Skip to main content

Issues in Trade Liberalisation in Southern and Eastern Mediterranean Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Agricultural Development

Abstract

Member Partner Countries plus Turkey (MPCs) face numerous challenges to agricultural policy and competitiveness. The current policy strategy has not generated desperately needed economic development in rural areas and growth in value-added agriculture is low compared to other developing regions, all of which indicate a need for new approaches that go beyond conventional industry analysis. Using principles from the supply chain management literature and drawing heavily from current value chain thinking, this chapter applies a Global Value Chain Analysis (GVCA) to the fresh orange export sector in MPCs. Consumer data was collected in four European countries through quantitative surveys and Tesco loyalty card data and field interviews were conducted with value chain stakeholders in MPCs. A set of policy recommendations are presented. It is hoped the findings catalyse a discussion on the use of value chain thinking in agricultural policy formation for the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the following section, an assessment of the value of the preferences given under this review is presented.

  2. 2.

    Some of them have been supported by the EU research programmes, such as SustainMED (or the previous project EUMED-AGPOL) or are linked to international organisations (e.g. IFPRI, IEMED, CSER/CEPS, CEPR, CIHEAM, IMF, etc.).

  3. 3.

    See Garcia Alvarez-Coque (2002), Kuiper (2004), De Wulf, and Maliszewska (2009), Rastoin (2009), Emlinger (2010) and Abis (2011).

  4. 4.

    See the Ph.D. dissertation of Hassan Oaubouch for further details on methods and findings. The methodology is explained in Garcia Alvarez-Coque et al. (2009, 2010).

  5. 5.

    See McCalla and Josling (1985, pp. 36–41) to review the methodology of the trade elasticities calculation.

  6. 6.

    The monthly detailed results are available upon the authors’ request, and more details are also available in Ouabouch (2013).

  7. 7.

    We keep the “usual” criteria for identifying peaks: the literature identifies as tariff peaks those above 0.2 (mentioned in ICTSD 2009). Among these peaks, the modalities document circulated in the WTO current negotiations, suggests that the highest tariff reductions shall be done in those where the final bound tariff or ad valorem equivalent is greater than 75 % (World Trade Organization 2008). Following this, we will identify as “high AVE peaks” those AVE values greater than 0.75.

  8. 8.

    These country results are omitted for space reasons, but are available upon the authors’ request. More details can be found in Tudela et al. (2013).

  9. 9.

    All the details of the analysis can be found in Taghouti and Garcia Alvarez-Coque (2013).

  10. 10.

    As in the previous case, more details can be found in the SustainMED report “Agricultural trade liberalization in the Mediterranean region” SustainMED, Deliverable D10. Available at http://sustainmed.iamm.fr/index.php/publications/project-reports.

References

  • Abis, S. (2012). Wheat in the Mediterranean Region: Societies, Trade and Strategies, Mediterranean. European Institute of the Mediterranean. IEMED, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrosynergie (2008). Evaluation of the system of entry prices and export refunds in the fruit and vegetables sector. Framework contract no 30-CE-0035027/00-37. Evaluations. Fruit and vegetables.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylis, K., Nogueira, L., & Pace, K. (2010). Food import refusals: Evidence from the European Union. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93, 566–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger, P., Kavallari, A., Rau, M.L. & Rutten, M. (2013). Trade openness and investment in North Africa. A CGE application to deep and comprehensive free trade areas (DCFTAs) between the EU and respectively Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia. Paper prepared for the 2013 International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium Symposium. productivity and its impacts on global trade 2–4 June 2013 Seville, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britz, W., Junker, F. & Weissleder, L. (2006). Quantitative assessment of EU-Mediterranean trade liberalization using the CAPRI modelling system. EU-MED AGPOL Deliverable D24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunte, F. (2005). Liberalising EU imports for fruits and vegetables. Paper prepared for presentation at the XIth Congress of the EAAE (European Association of Agricultural Economists), The Future of Rural Europe in the Global Agri-Food System, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemnitz, C., Grethe, H. & Kleinwechter, U. (2007). Quality Standards for Food Products—A Particular Burden for Small Producers in Developing Countries? Contributed paper at the EAAE Seminar “Pro-poor Development in Low Income Countries: Food, Agriculture, Trade, and Environment”, 25–27 October 2007, Montpellier, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioffi, A. & dell’Aquila, C. (2004). The effects of trade policies for fresh fruit and vegetables of the European Union. Food Policy, 29, 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compes, R., Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J. M., & Garcia Azcarate, T. (2013). The EU’s relations with morocco and turkey in the field of agriculture: An example for the EU and its neighbours. Jacques Delors Institute: Notre Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wulf, L. & Maliszewska, M (Eds.) (2009). Economic Integration in the Euro-Mediterranean Region. Final report, elaborated by the Centre for Social and Economic Research and Centre for European Policy Studies for the European Commission: DG Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlinger, C. (2010). Accords euro-méditerranéens et libéralisation des échanges agricoles: quel accès au marché européen pour les fruits et légumes des pays méditerranéens? Les Notes d’analyse du CIHEAM, N° 55—Janvier 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J. M. (2002). Agricultural trade and the Barcelona process. Is full liberalisation possible? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29, 399–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J. M. (2012.). Agriculture in North Africa: A chance for development. Policy Brief the German Marshall Fund of the United States, Prepared in Partnership with Paralleli Euromediterranean Institute (Turin) October 2012, http://www.gmfus.org

  • Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J. M., Martinez-Gomez, V., & Villanueva, M. (2009). A trade model to evaluate the impact of trade liberalization on EU tomato imports. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(2), 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J. M., Martinez-Gomez, V., & Villanueva, M. (2010). Seasonal protection of F&V imports in the EU: Impacts of the entry price system. Agricultural Economics, 41, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J.M.; Jordan, J.M.; Martinez-Gomez, V. (2012). Globalisation of agricultural trade—what will be the place of Mediterranean products? In Mediterra 2012, The Mediterranean diet for regional development (Chap. 17, pp. 345–367) Paris: CIHEAM

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, L., & Grethe, H. (2009). The EU entry price system for fresh fruits and vegetables—Paper tiger or powerful market barrier? Food Policy, 34, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Mellado, A., Hélaine, S., Rau, M. L., & Tothova, M. (2010). Non-Tariff measures affecting agro-food trade between the EU and Africa. Summary of a Workshop, JRC Technical Notes: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC European Commission, Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grazia, C. Hammoudi, A. & Malorgio, G. (2009). Regolamentaziones Della qualità sanitaria degli alimenti e acesso dei Paesi Della riva Sud del Mediterraneo ai Mercali europei: un’analisi empirica, Comunicazione XLVI Convegno di Studi, SIDEA, Piacenza settembre 16–19 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grethe, H. (2005). The future of agriculture trade preferences granted by the eu to developing countries. Contributed paper to the IATRC Summer Symposium “Pressures for Agricultural Policy Reform: WTO Panels and the Doha Round of Negotiations”

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, B. & Nicita, A. (2008). Trade policy, trade costs, and developing country trade. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 4797, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICTSD. (2009). Capping Unusually High Tariffs: The WTO Doha Round and Tariff Peaks. Number 9, November 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouanjean, M-A., Maur, J-C. & Shepherd, B. (2012). Reputation matters: Spillover Effects in the Enforcement of US SPS Measures. In Non-tariff measures-a fresh look at trade policy’s new frontier. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. NW, Washington: USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavallari, A. (2009). Agricultural trade policy reforms and trade liberalisation in the Mediterranean Basin. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee, H, Nicita, A. & Olarreaga, M. (2009). Estimating trade restrictiveness indices. Economic Journal, 119, 172–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, M. (2004). Fifty ways to leave your protection. comparing applied models of the Euro-Mediterranean association agreements. ENARPRI Working Paper Nº. 6/April 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P., Croser, J. & Anderson, K. (2009). Global distortions to agricultural markets: New indicators of trade and welfare impacts, 1955 to 2007. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4865, March 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manole, V. & Spatareanu, M. (January 2010). Trade openness and income—A re-examination. Economics Letters, 106(1), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A. (2013). A triumph for the Irish Presidency—A damp squib for CAP reform, at http://capreform.eu/a-triumph-for-the-irish-presidency-a-damp-squib-for-cap-reform/

  • McCalla, A. F., & Josling, T. E. (1985). Agricultural policies and world markets. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalopoulos, C. (1999). The developing countries in the WTO. World Development, 27, 117–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouabouch, H. (2013). El sector agroalimentario marroquí y la liberalización del comercio. PhD Thesis dissertation, unpublished. Universitat Politècnica de València.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, Q., Droqué, S. & Anania, G. (2010). Calibrating mathematical programming spatial models. AgFoodTrade Working Paper 2009–10 (revised March 2010) http://www.ecostat.unical.it/Anania/varie%20main/Paris-Drogu%C3%A9-Anania,%20Calibrating%20Spatial%20Trade%20Models,%20WP%20March%202010%20_revised_pdf

  • Rastoin, J.-L. (2009 B). Agriculture méditerranéenne : les trois défis de la mondialisation, Options Méditerranéennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, J., Bardaji, I., Garrido, A. and Iglesias, E. (2012). Reforma de la PAC de 2003. Evaluación del impacto de la reforma sobre la superficie, los rendimientos de secano y la diversidad de cultivos en España. Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales 12(2), 103–105. doi: 10.7201/earn.2012.02.05.

  • Santeramo, F. & Cioffi. (2012). The entry price threshold in EU agriculture: Deterrent or barrier? Journal of Policy Modeling 34, 691–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taghouti, I. & Garcia Alvarez-Coque, J. M. (2013). Agro-food trade and reputation: An investigation of non-tariff measures applied by the European Union on developing countries’ exports. Contributed paper to the AEEA “IX Congreso de Economía Agraria. La innovación rural y alimentaria frente a la crisis”, Castelldefells, Barcelona, September 3–5 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudela, L., Martinez-Gomez, V. & Garcia Alvarez-Coque, J. M. (2013). NTMs and AVE peaks in agrifood trade in MENA countries. Contributed paper to the AEEA “IX Congreso de Economía Agraria. La innovación rural y alimentaria frente a la crisis”, Castelldefells, Barcelona, September 3–5 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2008). Revised draft modalities for agriculture, Committee on Agriculture Special Session. TN/AG/W/4/Rev.1, Geneva. February 8 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Prof. Garcia-Alvarez-Coque and Ms. Tudela are grateful to the SustainMED project “Sustainable agri-food systems and rural development in the Mediterranean Partner Countries” (SustainMED, FP7 European Commission). Victor Martinez-Gomez is grateful for the support received from the Universitat Politècnica de València, (PAID-06-12).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José María García Álvarez-Coque .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tudela-Marco, L., Álvarez-Coque, J.M.G., Martínez-Gómez, V. (2015). Issues in Trade Liberalisation in Southern and Eastern Mediterranean Countries. In: Petit, M., Montaigne, E., El Hadad-Gauthier, F., García Álvarez-Coque, J., Mattas, K., Mili, S. (eds) Sustainable Agricultural Development. Cooperative Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17813-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics