Abstract
In the United States, stroke is the fourth leading cause of death and a major reason for disability. Those who survive the initial event are at a high risk of recurrence. Recurrent ischemic events account for up to a quarter of annual strokes. Hence, selecting the appropriate antithrombotic to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke is of utmost importance. Appropriate and judicious use of medications for secondary prevention of stroke or TIA can lead to considerable reduction of healthcare costs and decrease the burden of stroke in general. In patients without atrial fibrillation, secondary prevention with antiplatelet drugs has been proven effective along with other risk factor modifiers to reduce recurrence. Currently, antiplatelet agents (e.g., Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Aspirin plus Dipyridamole) are being used for the secondary prevention of stroke.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2011;42(1):227–76.
Katz BS, Flemming KD. Antithrombotic selection and risk factor management in ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(1):E10.
Hankey GJ, Warlow CP. Treatment and secondary prevention of stroke: evidence, costs, and effects on individuals and populations. Lancet. 1999;354(9188):1457–63.
Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2014;45:2160–236.
Johnson ES, Lanes SF, Wentworth CE, Satterfield MH, Abebe BL, Dicker LW. A metaregression analysis of the dose–response effect of aspirin on stroke. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1248–53.
Patrono C, García Rodríguez LA, Landolfi R, Baigent C. Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(22):2373–83.
Antithrombotics trialists' collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324(7329):71–86.
The Dutch TIA trial study group. A comparison of two doses of Aspirin (30 mg vs 283 mg a day) in patients after a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1261–6.
Farrell B, Godwin J, Richards S, Warlow C. The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54(12):1044–54.
Serebruany VL, Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, et al. Analysis of risk of bleeding complications after different doses of aspirin in 192,036 patients enrolled in 31 randomized controlled trials. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(10):1218–22.
International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19,435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997;349:1569–81.
CAST (Chinese Acute Stroke Trial) collaborative group. CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997;349:1641–9.
Sandercock PAG, Counsell C, Gubitz GJ, Tseng MC. Antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2008;3.
Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(3):870–947.
Lansberg MG, O’Donnell MJ, Khatri P, et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e601S–36.
The Canadian cooperative study group. A randomized trial of Aspirin and Sulfinpyrazone in threatened stroke. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:53–9.
Mohr JP, Tompson JLP, Lazar RM, et al. A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1444–51.
Gorelick PB, Kelly M, Ruland S, Harris Y, Kittner S. Aspirin and ticlopidine for prevention of recurrent stroke in black patients. JAMA. 2014;289(22):2947–57.
Hankey GJ. Secondary stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol. 2013;13(2):178–94.
Savcic M, Hauert J, Bachmann F, Wyld PJ, Geudelin B, Cariou R. Clopidogrel loading dose regimens: kinetic profile of pharmacodynamic response in healthy subjects. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1999;25 Suppl 2:15–9.
Diener H-C, Sacco RL, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel and telmisartan on disability and cognitive function after recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke in the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFE). Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(10):875–84.
Diener H-C, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9431):331–7.
Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, et al. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(1):11–9.
Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, et al. Platelet-oriented inhibition in new TIA and minor ischemic stroke (POINT) trial: rationale and design. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(6):479–83.
CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996;348:1329–39.
Sudlow CLM, Mason G, Maurice JB, Wedderburn CJ, Hankey GJ. Thienopyridine derivatives versus aspirin for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4): CD001246
Wong KSL, Wang Y, Leng X, et al. Early dual versus mono antiplatelet therapy for acute non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2013;128(15):1656–66.
Lau AY, Zhao Y, Chen C, et al. Dual antiplatelets reduce microembolic signals in patients with transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: subgroup analysis of CLAIR study. Int J Stroke. 2013;1–6.
Lee M, Saver JL, Hong KS, Rao NM, Wu YL, Ovbiagele B. Risk–benefit profile of long-term dual-versus single-antiplatelet therapy among patients with ischemic stroke. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:463–70.
Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency After Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01661322
The ESPS group. The European stroke prevention study. Lancet. 1987;2(8572):1351–4.
Diener HC, Cunha L, Forbes C, Sivenius J, Smets P, Lowenthal A. European Stroke Prevention Study. 2. Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke. J Neurol Sci. 1996;143(1–2):1–13.
Leonardi-Bee J, Bath PMW, Bousser M-G, et al. Dipyridamole for preventing recurrent ischemic stroke and other vascular events: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials. Stroke. 2005;36(1):162–8.
Verro P, Gorelick PB, Nguyen D. Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin for prevention of vascular events after stroke or TIA: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2008;39(4):1358–63.
Commentary SM. Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin alone after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): randomised controlled trial. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2007;19(1):87–9.
Halkes PH, Gray LJ, Bath PMW, et al. Dipyridamole plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in secondary prevention after TIA or stroke: a meta-analysis by risk. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(11):1218–23.
Shinohara Y, Katayama Y, Uchiyama S, et al. Cilostazol for prevention of secondary stroke (CSPS 2): an aspirin-controlled, double-blind, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(10):959–68.
Huang Y, Cheng Y, Wu J, et al. Cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin after ischaemic stroke: a randomised, double-blind, pilot study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(6):494–9.
Gent M, Blakely JA, Easton JD, et al. The Canadian American Ticlopidine Study (CATS) in thromboembolic stroke. Lancet. 1989;1(8649):1215–20.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein belong solely to the authors. They are neither those of nor endorsed by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Department of Defense, or any other agency of the federal government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalanuria, A.A., Ling, G. (2016). Heterogeneous Causes of Stroke: Antithrombotics. In: Ovbiagele, B. (eds) Ischemic Stroke Therapeutics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17750-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17750-2_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17749-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17750-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)