Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between gender, gender role ideology (GRI) and work-family conflict (WF conflict), both work-to-family (WFC) and family-to-work (FWC) conflict, on a sample of a total of 405 working men and women from two cities – Mumbai and Bengaluru – in India. Hypotheses embedded within the cultural and contextual reality of India and supported by gender role theory were tested using moderated regression analyses for the dependent variables of WFC and FWC. Although some significant differences in conflict of men and women were observed, the results broadly did not support ‘gender role’ explanations for conflict. There was no significant difference in the levels of WFC between men and women, but FWC was significantly higher for women instead of men as hypothesized. As regards gender role ideology, ‘traditionals’ experienced more of WFC and FWC than ‘egalitarians’. With regard to interaction effects, women ‘traditionals’ experienced higher FWC than women and men ‘egalitarians’ and men ‘traditionals’. The results of the study are discussed with reference to the Indian context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
We acknowledge the contribution of the Multi-National Work-Family (Project 3535) research team to the theoretical and empirical conceptualization of this research. The team consists of: Dr. Zeynep Aycan, Dr. Roya Ayman, Dr. Anne Bardoel, Dr. Tripti Desai, Dr. Anat Drach-Zahavy, Dr. Leslie B. Hammer, Dr. Ting-Pang Huang, Dr. Karen Korabik, Dr. Donna S. Lero, Dr. Artiwati Mawardi, Dr. Steven Poelmans, Dr. Ujvala Rajadhyaksha, Dr. Anit Somech, and Dr. Li Zhang.
References
Agullo, B., & Egawa, M. (2009). International careers of Indian workers in Tokyo: Examination and future directions. Career Development International, 14(2), 148–168.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
Anafarta, N. (2011). The relationship between work-family conflict and job satisfaction: A structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(4), 168–177.
Ayman, R., Velgach, S., & Ishaya, N. (2005). Multi-method approach to investigate work-family conflict. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.
Banerjee, S. (2005). Make me a man: Masculinity, hinduism, and nationalism in India. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 354–364.
Boyar, S. L., Maertz, C. P., Pearson, A. W., & Keough, S. (2003). Work-family conflict: A model of linkages between work and family domain variables and turnover intentions. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(2), 175–190.
Bruck, C. S., Allen, T. D., & Spector, P. E. (2002). The relation between work–family conflict and job satisfaction: A finer-grained analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 336–353.
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.
Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000). Work-family conflict in the organization: Do life role values make a difference? Journal of Management, 26(5), 1031–1054.
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2), 249–276.
Casper, W. J., Bordeaux, C., Eby, L. T., Lockwood, A., & Lambert, D. (2007). A review of research methods in IO/OB work-family research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 28–43.
Census of India 2001. Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs.
Chappell, D., Korabik, K., & McElwain, A. (2005). The effects of gender-role attitudes on work-family conflict and work-family guilt. Poster presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Montreal, QC, as cited in Korabik, K., McElwain, A., & Chappell, D. (2008). Integrating gender-related issues into research on work and family. In K. Korabik, D. Lero, & D. Whitehead (Eds.), Handbook of work-family integration: Research, theory, and best practices (pp. 215–232). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Chhokar, J., Brodbeck, F., & House, R. (Eds.). (2007). Culture and leadership across the world: The book of in-depth studies of 25 Societies. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
CIA – The World Factbook – India. Retrieved January 14, 2009, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html
Desai, N. (1996). Women’s employment and their familial role in India. In A. M. Shah, B. S. Baviskar, & E. A. Ramaswamy (Eds.), Social structure and change (Women in Indian society, Vol. 2, pp. 98–112). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2004). Emic and etic characteristics of coping strategies with WFC: The case of Israel. Paper presented at the international congress of cross-cultural psychology, Xi’an, Peoples Republic of China.
Dube, L. (2001). Anthropological explorations in gender: Intersecting fields. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (1991). Gender differences in work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 60–74.
Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Lee, C. (1994). Work-family conflict: A comparison by gender, family type, and perceived control. Journal of Family Issues, 15(3), 449–466.
Eagle, B. W., Miles, E. W., & Icenogle, M. L. (1997). Interrole conflicts and the permeability of work and family domains: Are there gender differences? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 168–184.
Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.
Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178–199.
Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 57–80.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. First edition (Hardcover). New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux Publications.
Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992a). Antecedents and outcomes of work family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65–78.
Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992b). Prevalence of work-family conflict: Are work and family boundaries asymmetrically permeable? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 723–729.
Fu, C. K., & Shaffer, M. A. (2001). The tug of work and family: Direct and indirect domain-specific determinants of work-family conflict. Personnel Review, 30(5), 502–522.
Gibbons, J., Hamby, B., & Dennis, W. (1997). Researching gender-role ideologies internationally and cross-culturally. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 151–170.
Greenhaus, J., & Beutell, N. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.
Greenhaus, J., & Powell, G. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.
Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111–126.
Gupta, D. (Ed.). (2004). Caste in question: Identity or hierarchy? New Delhi: Sage.
Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560–568.
Haines, V. Y., III, & Saba, T. (1999). International mobility policies and practices: Are there gender differences in importance ratings? Career Development International, 4(4), 206–212.
Higgins, C. A., Duxbury, L. E., & Irving, R. H. (1992). Work-family conflict in the dual-career family. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 51–75.
Hill, E. J. (2005). Work-family facilitation and conflict, working fathers and mothers, work-family stressors and support. Journal of Family Issues, 26(6), 793–819.
Hill, E. J., Yang, C., Hawkins, A. J., & Ferris, M. (2004). A cross-cultural test of the work-family interface in 48 countries. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66(5), 1300–1316.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Holahan, C. K., & Gilbert, L. A. (1979). Interrole conflict for working women: Careers versus jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 86–90.
Huffman, A. H., Payne, S. C., & Castro, C. A. (2003). Time demands, work-family conflict and turnover: A comparison of men and women. Poster presented at the 17th annual convention of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL, as cited in Korabik, K., McElwain, A., & Chappell, D. (2008). Integrating gender-related issues into research on work and family. In K. Korabik, D. Lero, & D. Whitehead (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of work-family integration: Research, theory, and best practices (pp. 215–232). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Joplin, J. R., Shaffer, M. A., Francesco, A. M., & Lau, T. (2003). The macro-environment and work-family conflict: Development of a cross-cultural comparative framework. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 3, 305–332.
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley.
Kakar, S. (1978). The inner world: A psychoanalytic study of Hindu childhood and society. New Delhi: Oxford India Paperbacks/Oxford University Press.
Khanna, S. (1992). Life stress among working and non-working women in relation to anxiety and depression. Psychologia, 35, 111–116.
Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S. (1998). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among employed women and men in Finland. Human Relations, 51(2), 157–177.
Kopelman, R. E., Greenhaus, J. H., & Connoly, T. F. (1983). A model of work, family, and interrole conflict: A construct validation study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 198–215.
Korabik, K., Lero, D. S., & Ayman, R. (2003). A multi-level approach to cross cultural work-family research, a micro and macro perspective. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(3), 289–303.
Korabik, K., McElwain, A., & Chappell, D. (2008). Integrating gender-related issues into research on work and family. In K. Korabik, D. Lero, & D. Whitehead (Eds.), Handbook of work-family integration: Research, theory, and best practices (pp. 215–232). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Krishnaraj, M. (2003, October 25–31). Challenges before women’s movement in a changing context. Economic and Political Weekly of India, Review of Women’s Studies, 38(43), 4536–4545.
Luk, D., & Shaffer, M. (2005). Work and family domain stressors and support: Within- and cross-domain influences on work-family conflict. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 489–508.
Mason, K. O., & Bumpass, L. L. (1975). U.S. women’s sex-role ideology, 1970. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1212–1219.
McElwain, A., Korabik, K., & Rosin, H. M. (2005). An examination of gender differences in work-family conflict. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37(4), 269–284, as cited in Korabik, K., McElwain, A., & Chappell, D. (2008). Integrating gender-related issues into research on work and family (pp. 215–232). In K. Korabik, D. Lero, & D. Whitehead (Eds.), Handbook of work-family integration: Research, theory, and best practices. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Mukhopadhyay, S. (1996). Working status and health: A study of Calcutta women. The Indian Journal of Social Work, 57(2), 327–336.
Musselman, J. (2008, May 10). Western gaze: Country of contrasts. Little India.
Parasuraman, S., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2002). Toward reducing some critical gaps in work family research. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 299–312. Retrieved on April 20, 2015, from http://www.littleindia.com/arts-entertainment/2824-western-gaze-country-of-contrast.html
Parasurman, S., & Simmers, C. A. (2001). Type of employment, work-family conflict and well-being: A comparative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 551–568.
Parish, S. M. (1996). Hierarchy and its discontents: Culture and the politics of consciousness in caste society. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Pleck, J. H. (1977). The work-family role system. Social Problems, 24, 417–427.
Pruthi, R., Devi, R., & Pruthi, R. (Eds.). (2003). Indian women: Present status and future prospects. Mangal: Deep Publications.
Rajadhyaksha, U. (2001). Gender differences in conflict between work and home roles among dual career couples. Paper published in the proceedings of the Hawaiian conference on business, June 14–17, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Rajadhyaksha, U. (2004). Sources of non-institutional support and work-family conflict in India. Paper presented at the international congress of the international association for cross-cultural psychology, Xi’an, Peoples Republic of China.
Rajadhyaksha, U., & Smita, S. (2004). Tracing a timeline of work and family research in India. Economic and Political Weekly, XXXIX(17), 1674–1680.
Ramu, G. N. (1989). Women, work and marriage in Urban India: A study of dual and single-earner couples. New Delhi: Sage.
Roy, P. K. (Ed.). (2000). The Indian family: Change and persistence. New Delhi: Gyan Publications.
Sekaran, U. (1984). Job and life satisfaction experienced by dual-career family members. Journal of Psychological Research, 28(3), 139–144.
Sharma, G. L. (2003). Caste, class and social inequality in India, vol. 1 & 2. Jaipur: Mangal Deep.
Thapar, R. (1990). A history of India (Penguin history series, Vol. 1). New Delhi: Penguin Books India (P) Ltd (Original works published 1966).
The 2001 National Work-Life Conflict Study by Chris Higgins and Linda Duxbury, Public Health Agency of Canada. Retrieved on January 14, 2009, from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/work-travail/report1/index-eng.php
The Goldman Sachs Group. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The path to 2050 (Global Economics Paper No. 99). Economic Research from the GS Financial Workbench. Retrieved on January 14, 2009, from https://www.gs.com
Treas & Widmer. (2000). Married women’s employment over the life course: Attitudes in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 78(4), 1409–1437.
Uberoi, P. (Eds.). (2005). Family, kinship and marriage in India. (Reprint). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Voydanoff, P. (2002). Linkages between the work-family interface and work, family, and individual outcomes: An integrative model. Journal of Family Issues, 23(1), 138–164.
Voydanoff, P. (2005). Work demands and work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: Direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 26(6), 707–726.
World Bank. (2008). Poverty – “India at a glance”. World Bank, 9/24/08. Retrieved on January 11, 2009, from http://devdata.worldbank.org/AAG/ind_aag.pdf
Yang, N., Chen, C. C., Choi, J., & Zou, Y. (2000). Sources of work-family conflict: A Sino-US comparison of the effects of work and family demands. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 113–123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rajadhyaksha, U., Velgach, S. (2015). What Is a Better Predictor of Work-Family Conflict in India? – Gender or Gender Role Ideology. In: Mäkelä, L., Suutari, V. (eds) Work and Family Interface in the International Career Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17647-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17647-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17646-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17647-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)