Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economic Forces Against Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility: On Intended Overuse of Natural Resources

  • Chapter
Sustainable Development and CSR in China

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

This chapter discusses the phenomenon of Manipulated Durability and Maintainability of goods (MDM). It is argued that it is driven by economic forces in favor of short term economic effects of companies, while sacrificing interest of customers and society, as well as sustainability. Hence it is in opposition to the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). A holistic conceptualization of MDM is presented, which provides a basis for systemic and sectional countermeasures against it. It considers insights from analysis of economic theory, customer and social interests, sustainability aspects, and existing regulations and policies. The systemic component addresses the settings of economic system. It is based upon the idea of Pigouvian taxations and focuses depletion of non-renewable resources together with renewal of the others. Effectiveness and practicality of its use is emphasized by mimicking VAT and CIT taxations. The sectional component incorporates a wide but consistent range of various policies. An emphasis herein is given to completeness and synergy of the whole set. The distinctive novelty of the proposal is in addressing the whole socio-eco-economic complexity of the studied phenomenon and its context. It is also argued that the EU and China are particular regions of the world with regard to the topic due to the proven goodwill and power, at least at the top levels of governance, concerning policies and regulations in relation to the topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamson, G. (2005). Industrial strength design: How brooks stevens shaped your world. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, T. S., Lightfoot, H. W., Evans, S., Neely, A., Greenough, R., Peppard, J., et al. (2007). State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Journal on Engineering Manufacture, 221(10), 1543–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B. M. (1999). Designing the green supply chain. Logistics Information Management, 12(4), 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beder, S. (1998). Is planned obsolescence socially responsible? Engineers Australia, 11, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhamra, T. A. (2004). Ecodesign: The search for new strategies in product development. Journal on Engineering Manufacture, 218(5), 557–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J. (1986). An economic theory of planned obsolescence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4), 729–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D., Schudeleit, T., Posselt, G., & Thiedeb, S. (2013). A state-of-the-art review and evaluation of tools for factory sustainability assessment. Procedia 2nd CIRP Global Web Conference (Vol. 9, pp. 85–90). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1972). Durability and monopoly. Journal of Law & Economics, 15(1), 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farbek, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. (Ed.). (1997). Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Wainger, L., Folke, C., & Mäler, K.-G. (1993). Modeling complex ecological economic systems. BioScience, 43(8), 545–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despeisse, M., Ball, P. D., Evans, S., & Levers, A. (2012). Industrial ecology at factory level – A prototype methodology. Journal on Engineering Manufacture, 226(10), 1648–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMAF). (2012). Towards the circular economy. Opportunities for the consumer goods sector. Cowes: EMAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkman, S. (1997). Industrial ecology: A historical view. Journal of Clean Production, 5(1–2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EUR-Lex. (2012). Directory of European Union legislation in force. Retrieved September 1, 2013 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/browse/directories/legislation.html.

  • European Commission, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development of United Nations, World Bank (EC/OECD/WB). (2013). System of environmental-economic accounting 2012. Experimental Ecosystem Accounting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat/European Commission (ESTAT/EC). (2010). Environmental statistics and accounts in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdows, K., & de Meyer, A. (1990). Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory. Journal of Operations Management, 9(2), 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, A., Gandal, N., & Shy, O. (1993). Planned obsolescence as an engine to the technological progress. Journal of Industrial Economics, 41(4), 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garetti, M., & Taisch, M. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing: Trends and research challenges. Production Planning & Control, 23(2–3), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, P. M. (1947). A theory of purposeful obsolescence. Southern Economic Journal, 14(1), 24–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiltinan, J. (2009). Creative destruction and destructive creations: Environmental ethics and planned obsolescence. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. W., Macauley, M. K. (1998). Competition and car longevity. Discussion paper no. 98–20. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindle, T. (2008). Guide to management ideas and gurus (p. 261). London: Economist/Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMSA. (2013). Unleashing the power of the circular economy. IMSA report for circle economy (p. 2013). Amsterdam: IMSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovane, F., Yoshikawa, H., Alting, L., Boër, C. R., Westkämper, E., Williams, D., et al. (2008). The incoming global technological and industrial revolution towards competitive sustainable manufacturing. CIRP Annals on Manufacturing Technology, 57(2), 641–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. K., Malhotra, A., & Lee, D. (2001). Assessing life-cycle environmental impact: Methodology to spur design of greener products and processes. In J. Sarkis (Ed.), Greener manufacturing and operations: From design to delivery and back (pp. 223–242). Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Latouche, S. (2009). Farewell to growth. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, B. (1932). Ending the depression through planned obsolescence. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, R. T. (1984). Remanufacturing, Technology Review, 87(2), 19–23, 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbach, B. (2004). The durapolist puzzle: Monopoly power in durable-goods market. Yale Journal on Regulation, 21(1), 67–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. V. (1993). Environmentally conscious manufacturing. Manufacturing Engineering, 111(4), 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M. (2005). The McDonaldization, Disneyfication and Colazation of Society or Chinazation. Proceedings of the Symposium of Education Forum for Asia (pp. 258–260).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M. A., & Kishawy, H. A. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing and design: Concepts, practices and needs. Sustainability, 4, 154–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusinko, A. (2007). Green manufacturing: An evaluation of environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(3), 445–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J. (1998). Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices. European Journal of Operations Research, 107(1), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W.-P., & Taylor, A. (2013). Ford of Europe’s product sustainability index. Proceedings of the 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering (pp. 5–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, G. (2006). Made to break: Technology and obsolescence in America. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag, V. (2000). Sustainability – In light of competitiveness. Ecological Economics, 34(1), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahel, W. R. (2011). Sustainable taxation creates regional jobs in a circular economy. Retrieved from http://www.worldresourcesforum.org/files/file/WRF2011_Walter_Stahel_PS4_20Sept.pdf.

  • Stiglitz, J. (1991). The invisible hand and modern welfare economics. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. 3641. Cambridge: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Székely, F., & Knirsch, M. (2005). Leadership and corporate responsibility metrics for sustainable corporate performance. European School of Management and Technology, working paper series on responsible leadership and sustainability, no. esmt CRLSF # 1, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC). (2013). The EESC calls for a total ban on planned obsolescence. Press release no. 61/2013, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • The People’s Republic of China (PRC). (2009). The circular economy promotion law of the People’s Republic of China (entered into force as of January 1, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valli, R. (2014). China revises environmental law, Voice of America, Hong Kong, 25.IV.2014. http://www.voanews.com/content/china-revises-environmental-law-to-address-pollution-problems/1900981.html. Accessed 29 May 2014.

  • Welford, R. (2003). Beyond systems: A vision for corporate environmental management for the future. International Journal of Environment Sustainable Development, 2(2), 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westkämper, E., Alting, L., & Arndt, G. (2001). Life cycle management and assessment: Approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing. Journal on Engineering Manufacture, 215(5), 599–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank and the Development Research Center of the State Council, P. R. China. (2013). China 2030: Building a modern, harmonious, and creative society. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Deng, Y., Huang, J., Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2013). Incentives and outcomes: China’s environmental policy. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. 18754, Cambridge: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Z., Bi, J., & Moriguichi, Y. (2006). The circular economy - A new development strategy in china. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1–2), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2012). Delivering environmentally sustainable economic growth: the case of China. Asia Society, 9/2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K., Wen, Z., & Peng, L. (2007). Environmental policies in China: Evolvement, features and evaluation (in Chinese). China Population, Resources and Environment, 17(2), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

    Stanisław Strzelczak

Authors
  1. Stanisław Strzelczak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanisław Strzelczak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Cologne Business School (CBS), Cologne, Germany

    René Schmidpeter

  2. Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Hualiang Lu

  3. German Graduate School of Management and Law, Heilbronn, Germany

    Christopher Stehr

  4. Peking University, Shenzen, China

    Haifeng Huang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strzelczak, S. (2015). Economic Forces Against Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility: On Intended Overuse of Natural Resources. In: Schmidpeter, R., Lu, H., Stehr, C., Huang, H. (eds) Sustainable Development and CSR in China. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17371-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation