Abstract
By international standards, Australia is a wealthy country with a low level of poverty. However, the overall picture hides the substantial gap between the socio-economic status of the Indigenous people – Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders – and other Australians. This relative disadvantage is also reflected in the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in the child welfare system. This chapter considers the effectiveness of child welfare services in addressing the poverty and inequality that underlies this disproportionate representation. First, an overview is provided of the dimensions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander over-representation, its causes and consequences. While poverty is not directly a risk factor for child abuse and neglect, it is linked to many of the individual, family, and community problems that can lead to child welfare involvement. Many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander parents experience difficulties such as poor physical and mental health, family violence, drug and alcohol use, and housing instability that characterise families who come to the attention of child protection authorities. The chapter then discusses policy and programs designed to address Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander over-representation. The causes of disproportionality relate to a mix of individual, family and system factors that are associated with poverty and social disadvantage. However, child protection intervention has tended to concentrate on individual and family risk factors only, rather than the systemic and structural factors associated with poverty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adams, D. (2002). Poverty: A precarious public policy idea. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(4), 89–98.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2013). Child protection Australia: 2011–12 (Child Welfare series no. 55. Cat. no. CWS 43). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. http://www.aihw.gov.au
Bamblett, M., & Lewis, P. (2007). Detoxifying the child and family welfare system for Australian Indigenous peoples: Self determination, rights and culture as the critical tools. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 3(3), 43–56.
Blackstock, C., & Trocme, N. (2005). Community based child welfare for aboriginal children: Supporting resilience through structural change. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 24, 12–33.
Blackstock, C., Trocme, N., & Bennett, M. (2004). Child maltreatment investigations among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal families in Canada. Violence Against Women, 10(8), 901–916.
Boyd, R. (2014). African American disproportionality and disparity in child welfare: Toward a comprehensive conceptual framework. Children and Youth Services Review, 37, 15–27.
Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Sparks, T., & Bos, E. (2014). Inequalities in child welfare intervention rates: The intersection of deprivation and identity. Child and Family Social Work, advance online publication, doi:10.1111/cfs.12161.
Chand, A., & Thoburn, J. (2006). Child protection referrals and minority ethnic children and families. Child and Family Social Work, 11(4), 168–177.
Council of Australian Governments. (2014). Closing the gap in Indigenous disadvantage. https://www.coag.gov.au/closing_the_gap_in_indigenous_disadvantage
Courtney, M., Barth, R. P., Duerr Berrick, J., Brooks, D., Needell, B., & Park, L. (1996). Race and child welfare services: Past research and future directions. Child Welfare, 75(2), 99–137.
Cross, T. A., Earle, K. A., & Simmons, S. (2000). Child abuse and neglect in Indian country: Policy issues. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 81(1), 49–58.
Donald, K. L., Bradley, L., Day, P., Crichley, R., & Nuccio, K. E. (2003). Comparison between American Indian and non-Indian out-of-home placements. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 84(2), 267–274.
Earle, K. A., & Cross, A. (2001). Child abuse and neglect among Indian/Alaska native children: An analysis of existing data. Seattle: Casey Family Programs.
Healing Foundation. (2013). Our children. Our dreaming: A call for more just approaches for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and families. http://www.snaicc.org.au/_uploads/rsfil/02994.pdf
Hill, R. B. (2006). Synthesis of research on disproportionality in child welfare: An update. Seattle: Casey Family Programs.
Hines, A. M., Lemon, K., Wyatt, P., & Merdinger, J. (2004). Factors related to the disproportionate involvement of children of color in the child welfare system: A review and emerging themes. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 507–527.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. (1997). Bringing them home: Report of the national inquiry into the separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families. Sydney: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.
Hunter, B. (2012). Is Indigenous poverty different from other poverty? In B. Hunter & N. Biddle (Eds.), Survey analysis for Indigenous policy in Australia: Social science perspectives (CAEPR Research Monograph No. 21, pp. 193–222). Canberra: ANU E Press.
Lemon, K., D’Andrade, A., & Austin, M. J. (2005). Understanding and addressing disproportionality in the front end of the child welfare system. Berkeley: Bay Area Social Services Consortium.
Libesman, T. (2004). Child welfare approaches for Indigenous communities: International perspectives. Child Abuse Prevention Issues, 20, 1–39.
Miller, M. (2008). Racial disproportionality in Washington State’s child welfare system. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Document no. 08-06-3901.
Needell, B., Brookhart, M. A., & Lee, S. (2003). Black children and foster care placement in California. Children and Youth Services Review, 25(5/6), 393–408.
Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage: Key indicators 2011: Overview. Canberra: Productivity Commission. http://www.pc.gov.au/gsp/overcoming-indigenous-disadvantage/key-indicators-2011
Queensland Child Protection Commission of Inquiry. (2013). Taking responsibility: A roadmap for Queensland child protection. http://www.childprotectioninquiry.qld.gov.au/publications
Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. (2011).
Thoburn, J., Chand, A., & Procter, J. (2005). Child welfare services for minority ethnic families: The research reviewed. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Trocme, N., Knoke, D., & Blackstock, C. (2004). Pathways to the over-representation of Aboriginal children in Canada’s child welfare system. Social Service Review, 78(4), 577–601.
Wulczyn, F. (2003). Closing the gap: Are changing exit patterns reducing the time African American children spend in foster care relative to Caucasian children? Children and Youth Services Review, 25(5/6), 431–462.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tilbury, C. (2015). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Families in Australia: Poverty and Child Welfare Involvement. In: Fernandez, E., Zeira, A., Vecchiato, T., Canali, C. (eds) Theoretical and Empirical Insights into Child and Family Poverty. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17506-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17506-5_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17505-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17506-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)