Skip to main content

Lived Experience, Science and a Social Imagination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Lived Experience of Climate Change

Abstract

It is important to expand the boundaries imposed by social norms of attention around lived experiences in order to generate a broader and deeper knowledge about pressing social issues, such as climate change, and thereby regain power to set public agendas. For similar reasons it is equally important in academia to establish interdisciplinary endeavours between the scientific (natural and social) disciplines. A combination of the hermeneutic and emancipatory knowledge interests that are elaborated by Jürgen Habermas, and the sociological (which we reframe as ‘social’) imagination of C. Wright Mills are two complementary expressions of this broader and deeper knowledge. In either case, it develops through purposeful transboundary engagement of actors, that is, engagement between diverse lived experiences, between the different social and natural science disciplines, and between lived experiences and the scientific disciplines. Productive transboundary engagement is a challenge, however, requiring mutual trust, shared experience, continual reinforcement, structured discussion with trigger topics and facilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Section 8.2.1 is adapted from a book, ‘Learning for development’, that one of the authors co-wrote with Hazel Johnson (Johnson and Wilson 2009: 20–26).

  2. 2.

    Note our use of the adjective ‘social’. Mills used the term ‘sociological imagination’, because his book is a polemic about social science and social scientists and what they should, and conversely should not, be and practice. He made greatest claim for the social science discipline of sociology. In our book, however, we are not limited to any disciplinary understanding, still less privileging one. The adjective ‘social’ captures perfectly well the kind of imagination of which we espouse.

  3. 3.

    It is somewhat grating to read Mills’ directly here and elsewhere when he refers to ‘men’, ‘he’, etc. to donate people and she/her. We seek your indulgence for a book that was written in the 1950s by a man.

References

  • Abbott, D. (2006). Disrupting the ‘whiteness’ of field work in geography. The Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 27, 326–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, D., & Wilson, G. (2012). The lived experience of climate change: Complementing the natural and social sciences for knowledge, policy and action. International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, 3(4), 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, D., Brown, S., & Wilson, G. (2007). Development as reflective practice. Journal of International Development, 19, 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borda Rodriguez, A. (2008). Knowledge for Development?Reflections from Consultants and Advisors in Bolivia. Ph.D. thesis, The Open University, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32, 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chataway, J. (2005). Introduction: Is it possible to create pro-poor agriculture-related biotechnology? Journal of International Development, 17(5), 597–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipika, S., & Wilson, G. (2006). S. Enabling technological learning among light engineering SMEs in Zimbabwe. Technovation, 26(8), 969–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, A. (2006). Habermas: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010). Agenda for new skills and jobs. http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=958. Accessed 24 February 2015.

  • European Commission. (2011). A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:5db26ecc-ba4e-4de2-ae08-dba649109d18.0002.03/DOC_1&format=PDF. Accessed 24 February 2015.

  • Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, N., & Wield, D. (2002). From followers to leaders: Managing technology and innovation. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Volume 1): reason and the rationalisation of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987a). Knowledge and human interests. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987b). The theory of communicative action (Volume 2). Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewat, C., & Banda, B. (2009). Innovative partnerships for sustainable development in Harare, Zimbabwe. In G. Wilson, P. Furniss & R. Kimbowa (Eds.), Environment, development and sustainability: Perspectives and cases from around the world (Chapter 22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2013). Exploring climate change in science and society: An anthology of Mike Hulme’s writings, interviews and speeches. London: Earthscan/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2003). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Synthersis Report AR5. http://www.ipcc-syr.nl/. Accessed 24 February 2015.

  • Johnson, H., & Wilson, G. (2009). Learning for development. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leemans, R. (2008). Personal experiences with the governance of the policy-relevant IPCC and millennium ecosystem assessments. Global Environmental Change, 18, 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin, A. (2013). Negotiating climate change: Radical democracy and the illusion of consensus. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (2014). Are you an illusion?. Durham: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959/2000). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, G., & Wilson, G. (2005). The antagonistic relevance of development studies. Progress in Development Studies, 5(4), 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S., & Dilling, L. (Eds.). (2007a). Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S., & Dilling, L. (2007a). Toward the social tipping point: Creating a climate for change. In S. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (Chapter 32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, K. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions and everyday life. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Picketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge Massachussetts and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Originally published as: Picketty, T. 20113. Le capital au XXI siècle. Paris: Editions du Seuil).

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, K. (2007). A role for dialogue in communication about climate change. In S. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (Chapter 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shogren, J, & Toman, M. (2000). P. Portney & R. Stavins (Eds.), Climate Change. Public Policies for Environmental Protection (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltaire, F. (1759/2005). Candide, or optimism. With Introduction by M. Wood, (T. Cuffe, Trans.). London and New York: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh, L., Lorenzoni, I., & O’Neill, S. (Eds.). (2011). Engaging the public with climate change: Behaviour change and communication. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G., Furniss, P., & Kimbowa, R. (Eds.). (2009). Environment, development and sustainability: Perspectives and cases from around the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. (2012). The lived experience of climate change: Expanding the knowledge base through collaborative Master’s curriculum in the European Union. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dina Abbott .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abbott, D., Wilson, G. (2015). Lived Experience, Science and a Social Imagination. In: The Lived Experience of Climate Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17945-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17945-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17944-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17945-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics