Skip to main content

A Cross-Cultural Examination of a Scale to Measure Trait Aspects of Vanity

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the 1997 World Marketing Congress

Abstract

Vanity is a concept discussed widely in the social sciences yet very little research has examined this construct in marketing. This study reports a psychometric analysis testing the cross cultural applicability of a vanity scale developed by Netemeyer, Burton and Lichtenstein (1995). The results of the statistical analysis using dimensionality and internal consistency estimates suggest that the scale has cross cultural applicability. Implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belk, R.W. (1985), “Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in a Material World,” Journal of Consumer Research. 13 (December), 265-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1990), “Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Equation Models,” Psychological Bulletin. 107 (March), 238-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durvasula, S., J.C. Andrews, S. Lysonski, and R. Netemeyer (1993), “Assessing the Cross National Applicability of Consumer Behavior Models: A Model of Attitude Toward Advertising in General,” Journal of Consumer Research. 19 (March). 626-636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes and D. Larcker (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research. 18 (February), 39-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer, R., S., Durvasula, and D. R. Lichtenstein (1991), “A Cross-National Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the CETSCALE,” Journal of Marketing Research. 28 (August), 320-327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer, R., S. Burton and D. R. Lichtenstein (1995), “Trait Aspects of Vanity: Measurement and Relevance to Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, (March), 612-625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. and S. Dawson (1992), “A ConsumeValueOrientation for Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation,” Journal of Consumer Research. 19 (December), 303-316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Durvasula, S., Lysonski, S., Watson, J. (2015). A Cross-Cultural Examination of a Scale to Measure Trait Aspects of Vanity. In: Sidin, S., Manrai, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 1997 World Marketing Congress. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17320-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics