Abstract
What are organized networks, how do they function and to what extent can they be useful? In order to understand the main benefits of organized networks, it is helpful to become familiar with the underlying theory and how it was developed. In total, eight different theories and concepts are considered. It is argued that organized networks enable professionals to get new ideas, make the world smaller, help to better understand different cultures, and provide access to Buying Centers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Leonhard Euler (1707–1783) was a pioneering Swiss mathematician.
- 2.
Emile Durkheim, Ferdinand Toennies, Georg Simmel and others also contributed to the development.
- 3.
Jacob Moreno (1889–1974) was an Austrian-American psychologist. Alfred Radcliffe-Brown (1881–1955) was a British social anthropologist.
- 4.
Harrison White (1930–) is an American economist and sociologist, now at Columbia University.
- 5.
Some noteworthy authors include Ronald Burt (1949–), Stephen Borgatti (1956–) and Albert-Laszlo Barabasi (1967–).
- 6.
The example and figures are largely based on the book by Barabasi (2002, 15).
- 7.
Adam Smith (1723–1790) was a Scottish philosopher and a pioneer of political economy. Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) was a French historian and political thinker.
- 8.
Quoted from Halbern (2005, 6).
- 9.
This chapter is mainly based on the findings and assumptions of Bourdieu and not Coleman. James Coleman (1926–1995) was an American sociologist. Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002) was a French philosopher.
- 10.
Quoted from Halbern (2005, 7).
- 11.
Robert Putnam (1941–) is an American political scientist at Harvard University.
- 12.
In total, BASF has six “Verbundsysteme” with about 380 production sites.
- 13.
Google Scholars lists more than 24,900 citations (July 2013).
- 14.
Mark Granovetter (1943–) is an American sociologist at Stanford University. Ronald Burt (1949–) is an American sociologist at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
- 15.
According to Granovetter’s first premise, A’s tie to someone outside his group can hardly be strong, but must be weak. Otherwise, it would be unlikely that A is the only one in his social group with this specific tie (Granovetter 1973, 1364). Figures 2.4 and 2.5 are based on a model by Borgatti and Halgin (2011, 4).
- 16.
Stanley Milgram (1933–1984) was an American psychologist. Eric Horvitz (1965–) is an American computer scientist at Microsoft. Jure Leskovec is a data mining specialist at Stanford University.
- 17.
The concept and term of “Six Degrees of Separation” was actually set out by the Hungarian author Frigyes Karinthy. In his short story “Everything is different—Chain-Links”, he bet that it requires no more than five individuals to contact a selected individual using nothing except the network of personal acquaintances (Karinthy 1929, 2; Barabasi 2002, 25ff.).
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
The term is also often used by medical scientists when describing the spread of diseases.
- 21.
Geert Hofstede (1928–) is a Dutch culture scientist.
- 22.
Quoted from Gould and Fernandez (1998, 91).
- 23.
- 24.
Hofstede’s “Cultural Dimensions Theory” is criticized by many scholars for simplifying cultures and their characteristics. In particular, the author of this text opposes Hofstede's approach and method, because it neglects any cultural contacts and all transcultural exchange processes. There is no doubt, however, that the “Cultural Dimensions Theory” is helpful for illustrating differences between cultures, when there is not much space for discussing topics such as cultural identity and affiliation. For this reason alone, Hofstede’s method has been applied here.
- 25.
Indulgence versus Restraint is not yet considered by The Hofstede Center in the comparison of the countries, thus, this book does not deal with it either.
- 26.
- 27.
Power Distance is defined by Hofstede as the extent to which less powerful member of organizations or institutions within a country accept that power is distributed unequally.
- 28.
Individualism addresses the degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members.
- 29.
Long-term Orientation measures the extent to which a society shows a pragmatic future-oriented perspective rather than a conventional historical short-term point of view.
- 30.
For example, Webster did not consider the role of the initiator, although he explains how buying process are started (Webster and Wind 1972, 14, 17).
- 31.
Alexander Graham Bell (1847–1922) was an American engineer who is credited with inventing the telephone.
- 32.
- 33.
Quoted from Choi (1994, 19).
- 34.
The maximum member capacity of online networks is mainly a matter of the expectations of the network.
References
Alexanderson G (2006) Euler and Koenigsberg’s bridges: a historical view. Bull Am Math Soc 43(4):567–573
Barabasi A-L (2002) Linked—the new science of networks. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge
BASF (2014) Verbund. https://www.basf.com/en/company/about-us/strategy-and-organization/verbund.html. Accessed 7 Jan 2015
Borgatti S, Halgin D (2011) On network theory. Organ Sci 1168–1181
Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson J (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press, New York, pp 241–258
Bourdieu P, Wacquant L (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Burt R (1992) Structural holes, the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Burt R (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol 110(2):349–399
Choi JP (1994) Herd behavior, the “Penguin Effect”, and the suppression of informational diffusion: An analysis of informational externalities and Payoff interdependency. Columbia University, New York
Dambeck H (2008) Das Jeder-kennt-jeden-Gesetz. Spiegel online (2 Aug 2008). http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/ueber-6-6-ecken-das-jeder-kennt-jeden-gesetz-a-569705.html. Accessed 6 Jan 2015
de Nooy W (2005) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. University Press, Cambridge
de Tocqueville A (1835, 2012) Democracy in America (trans: Reeve H). University of Adelaide, Paris
Farrell J, Saloner G (1987) Competition, compatibility and standards: the economics of horses, penguins and lemmings. In: Gabel L (ed) Competitive strategies for product standards. McGraw Hill, London
Fernando A (2006) Network effect. Wikimedia commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Network_effect.png. Accessed 7 Feb 2016
Fuhse J (2008) Menschen in Netzwerken. In: Rehberg K-S (ed) Die Natur der Gesellschaft. Campus, Frankfurt, pp 2933–2943
Galambos L (1992) Theodore N. Vail and the role of innovation in the modern bell system. The business history review (Spring 1992). Springer, Berlin, pp 95–126
Gallaugher J (1997–2008) Understanding network effects. John Gallaugher. http://www.gallaugher.com/Network%20Effects%20Chapter.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2015
Giddens A (2009) Sociology. Polity Press, Cambridge
Gould R, Fernandez R (1998) Structure of mediation: a formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociol Methodol 19:89–126
Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380
Granovetter M (2011) The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. In: Granovetter M, Swederg R (eds) The sociology of economic life. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 46–61
Halbern D (2005) Social capital. Polity Press, Cambridge
Hanifan LJ (1920) The community center. Silver, Burdett and Company, Boston
Harvard University (2013) Bowling alone. http://bowlingalone.com/?page_id=13. Accessed 26 July 2013
Homburg C, Kuester S, Krohmer H (2013) Marketing management, a contemporary perspective, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Education, Berkshire
Karinthy F (1929) Everything is different—chain-links. Google docs. https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdjjr-courses.wdfiles.com%2Flocal–files%2Fsoc180%3Akarinthy-chain-links%2FKarinthy-Chain-Links_1929.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2015
Kleinfeld J (2001) Could it be a big world after all? The six degrees of separation myth. Psychology today (April 12, 2001)
Kotler P, Bliemel F (2006) Marketing-management, analyse, Planung und Verwirklichung, 10th edn. Pearson Education Deutschland, Munich
Kotler P, Pfoertsch W (2006) B2B brand management. Springer, Heidelberg
Marsden P (1982) Brokerage behavior in restricted exchange networks. In: Marsden P, Lin N (eds) Social structure and network analysis. Sage Publications, London, pp 201–218
Microsoft Research (2006) Six degrees of separation. Microsoft research (July 2006). http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/horvitz/degrees_of_separation.htm. Accessed 6 Jan 2015
Milgram S (1967) The small world problem. Psychol Today 2(1):60–67
Parjanen S, Hyypiae M, Oikarinen T (2011) Brokerage function in network level innovation processes. In: Organization learning, knowledge and capabilities conference. University of Warwick, Hull, pp 1–17
Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2005) Two-sided network effects: a theory of information product design. Manage Sci 51:1494–1504
Rohlfs J (1974) A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell J Econ Manage Sci 5:16–37
Scott J (2004) Social network analysis. Sage Publications, London
Shapiro C, Varian H (1999) Information rules—a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School, Cambridge
Sheridan P, Muhamad R, Watts D (2003) An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science (301):827–829
Sundararajan A (2003–2006) Network effects. http://oz.stern.nyu.edu/io/network.html. Accessed 6 Jan 2015
The Hofstede Center (2012) The Hofstede center. http://www.geert-hofstede.com/. Accessed 6 Jan 2015
Travers J, Milgram S (1969) An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry 32(4):425–443
Walter D (2010) Six degrees of separation. Wikimedia commons. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Six_degrees_of_separation.svg. Accessed 7 Feb 2015
Wassermann S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Webster F, Wind Y (1972) A general model for understanding organizational buying behavior. J Market 12–19
White H (1992) Identity and control. Princeton University Press, Princeton
White H (2001) Markets from networks, socioeconomic models of production. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Häntzschel, A. (2015). Benefits of Organized Networks. In: German-Sino Business Networks. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17858-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17858-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17857-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17858-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)