Abstract
In this chapter, the question of whether assessment is best seen as ‘art’ or ‘science’ is explored in connection with the overarching question of the role that research can or ought to play in clinical practice and what the integration of research evidence into practice actually involves. Exploring the strengths and limitations of each position (‘art’ and ‘science’), the chapter discusses the use of tacit knowledge and reflective practice in the more ‘bottom-up’ intuitive approach, as well as the use of structured and actuarial approaches in the more ‘top-down’ analytic approach. It then outlines the basis for a ‘knowledge-based’ approach to assessment and diagnosis in which evidence is synthesized from multiple sources, and practice-based research is utilized to challenge the limitations of more traditional approaches. It concludes by making the case for critical pluralism, a pragmatic approach to assessment that allows practitioners to assess the relevance and utility of particular forms of knowledge for particular clients and to reconcile some of the tensions between competing, and often polarized, approaches to diagnosis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
Brendel, D. H. (2006). Healing psychiatry: bridging the science/humanism divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Castel, R. (1991) From dangerousness to risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds.), The foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Collins, H. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Cooper, D. G. (1967). Psychiatry and anti-psychiatry. London: Tavistock.
Corby, B. (2006). Applying research in social work practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Corby, B. (2006b). Child abuse: Towards a knowledge base. Maidenhead: Berkshire.
Cree, V. (2002). The changing nature of social work. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
D’Cruz, H., & Jones, M. (2004). Social work research: Ethical and political contexts. London: Sage.
de Zulueta, F. (1993). From pain to violence: the traumatic roots of destructiveness, London: Whurr.
Dingwall, R., Eekalaar, J., & Murray, T. (1983). The protection of children: state, intervention and family life. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dodd, S.-J., & Epstein, I. (2012). Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant students. Abingdon: Routledge.
Evans, T., & Hardy, M. (2010) Evidence and knowledge for practice. Cambridge: Polity.
Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy for corrections. Criminology, 30(4), 449–75.
Fitzgibbon, W. (2011). Probation and social work on trial: Violent offenders and child abusers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fitzgibbon, W. (2011b). Probation and social work on trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (1961) Madness and civilisation: A history of insanity in the age of reason. London: Allen Unwin.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gilgun, J. (1994). Hand into glove. The grounded theory approach and social work practice research. In E. Sherman & W. J. Reid (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 115–125). New York: Columbia University Press.
Glasby, J. (2011). From evidence based to knowledge based policy and practice. In Glasby, J. (Ed.), Evidence, policy and practice: critical perspectives in health and social care. Bristol: Policy Press.
Glasby, J. & Beresford, P. (2006) Commentary and issues: Who knows best? Evidence-based practice and the service user contribution. Critical Social Policy, 26, 268–284.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday.
Gray, M., & Webb, S. (2008). Social work as art revisited. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 182–193.
Hammersley, M. (2013). The myth of research based policy and practice. London: Sage.
Holland, S. (2011). Child and family assessment in social work practice (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Hudson, C. G. (2009). Decision making in evidence based practice: Science and art, Smith College Studies in Social Work, 79, 155–174.
Humphries, B. (2008). Social work research and social justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kazi, M. (2003). Realist evaluation in practice. London: Sage.
Kemshall, H. (1998). Defensible decisions for risk: Or ‘it’s the doers wot get the blame. Probation Journal, 45(6), 67–72.
Kirk, S. A., & Reid, W. J. (2002). Science and social work: A critical appraisal. New York: Columbia University Press.
Laing, R. D. (1960). The divided self. London: Tavistock.
Laing, R. D., & Esterton, A. (1970). Sanity, madness and the family. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langan, J., & Lindow, V. (2004). Living with risk. Mental health service user involvement in risk assessment and management. Bristol: Policy Press/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Martinez-Brawley, E. E., & Zorita, P. M. B. (1998) At the edge of the frame: Beyond science and art in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 28(2), 197–212.
McLaughlin, H. (2010). Keeping service user involvement in research honest. British Journal of Social Work, 40(5), 1591–1608.
Miller, P. (1986). Critiques of psychiatry and critical sociologies of madness. In P. Miller & N. Rose (Eds.), The power of psychiatry. Cambridge: Polity.
Munro, E. (2003). Formal risk assessment instruments or intuitive knowledge? Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
Munro, E. (2005). Improving practice: Child protection as a systems problem. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(4), 375–391.
Munro, E. (2008). Effective child protection (2nd ed.). CA, Sage: Los Angeles.
Munro, E. (2010). Learning to reduce risk in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, (4), 1135–1151.
Munro, E. (2011) The munro review of child protection: Final report. A child-centred system. London: Department for Education.
Newman, T., Moseley, A., Tierney, S., & Ellis, A. (2005). Evidence-based social work: A guide for the perplexed. Lyme Regis: Russell House).
Parker, J., & Bradley, G. (2004). Social work practice: Assessment, planning, intervention and review. Exeter: Learning Matters.
Parton, N. (2008). Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’. British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 253–269.
Pawson, R., Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Long, A., & Barnes, C. (2003). Types and quality of knowledge in social care. Knowledge review 3. London/Bristol: Social Care Institute for Excellence/Policy Press.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
Peay, J. (2003). Decisions and dilemmas: Working with mental health law. Oxford: Hart.
Pithouse, A., Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Wastell, D., & White, S. (2012). Trust, risk and the (Mis)management of contingency and discretion through new information technologies in children’s services. Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 158–178.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2004). Practice and the human sciences: The case for a judgment-based practice of care. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Richmond, M. E. (1917). Social diagnosis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Rose, N. (1996). Psychiatry as a political science: Advanced liberalism and the administration of risk. History of the Human Sciences, 2, 1–23.
Rose, N. (2005). In search of certainty: Risk management in a biological age. Journal of Public Health, 4(3), 14–22.
Ryan, T. (2000). Exploring the risk management strategies of mental health service users. Health, Risk and Society, 2(3), 267–282.
Scheff, T. J. (1966). Being mentally ill. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Scull, A. (1986). Mental patients and the community: A critical note. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 9, 383–392.
Shaw, I. (1999). Qualitative evaluation. London: Sage.
Shaw, I. (2008). Ways of knowing. In M. Gray & S. A. Webb (Eds.), Social work theories and methods, London: Sage.
Shaw, I. (2011). Evaluating in practice (2nd ed.). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Shaw, I., & Norton, M. (2008). Kinds and quality of social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 38(5), 953–970.
Sheldon, B. (2001). The validity of evidence-based practice in social work: A reply to Stephen Webb. British Journal of Social Work, 31(5), 801–809.
Sheldon, B., & Macdonald, G. (2008). A textbook of social work. London: Routledge.
Sheppard, M. (2006). Social work and social exclusion. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Sheppard, M. (2007). Assessment: From reflexivity to process knowledge. In Lishman, J. (Ed.), Handbook for practice learning in social work and social care (2nd ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Soydan, H. (1999). The history of ideas in social work. Birmingham: Venture Press.
Stanley, N., & Manthorpe, J. (2001). Reading mental health inquiries: Messages for Social Work. Journal of Social Work, 1(1), 77–99.
Szasz, T. S. (1961). The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Deel.
Tantam, D. (1991). The anti-psychiatry movement. In G. E. Berrios & H. Freeman (Eds.), One hundred and fifty years of British psychiatry 1841–1991. London: Gaskell.
Taylor, C., & White, S. (2000). Practicing reflexivity in health and welfare: making knowledge. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wilson, K., Ruch, G., Lymbery, M., & Cooper, A. (2008). Social work: An introduction to contemporary practice. Harlow: Pearson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hardy, M. (2015). Integrating Practice and Research on Mental Disorder. In: Probst, B. (eds) Critical Thinking in Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis. Essential Clinical Social Work Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17774-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17774-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17773-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17774-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)