Abstract
In June 2014, the authors organized and led a citizen mapping activity for primary and secondary teachers with the dual goal of educating them about ecosystem services of a local river (and its environs) and empowering them as contributors of important social information about the valuation of their local ecosystem. We employed two methods to enable this citizen mapping: an “analog” method, using Mylar sheets, dry-erase markers, and print-outs of a satellite view of the area of interest; and a “digital” method, employing Collector for ArcGIS and related databases to create a community map of ecosystem services in real time. This chapter reports on the similarities and differences in content and style of the resulting maps, and in engagement and behavior of the participants. As citizen-enabled geospatial inquiry (in the form of both contributions and analysis of geographic data) continues to grow, an examination of multiple ways of enabling that inquiry is relevant and required. We conclude that, in the context of an open-ended citizen mapping activity with the intent to empower participants and collect survey-like geo-referenced data, both techniques are recommended to document the phenomenon and attitudes about it most completely.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bonney R, Ballard H, Jordan R, McCallie E, Phillips T, Shirk J, Wilderman CC (2009) Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE inquiry group report. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), Washington DC
Brossard D, Lewenstein B, Bonney R (2005) Scientific knowledge and attitude change: the impact of a citizen science project. Int J Sci Educ 27(9):1099–1121
Craig W, Harris T, Weiner D (eds) (2002) Community participation in geographic information systems. Taylor and Francis, London
Cronje R, Rohlinger S, Crall A, Newman G (2011) Does participation in citizen science improve scientific literacy? a study to compare assessment methods. Appl Environ Educ Commun 10(3):135–145
Dangermond J (2008) GIS and the GeoWeb. ArcNews 30(2):1–21
Elwood S (2008) Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal 72(3–4):173–183
Goodchild M (2007) Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 2:24–32
Hall GB, Chipeniuk R, Feick R, Leahy M, Deparday V (2010) Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and Web 2.0. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(5):761–781
Harley JB (1990) Texts and contexts in the interpretation of early Maps. In: Buisseret D (ed) From sea charts to satellite images: interpreting North American history through maps. U of Chicago, Chicago, pp 3–15
Harris T, Weiner D (1998) Empowerment, marginalization and community-integrated GIS. Cartography Geogr Inf Syst 25(2):67–76
McGonigal J (2011) Reality is broken: why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Press, New York
Newman G, Zimmerman D, Crall A, Laituri M, Graham J, Stapel L (2010) User-friendly web mapping: lessons from a citizen science website. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(12):1851–1869
Sieber R (2006) Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annu Assoc Am Geogr 96(3):491–507
Silverton J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24(9):467–471
Acknowledgments
This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number IIA-1301792. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors wish to thank Carie Green, Rosemary Smith, and Janeen Williams for their collaboration and assistance in the development of the activities and the coordination of the Adventure Learners workshop.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edsall, R.M., Barbour, L., Hoffman, J. (2015). Complementary Methods for Citizen Mapping of Ecosystem Services: Comparing Digital and Analog Representations. In: Robbi Sluter, C., Madureira Cruz, C., Leal de Menezes, P. (eds) Cartography - Maps Connecting the World. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17737-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17738-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)