Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Essential Clinical Social Work Series ((ECSWS))

Abstract

A conceptual introduction sets forth the book’s aim: to guide clinical social work students (and practicing clinicians) to explore assessment from a range of theoretical frameworks, each with its own emphasis, limitations, and form of evidence, and to think critically about what each perspective has to offer, takes for granted, omits, and counts as knowledge. It begins by exploring the meaning of the key terms “critical thinking,” “diagnosis,” and “assessment” and draws on both theory and research to trace how these concepts have been addressed in social work education and practice. Following an overview of the book’s structure and content, including introduction to the case of Ray (a case that will be used throughout the chapters and analyzed from each clinical perspective), the introduction concludes with specific suggestions for educators about ways to use the book to develop complex, reflexive, and critical thinking in their students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Epple, D. M. (2007). Inter and intra professional social work differences: Social Work’s challenge. Clinical Social Work Journal, 35, 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill, E. (2005). Critical thinking, evidence-based practice, and mental health. In S. A. Kirk (Ed.), Mental disorders in the social environment: Critical perspectives (pp. 247–269). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi, N. (2005). Barrier or bridge? The language of diagnosis in clinical social work. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 75(1), 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, S. A., Siporin, M. & Kutchins, H. (1989). The prognosis for social work diagnosis. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work. 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, S. A. (2005). Critical perspectives. In S. A. Kirk (Ed.), Mental disorders in the social environment: Critical perspectives (pp. 1–22). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutchins, H. & Kirk, S.A. (1995). Should DSM be the basis for teaching social work practice in mental health? No! Journal of Social Work Education, 31(2), 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacasse, J. R. & Gomory, T. (2003). Is graduate social work education promoting a critical approach to mental health practice? Journal of Social Work Education, 39(3), 383–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattaini, M. A. (2005). Mapping practice: Assessment, context, and social justice. In S. A. Kirk (Ed.), Mental disorders in the social environment: Critical perspectives (pp. 62–82). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuaide, S. (1999). A social worker’s use of the diagnostic and statistical manual. Families in Society, 80(4), 410–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, E. J. & Streiner, D. L. (2004). The evidence for and against evidence-based practice. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4(2). 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, B. S., Clemmons, V. & Dannenfelser, P. L. (2007). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders in graduate social work education: Then and now. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(2), 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, B. (2012). Diagnosing, diagnoses, and the DSM in clinical social work. Families in Society, 93(4), 255–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, B. (2013) Walking the tightrope: Clinical social workers’ use of diagnostic and environmental perspectives. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41(2), 184–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffoul, P. R. & Holmes, K. A. (1986). DSM-III content in social work curricula: Results of a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 22(1): 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reamer, F. G. (2005). Social work, mental health, and mental disorders. In S. A. Kirk (Ed.), Mental disorders in the social environment: The ethical dimensions (pp. 411–429). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B. A. (2004). What is evidence-based practice? Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, (2). 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. J. (2002). Diagnosis in social work: New imperatives. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. B. W. & Spitzer, R. L. (1995). Should DSM be the basis for teaching social work practice in mental health? Yes! Journal of Social Work Education, 31(2), 148–153.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Probst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Probst, B. (2015). Why This Book Is Needed. In: Probst, B. (eds) Critical Thinking in Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis. Essential Clinical Social Work Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17774-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics