Skip to main content

Laboratory Models of Free-Surface Flows

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rivers – Physical, Fluvial and Environmental Processes

Part of the book series: GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences ((GEPS))

Abstract

Hydraulic modeling is the classical approach to investigate and describe complex fluid motion. Many empirical formulas in the literature used for the hydraulic design of river training measures and structures have been developed using experimental data from the laboratory. Although computer capacities have increased to a high level which allows to run complex numerical simulations on standard workstation nowadays, non-standard design of structures may still raise the need to perform physical model investigations. These investigations deliver insight into details of flow patterns and the effect of varying boundary conditions. Data from hydraulic model tests may be used for calibration of numerical models as well. As the field of hydraulic modeling is very complex, this chapter intends to give a short overview on capacities and limits of hydraulic modeling in regard to river flows and hydraulic structures only. The reader shall get a first idea of modeling principles and basic considerations. More detailed information can be found in the references.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It must be noted that similar considerations yield the Reynolds number (viscosity), Weber number (surface tension) and Mach number (elasticity) if the gravity force is replaced by the other forces.

  2. 2.

    Note: the Reynolds number is defined as: \({\text{R}} = \rho \times v \times D/\mu.\)

  3. 3.

    For temperature-driven density differences an alternative formulation is given in Riester et al. (1980).

References

  • Aberle J (2015) Hydrodynamics of vegetated channels. In: Rowinski PM, Radecki-Pawlik A (eds) Rivers—physical, fluvial and environmental processes, Springer (this issue), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery ST, Novak P (1978) Oxygen transfer at hydraulic structures. J Hydr Div HY11:1521–1540

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2000) Hydraulic modeling: concepts and practice. Bulletin 7, ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice. American Society of Cicvil Engineers, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2007) Measurement of oxygen transfer in clean water (ASCE standard 2-06). American Society of Cicvil Engineers, Reston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bung DB (2011) Fließcharakteristik und Sauerstoffeintrag bei selbstbelüfteten Gerinneströmungen auf Kaskaden mit gemäßigter Neigung (Flow characteristics and oxygenation in self-aerated skimming flows on embankment cascades, in German). ÖWAW 3–4(2011):76–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Bung DB, Sun Q, Meireles I, Viseu T, Matos J (2012) USBR type III stilling basin performance for steep stepped spillways. In: 4th IAHR symposium on hydraulic structures, Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Bung DB (2013) Non-intrusive detection of air–water surface roughness in self-aerated chute flows. J Hydr Res 51(3):322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chachereau Y, Chanson H (2011) Free-surface fluctuations and turbulence in hydraulic jumps. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 35(6):896–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanson H (1996) Air bubble entrainment in free-surface turbulent shear flows. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanson H (2002) Air-water measurements with intrusive phase-detection probes: can we improve their interpretation? J Hydr Eng 128(3):252–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury MR, Hall RL, Pesantes E (1997) Flow-induced vibration experiments for a 1:25-scale-model flat wicket gate. Technical report SL-97-4, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Waterways Experiment Station, Louisville

    Google Scholar 

  • Essery ITS, Tebutt THY, Rasaratnam SK (1978) Design of spillways for re-aeration of polluted waters. Technical report 72. Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA), Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller V (2011) Scale effects in physical hydraulic engineering models. J Hydr Res 49(3):293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes SA (1993) Advanced series on ocean engineering. In: Liu PL-F (ed) Physical models and laboratory techniques in coastal engineering, vol 7. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (1996) Vibrations of hydraulic equipment for dams: review and recommendations. Bulletin 102, Commission International des Grands Barrages/Committee on hydraulics for dams, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobus H (1980) Hydraulic modelling. Bulletin 7. German Association for Water Resources and Land Improvement. Parey, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobus H (1984) Symposium on scale effects in modelling hydraulic structures. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Hydraulic Engineering Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobus H (1985) An introduction to air-water flows in hydraulics. University of Stuttgart, Hydraulic Engineering Institute, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlurmann T, Bung DB (2012) Experimental investigation of flow-induced radial gate vibrations at Lower Subansiri dam. In: 6th Chinese–German joint symposium on hydraulic and ocean engineering, Keelung

    Google Scholar 

  • Leandro J, Bung DB, Carvalho R (2014) Measuring void fraction and velocity fields of a stepped spillway for skimming flow using non-intrusive methods. Exp Fluids. doi:10.1007/s00348-014-1732-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Oertel M, Bung DB (2012) Characeristics of cross-bar block ramp flows. In: 4th IAHR symposium on hydraulic structures, Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagliara S (2015) Energy dissipation and scouring problems in rivers. In: Rowinski PM, Radecki-Pawlik A (eds) Rivers—physical, fluvial and environmental processes, Springer (this issue), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister M, Chanson H (2012) Discussion of scale effects in physical hydraulic engineering models. J Hydr Res 50(2):244–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riester JB, Bajura RA, Schwarz SH (1980) Effects of water temperature and salt concentration on the characteristics of horizontal buoyant submerged jets. J Heat Transfer 102:557–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toombes L, Chanson H (2005) Air–water mass transfer on a stepped waterway. J Environ Eng 131(10):1377–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS (1966) Jets and plumes with negative or reversing buoyancy. J Fluid Mech 26:779–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelms SC, Gulliver JS (2005) Bubbles and waves description of self-aerated spillway flow. J Hydr Res 43(5):522–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel B. Bung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bung, D.B. (2015). Laboratory Models of Free-Surface Flows. In: Rowiński, P., Radecki-Pawlik, A. (eds) Rivers – Physical, Fluvial and Environmental Processes. GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17719-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics