Abstract
The challenges of globalisation, technological progress and limited world resources that are typical of elevated consumption must be necessarily addressed in a manner that reflects both socio-economic and environmental problems. One relevant approach to these problems is represented by so-called sustainable economics. This approach cannot address traditional measures of economic performance such as GDP or GNP and requires a new methodology for the measurement of socio-economic activities in the environmental context. In this chapter, we present widely used indicators of sustainable development, namely, the Better Life Index, the Ecological Footprint, the Happy Planet Index, and the Environmental Performance Index. The content and appropriate uses of these indices in the EU countries are discussed, devoting special attention to the CEE countries. We also investigate relationships among those indices. Based on a quantitative analysis, we identify clusters of EU countries with similar levels of sustainable development. Furthermore, we classify the EU countries according to their effective use of natural resources relative to economic output.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Countries: V4: Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia; CEEC: Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia; Periphery: Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain; Core: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom.
References
Abdallah S, Michaelson J, Shah S, Stoll L, Marks N (2012) The happy planet index: 2012 report. A global index of sustainable well-being (nef: London). Available online at: www.happyplanetindex.org/
Allen K (1999) DEA in the ecological context – an overview. In: Westermann G (ed) Data envelopment analysis in the service sector. Harzer wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Schriften, pp 203–235
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30:1078–1092
Bell S, Morse S (2003) Measuring sustainability: learning from doing. Earthscan, London. ISBN 978-1-85383-843-9
Bell S, Morse S (2008) Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable? Earthscan, London. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6
Böhringer C, Jochem P (2007) Measuring the Immeasurable: a survey of sustainability indices. ZEW discussion paper no. 06–073, Available online at: ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp06073.pdf
Costanza R, Hart M, Posner S, Talberth J (2009) Beyond GDP: the need for new measures of progress. The Pardee papers, No. 4, Boston University, Jan 2009
de Sherbinin A, Reuben A, Levy M, Johnson L (2013) Indicators in practice: how environmental indicators are being used in policy and management contexts. Yale/Columbia University, New Haven/New York
Dyckhoff H, Allen K (2001) Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 132:312–325
Ebert U, Welsch H (2004) Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach. J Environ Econ Manag 47:270–283
Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M (2001) Cluster analysis. Oxford University Press, New York
Färe R, Grosskopf S (2004) Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment. Eur J Oper Res 157:242–245
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Tyteca D (1996) An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecol Econ 18:161–175
Global Footprint Network (2012) National footprint accounts, 2012 edn. Available online at http://www.footprintnetwork.org
Goossens Y, Mäkipää A (2007) Alternative progress indicators to gross domestic product (GDP) as a means towards sustainable development. European Parliament, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, Brussels
Halkos GE, Papageorgiou G (2014) Spatial environmental efficiency indicators in regional waste generation: a nonparametric approach, MPRA paper no. 53400. Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/53400/
Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG (2014) Measuring the effect of Kyoto protocol agreement on countries’ environmental efficiency in CO2 emissions: an application of conditional full frontiers. J Prod Anal. doi:10.1007/s11123-013-0343-1
Hediger W (2000) Sustainable development and social welfare. Ecol Econ 32(3):481–492. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00117-2
Hsu A, Johnson LA, Lloyd A (2013) Measuring progress: a practical guide from the developers of the environmental performance index (EPI). Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New Haven. Available: http://epi.yale.edu/content/measuring-progress-practical-guide-developers-environmental-performance-index-epi
Hsu A, Emerson J, Levy M, de Sherbinin A, Johnson L, Malik O, Schwartz J, Jaiteh M (2014) The 2014 environmental performance index. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New Haven. Available: www.epi.yale.edu
Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis, vol XXIX, 2nd edn, Springer series in statistics. Springer, New York, 487 p. ISBN 978-0-387-95442-4
Korhonen PJ, Luptacik M (2004) Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: an extension of data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 154:437–446
Kuznets S (1934) National income 1929–1932. A report to the U.S. Senate, 73rd congress, 2nd Session. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Mandal SK, Madheswaran S (2010) Environmental efficiency of the Indian cement industry: an interstate analysis. Energy Policy 38:1108–1118
McNie C (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Pol 10(1):17–38
OECD (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators. OECD, Paris
OECD (2013) How’s life? 2013: measuring well-being. OECD, Pairs. ISBN 978-92642-0139-2
OECD Better Life Initiative (2014) OECD better life index. Available online at: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/
Ramanathan R (2003) An introduction to data envelopment analysis: a tool for performance measurement. Sage, New Delhi
Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4(2):121–130
Smith R (2007) Development of the SEEA 2003 and Its Implementation. Ecol Econ 61(4):592–599
Stiglitz J E, Sen A, Fitoussi J P (2009) Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Available online at: www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/
Stirling A (1999) The appraisal of sustainability: some problems and possible responses. Local Environ 4(2):111–135
United Nations (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development, General assembly resolution 42/187, 11 Dec 1987. Retrieved 14 Nov 2007
United Nations (1994) Agenda 21.United Nations, US
Wackernagel M (1994) Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: a tool for planning toward sustainability, Ph.D. thesis. School of Community and Regional Planning, Vancouver. The University of British Columbia. OCLC 41839429. Supervisor: W. Rees
Zaim O (2004) Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework. Ecol Econ 48:37–47
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Econ 30:1–14
Zofio JL, Prieto AM (2001) Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries. Resour Energy Econ 23:63–83
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hampel, D., Issever Grochová, L., Janová, J., Kabát, L., Střelec, L. (2016). Sustainable Development in the EU. In: Huber, P., Nerudová, D., Rozmahel, P. (eds) Competitiveness, Social Inclusion and Sustainability in a Diverse European Union. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17299-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17299-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17298-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17299-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)