Skip to main content

Medicolegal Considerations – The Consent Process

  • Chapter
Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

We have sought to demonstrate what we believe to be better practice in respect of gaining consent. This area of medicine that enables us to gain our patient’s trust and their consent to treat them does not differ from most other areas in medicine. Achieving adequate consent relies fundamentally on good communication between the physician and patient. If informed consent is gained from a conversation between the physician and patient, rather than simply asking for a form to be signed, it is more likely that the patient’s expectation will be met and the prospect of patient disappointment thus reduced. Achieving proper informed consent, in turn, is likely to improve the patient experience and reduces the chance of litigation following an unexpected outcome. Whilst we cannot be prescriptive about exactly how consent for total knee replacement should be undertaken, we have aimed to underline the principles relating to the how, who, where, what and when consent should be obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Faden RR, King NMP (1986) A history and theory of informed consent, Onlineth edn. Oxford University Press, New York. ISBN 0-19-5036867

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolam vs Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 1 WLR 582

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sidaway vs Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital (1985) AC 871

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chester v Afshar (2004) UKHL 41 part II

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pace E (26 August 1997) Gebhard PG, 69, Developer of the term ‘Informed Consent’ – New York Times. The New York Times (New York: NYTC). ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 1 Dec 2014.8. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together (2008) General Medical Council

    Google Scholar 

  6. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together (2008) General Medical Council

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson OA, Wearne IMJ (2007) Informed consent for elective surgery – what is best practice? J R Soc Med 100:97–100

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Atrey A, Leslie I, Carvell J, Gupte C, Shepperd JA, Powell J, Gibb PA, British Orthopaedic Association (2008) Standardised consent forms on the website of the British Orthopaedic Association. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B(90):422–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David I. S. Sweetnam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwarzkopf, R., Sweetnam, D.I.S. (2015). Medicolegal Considerations – The Consent Process. In: Rodríguez-Merchán, E., Oussedik, S. (eds) Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17554-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17554-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17553-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17554-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics