Abstract
Satisfaction from TKA arises from complex interrelated factors. Patients should be provided with adequate information regarding the nature of surgery and expected outcomes, and any discordance between the patient and surgeon expectations should be resolved. Group educational sessions and counselling by trained personnel can help in modifying preoperative variables for a successful outcome. As surgeons, it is our responsibility to provide satisfactory results by selecting appropriate patients, avoiding preventable complications and performing as technically perfect a surgical procedure as we can. A discussion of the risks of surgery and informed consent frequently involves the rare but well-acknowledged risks of sepsis, thromboembolic disease and inadvertent neurovascular injury. The literature tells us a dissatisfied patient is more common than all three together and this merits discussion before surgery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP (2001) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty 16:740–747
Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L (2000) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71:262–267
Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB (2006) The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:35–43
Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN (2008) Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol 35:2415–2418
Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63
Toms AD, Mandalia V, Haigh R, Hopwood B (2009) The management of patients with painful total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:143–150
Riddle DL, Wade JB, Jiranek WA, Kong X (2010) Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:798–806
Forsythe ME, Hennigar AW, Sullivan MJLGM (2008) Prospective relation between catastrophizing and residual pain following knee arthroplasty: two-year. Pain Res Manag 13:335–341
Lundblad H, Kreicbergs A, Jansson KA (2008) Prediction of persistent pain after total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:166–171
Singh JA, Gabriel S, Lewallen D (2008) The impact of gender, age, and preoperative pain severity on pain after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2717–2723
Elson DW, Brenkel IJ (2006) Predicting pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:1047–1053
Ritter MA, Wing JT, Berend ME, Davis KE, Meding JB (2008) The clinical effect of gender on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:331–336
Roth ML, Tripp DA, Harrison MH, Sullivan M, Carson P (2007) Demographic and psychosocial predictors of acute perioperative pain for total knee arthroplasty. Pain Res Manag 12:185–194
Polkowski GG, Ruh EL, Barrack TN, Nunley RM, Barrack RL (2013) Is pain and dissatisfaction after TKA related to early-grade preoperative osteoarthritis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:162–168
Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, Kohl HW, Roberts S, Cook KF et al (2002) What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:172–188
Devers BN, Conditt MA, Jamieson ML, Driscoll MD, Noble PC, Parsley BS (2011) Does greater knee flexion increase patient function and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 26:178–186
Rosenberger PH, Jokl P, Ickovics J (2006) Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:397–405
Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Anne H et al (2002) The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 29:1273–1279
Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, Harden RN, Bruehl S, Stanos SP et al (2003) Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:27–36
Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, Stulberg SD (2007) Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:21–26
Fisher DA, Dierckman B, Watts MR, Davis K (2007) Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2):39–42
Lopez-Olivo MA, Landon GC, Siff SJ, Edelstein D, Pak C, Kallen MA et al (2011) Psychosocial determinants of outcomes in knee replacement. Ann Rheum Dis 70:1775–1781
Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL, Corporation TR, Street M (1991) The MOS Social Support Survey. Soc Sci Med 32:705–714
Lovibond PF, Lovibond S (1995) The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther 33:335–343
Carver CS (1997) You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med 4:92–100
Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R (1978) Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Health Educ Monogr 6:160–170
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coolican, M.R.J. (2015). Aetiology of Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: RodrÃguez-Merchán, E., Oussedik, S. (eds) Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17554-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17554-6_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17553-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17554-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)