Skip to main content

Using Random Butterfly Transformations to Avoid Pivoting in Sparse Direct Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
High Performance Computing for Computational Science -- VECPAR 2014 (VECPAR 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8969))

Abstract

We consider the solution of sparse linear systems using direct methods via LU factorization. Unless the matrix is positive definite, numerical pivoting is usually needed to ensure stability, which is costly to implement especially in the sparse case. The Random Butterfly Transformations (RBT) technique provides an alternative to pivoting and is easily parallelizable. The RBT transforms the original matrix into another one that can be factorized without pivoting with probability one. This approach has been successful for dense matrices; in this work, we investigate the sparse case. In particular, we address the issue of fill-in in the transformed system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, E., Bai, Z., Dongarra, J.J., Greenbaum, A., McKenney, A., Du Croz, J., Hammarling, S., Demmel, J.W., Bischof, C., Sorensen, D.: LAPACK: a portable linear algebra library for high-performance computers. In: Proceedings of the 1990 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amestoy, P.R., Guermouche, A., L’Excellent, J.-Y., Pralet, S.: Hybrid scheduling for the parallel solution of linear systems. Parallel Comput. 32(2), 136–156 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Baboulin, M., Dongarra, J.J., Hermann, J., Tomov, S.: Accelerating linear system solutions using randomization techniques. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 39(2), 1–13 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baboulin, M., Becker, D., Dongarra, J.J.: A parallel tiled solver for dense symmetric indefinite systems on multicore architectures. In: Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baboulin, M., Becker, D., Bosilca, G., Danalis, A., Dongarra, J.J.: An efficient distributed randomized algorithm for solving large dense symmetric indefinite linear systems. Parallel Comput. 40(7), 213–223 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker, D., Baboulin, M., Dongarra, J.: Reducing the amount of pivoting in symmetric indefinite systems. In: Wyrzykowski, R., Dongarra, J., Karczewski, K., Waśniewski, J. (eds.) PPAM 2011. LNCS, vol. 7203, pp. 133–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blackford, L., Choi, J., Cleary, A., D’Azevedo, E., Demmel, J.W., Dhillon, I., Dongarra, J.J., Hammarling, S., Henry, G., Petitet, A., Stanley, K., Walker, D., Whaley, R.: ScaLAPACK Users’ Guide. SIAM, Philadelphia (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bosilca, G., Bouteiller, A., Danalis, A., Herault, T., Lemarinier, P., Dongarra, J.J.: DAGuE: a generic distributed DAG engine for high performance computing. Parallel Comput. 38(1&2), 37–51 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Demmel, J.W., Eisenstat, S.C., Gilbert, J.R., Li, X.S., Liu, J.W.H.: A supernodal approach to sparse partial pivoting. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 20(3), 720–755 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Duff, I.S., Erisman, I.M., Reid, J.K.: Direct Methods for Sparse Matrices. Oxford University Press, London (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Duff, I.S., Koster, J.: The design and use of algorithms for permuting large entries to the diagonal of sparse matrices. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 20(4), 889–901 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. George, A., Ng, E.: Symbolic factorization for sparse Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 8(6), 877–898 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Higham, N.J.: Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms. SIAM, Philadelphia (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, X.S., Demmel, J.W.: SuperLU_DIST: a scalable distributed-memory sparse direct solver for unsymmetric linear systems. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 29(9), 110–140 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker, D.S.: Explicit formulas for the results of Gaussian elimination, Technical report CSD-950025, UCLA Computer Science Department (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parker, D.S.: Random butterfly transformations with applications in computational linear algebra, Technical report CSD-950023, UCLA Computer Science Department (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. PLASMA users’ guide, parallel linear algebra software for multicore architectures, Version 2.3 (2010). University of Tennessee

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riedy, E.J.: Making static pivoting scalable and dependable, Technical report, UC Berkeley, EECS-2010-172 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schenk, O., Gärtner, K.: Solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equations with PARDISO. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 20, 476–487 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomov, S., Dongarra, J.J., Baboulin, M.: Towards dense linear algebra for hybrid GPU accelerated manycore systems. Parallel Comput. 36(5&6), 232–240 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Stott Parker for insightful discussions about the one-sided transformation. Partial support for this work was provided through Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program funded by U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research (and Basic Energy Sciences/Biological and Environmental Research/High Energy Physics/Fusion Energy Sciences/Nuclear Physics). We used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, which is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François-Henry Rouet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baboulin, M., Li, X.S., Rouet, FH. (2015). Using Random Butterfly Transformations to Avoid Pivoting in Sparse Direct Methods. In: Daydé, M., Marques, O., Nakajima, K. (eds) High Performance Computing for Computational Science -- VECPAR 2014. VECPAR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8969. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17353-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17353-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17352-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17353-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics