Skip to main content

Performance Criteria and Assessment of Vendors in Government Sponsored Entrepreneur Development Programme

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the 1997 World Marketing Congress

Abstract

In Entrepreneur Development Programme, vendor rating is important not only in supplier selection and in deciding how to allocate business but also determine where scare development effort is best-applied. The paper reviews current methods for vendor rating and finds them wanting. It illustrates a new approach based on the use of Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy process method, which was developed to assist in multi-criteria decision problems. The new method overcomes the difficulties associated with the categorical and simple linear weighted criteria ranking methods. It provides a more systematic way of deriving the weights to he used and for scoring the performance of vendors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belton, V. and Gear, T. (1983), “On a short coming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies”. Omega, 11: 228-230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W.D.and Johnston. DA. (1992). “Evaluating Suppliers of Complex Systems: A Multiple Criteria Approach”, Journal of Operational Research Society, 43:1055-1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S.I. (1977). “A total system for measuring delivery performance”. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. 22 -2 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, G.W. (1966), “An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions”. Journal of Purchasing 2/1:517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.S. (1990). “Remarks on the analytic hierarchies process”, Management Science, 36: 249-258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golany, B. and Kress, M. (1993), “A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ration-scale matrices”, European Journal of Operational Research Vol 69: 210-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.E. (1968), “Source selection: A matric Approach” Journal of purchasing and material management: 24-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, P.T. and Vargas, L.G. (1987), “ The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process”. Management Science, 33:1383-1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker, P.T. and Vargas, L.G. (1990), “ Reply to Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science. 36: 269-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, S.K. (1995). “A Preference Based Interpretation of AHP” Omega International Journal Management Science, 23/4:453-462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberson, L.R., Diederich D. and Wuori, J. (1976), “Quantitative vendor evaluation”. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 19-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R. (1983), “An analytical approach to supplier selection”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. J. (1978), “A vendor delivery rating model”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 12-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty. T.L. (1990), “How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal of Operational Research, 48: 9-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. (1990a), “Exposition of AHP in Reply to Dyer”, Management Science, 36: 259

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. (1994),“Highlights and critical point in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal of Operational Research, 74:426-447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, E. (1986). “An approach to vendor approach evaluation”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 2-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, L.G. (1990), “An overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and its applications”, European Journal of Operational Research 48:2-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, L.G. (1994), “Reply to Schenkerman’s avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision support models”, European Journal of Operational Research, 74: 420-425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber C.A., Curren J.R. and Benton W. C. (1991) “Vendor selection criteria and methods”. European Journal of Operational Research. 50: 2-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind, Y., and Robinson, P.J. (1968), “The determinants of vendor selection: The evaluation function anoroach”, Journal of Purchasing and materials Management, 29-41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yahya, S., Kingsman, B.G. (2015). Performance Criteria and Assessment of Vendors in Government Sponsored Entrepreneur Development Programme. In: Sidin, S., Manrai, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 1997 World Marketing Congress. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17320-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics