. Proceedings of CamConf 2002. Bern, etc.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, I. (2003). Word-formation in english. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayson, P. (2009). Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Computing Department: Lancaster University. [Online] http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix. Accessed 14 Apr 2014.

  • Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 87–121). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Trillo, J. (2008). Introduction. Pragmatics and corpus linguistics – A mutualistic entente. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics and corpus linguistics (pp. 1–10). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Trillo, J. (Ed.). (2013). Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2013. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1994). Grammar, text, and ideology: Computer-assisted methods in the linguistics of representation. Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology. A multidisciplinary approach. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Marko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marko, G. (2015). Making Informed Healthy Lifestyle Choices: Analysing Aspects of Patient-Centred and Doctor-Centred Healthcare in Self-Help Books on Cardiovascular Diseases. In: Romero-Trillo, J. (eds) Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics