Skip to main content

Approximate Shape Gradients for Interface Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Trends in Shape Optimization

Part of the book series: International Series of Numerical Mathematics ((ISNM,volume 166))

Abstract

Shape gradients of shape differentiable shape functionals constrained to an interface problem (IP) can be formulated in two equivalent ways. Both formulations rely on the solution of two IPs, and their equivalence breaks down when these IPs are solved approximatively. We establish which expression for the shape gradient offers better accuracy for approximations by means of finite elements. Great effort is devoted to provide numerical evidence of the theoretical considerations.

The work of A. Paganini was partly supported by ETH Grant CH1-02 11-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We tacitly assume that the vector field \({\mathcal V}\) vanishes on \(\partial \Omega \) because we are mostly interested in the contribution of the interface.

  2. 2.

    We denote by C a generic constant, which may depend on \(\Omega \), its discretization, the source function f, and the coefficient \(\sigma \). Its value may differ between different occurrences.

  3. 3.

    Repeating the experiments for \(m_i+n_i\le 3\) produces results in agreement with the observations made for \(m_i+n_i\le 5\). Therefore, the arbitrary choice of restricting the sum of the indices to 5 does not seem to compromise our observations.

  4. 4.

    In experiment 1 new meshes are always adjusted to fit the curved interface.

  5. 5.

    The experiments are performed in MATLAB and are based on the library LehrFEM developed at ETHZ. Mesh generation and uniform refinement are performed with the functions initmesh and refinemesh of the MATLAB PDE Toolbox.

References

  1. G. Allaire, Conception optimale de structures (Springer, Berlin, 2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Udawalpola, E. Wadbro, M. Berggren, Optimization of a variable mouth acoustic horn. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 85(5), 591–606 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Bängtsson, D. Noreland, M. Berggren, Shape optimization of an acoustic horn. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 192(11–12), 1533–1571 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Eppler, H. Harbrecht, Coupling of FEM and BEM in shape optimization. Numer. Math. 104(1), 47–68 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Laurain, K, Sturm, Domain expression of the shape derivative and application to electrical impedance tomography. Technical report 1863, Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. Pironneau, Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems (Springer, Berlin, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.C. Delfour, J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries. Metrics, Analysis, Differential Calculus, and Optimization. 2nd edn., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Berggren, A unified discrete-continuous sensitivity analysis method for shape optimization. Applied and Numerical Partial Differential Equations (Springer, Berlin, 2010), pp. 25–39

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.J. Haug, K.K. Choi, V. Komkov, Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems (Academic Press Inc., 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Hiptmair, A. Paganini, S. Sargheini, Comparison of approximate shape gradients. BIT Numer. Math. 55(2), 459–485 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Céa, Conception optimale ou identification de formes: calcul rapide de la dérivée directionnelle de la fonction coût. RAIRO Modél. Math. Anal. Numér. 20(3), 371–402 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Harbrecht, On output functionals of boundary value problems on stochastic domains. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 33(1), 91–102 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Monk, Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations (Clarendon Press, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Monk, E. Süli, The adaptive computation of far-field patterns by a posteriori error estimation of linear functionals. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 36(1), 251–274 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Becker, R. Rannacher, An optimal control approach to a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods. Acta Numer. 10, 1–102 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. S.C. Brenner, L.R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, 3rd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Li, J.M. Melenk, B. Wohlmuth, J. Zou, Optimal a priori estimates for higher order finite elements for elliptic interface problems. Appl. Numer. Math. 60(1–2), 19–37 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Blumenfeld, The regularity of interface-problems on corner-regions. Singularities and Constructive Methods for their Treatment (Oberwolfach, 1983) (Springer, Berlin, 1985), pp. 38–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Paganini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paganini, A. (2015). Approximate Shape Gradients for Interface Problems. In: Pratelli, A., Leugering, G. (eds) New Trends in Shape Optimization. International Series of Numerical Mathematics, vol 166. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17563-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics