Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series ((ORCS,volume 57))

  • 783 Accesses

Abstract

Containerized shipping traces its roots back to the 1950s. We describe the origin of the standardized shipping container and how it is used in modern liner shipping networks. We further discuss the structure of such networks and describe laws and regulations regarding the formation and operation of liner shipping services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In shipping parlance, services are sometimes called “strings”. We avoid this term to prevent confusion with programming terminology.

  2. 2.

    The curves are only approximate in order to protect the confidentiality of Maersk Line’s data.

  3. 3.

    Note that partnerships between carriers for cooperation on a service can exist without forming an alliance.

References

  1. Alphaliner: Alphaliner – tOP 100 – existing fleet on September 2014. http://www.alphaliner.com/top100/. Accessed Sept 2014

  2. Avriel, M., Penn, M., Shpirer, N.: Container ship stowage problem: complexity and connection to the coloring of circle graphs. Discret. Appl. Math. 103, 271–279 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartlett, C.: P3 alliance: the best and worst of carrier reliability. SeaTrade Global, Feb 2014. Accessed Sept 2014

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brouer, B.D., Alvarez, J.F., Plum, C.E.M., Pisinger, D., Sigurd, M.M.: A base integer programming model and benchmark suite for liner shipping network design. Transp. Sci. 48(2), 281–312 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Ronen, D.: Ship routing and scheduling: status and perspectives. Transp. Sci. 38(1), 1–18 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cudahy, B.J.: Box Boats: How Container Ships Changed the World. Fordham University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fagerholt, K., Laporte, G., Norstad, I.: Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 61(3), 523–529 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. IHS Global Insight: Valuation of the liner shipping industry: economic contribution and liner industry operations, Dec 2009. http://www.worldshipping.org/pdf/Liner_Industry_Valuation_Study.pdf. Accessed 07 Aug 2014

  9. Imai, A., Shintani, K., Papadimitriou, S.: Multi-port vs. hub-and-spoke port calls by containerships. Transp. Res. E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 45(5), 740–757 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. “K” Line America Inc. CKYHE alliance to be established: evergreen to join existing partners, https://www.kline.co.jp/en/news/detail/1200367_1997.html. Feb 2014

  11. Jorgensen, R.: Slow steaming – the full story. http://www.maersk.com/Innovation/WorkingWithInnovation/Documents/Slow%20Steaming%20-%20the%20full%20story.pdf. A.P. Moller-Maersk Group. Accessed 27 Mar 2013

  12. Kristiansen, T.: UASC, CMA CGM and China shipping to launch new alliance. ShippingWatch Sept 2014. Accessed Sept 2014

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levinson, M.: The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer, J., Stahlbock, R., Voß, S.: Slow steaming in container shipping. In: 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), Maui, pp. 1306–1314. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Notteboom, T.E.: A carrier’s perspective on container network configuration at sea and on land. J. Int. Logist. Trade 1(2), 65–87 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Notteboom, T.E., Vernimmen, B.: The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. J. Transp. Geogr. 17(5), 325–337 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pacino, D.: Fast generation of container vessel stowage plans – using mixed integer programming for optimal master planning and constraint based local search for slot planning. PhD thesis, IT University of Copenhagen, June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  18. Panayides, P.M., Wiedmer, R.: Strategic alliances in container liner shipping. Res. Transp. Econ. 32(1), 25–38 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rickmers Group: Rickmers “Pearl” class 13,100 TEU container vessels. http://www.rickmers.com/fileadmin/rl/download/pdf/pressreleases/13000Naming/100622_Datasheet_13000.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2013

  20. Rodrigue, J.P., Comtois, C., Slack, B.: The Geography of Transport Systems. Routledge, London/New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ronen, D.: Cargo ships routing and scheduling: survey of models and problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 12(2), 119–126 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Song, D.P., Carter, J.: Empty container repositioning in liner shipping. Marit. Policy Manag. 36(4), 291–307 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Steenken, D., Voß, S., Stahlbock, R.: Container terminal operation and operations research – a classification and literature review. OR Spectr. 26(1), 3–49 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Szakonyi, M.: FMC votes to allow G6 expansion. J. Commer. (2014). Accessed Sept 2014

    Google Scholar 

  25. Szakonyi, M.: Maersk CEO looks to avoid P3 repeat by meeting with Chinese regulators. J. Commer. (2014). Accessed Sept 2014

    Google Scholar 

  26. Szakonyi, M.: P3’s demise shrouds the future of mega-alliances in doubt. J. Commer. (2014). Accessed Sept 2014

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tierney, K., Pacino, D., Jensen, R.M.: On the complexity of container stowage planning problems. Under Revision at the J. Discret. Appl. Math. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tierney, K., Voß, S., Stahlbock, R.: A mathematical model of inter-terminal transportation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235(2), 448–460 (2014). Maritime Logistics

    Google Scholar 

  29. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD): Review of Maritime Transport. United Nations, New York/Geneva (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, S., Meng, Q.: Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network. Transp. Res. E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 48(3), 701–714 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tierney, K. (2015). Containerized Shipping. In: Optimizing Liner Shipping Fleet Repositioning Plans. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17665-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics