Skip to main content

Appropriate Measurement Tools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lean Management Beyond Manufacturing
  • 6451 Accesses

Abstract

Any investigation should involve primary research in order to validate or refute the findings. This book is no different; however, it is important to illustrate the methodology which was adopted and the rationale for this. The methodology used intended to substantiate the judgments of Saunders et al. (Research Methods for Business Students. Prentice Hall, London, 2003). It was decided to investigate the issue under question from diverse viewpoints in order to secure validity, credibility, and triangulation. It was considered fundamental to utilise a variety of research methods and techniques. In an effort to obtain validity and reliability, two discrete data capture mechanisms were utilised. Predominantly, the data were secured through comprehensive survey questionnaires and case studies undertaken in 15 manufacturing companies; this was consequently supplemented by a thorough international case study in order to try and validate the findings. Remenyi et al. (Doing Research in Business and Management, Sage, London, 2000) proposed that an enhanced level of validity and reliability is sought through the use of a varied methodological approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, V. (2007). Research methods in HRM. London: CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIPD. (2005). Skills analysis in manufacturing. http://www.branchwebs.cipd.co.uk/clondon/Education.htm. Accessed 21 Nov 2014

  • Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2003). Business research. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, J., & Hussey, R. (1997). Business Research. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lings, I., & Lee, N. (2008). Doing business research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A., & Swartz, E. (2000). Doing research in business and management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research methods for business students. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2010). Essentials of business research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1993) Applications of Case Study Research - Design and Methods. Beverley Hills:  Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Bhasin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhasin, S. (2015). Appropriate Measurement Tools. In: Lean Management Beyond Manufacturing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17410-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17410-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17409-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17410-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics