Skip to main content

Abstract

Young women with breast cancer face the risk of treatment-related infertility as part of their disease management. Uncertainty about future fertility adds significant distress particularly in those women who have not completed their family planning before diagnosis. Anticancer treatments can impact gonadal function both through direct cytotoxic damage on ovarian follicles and endocrine interactions. To a lesser extent, radiotherapy and surgery can also negatively influence fertility in these patients. We will summarize and discuss the mechanisms of gonadal damage from cytotoxic and endocrine therapy, radiotherapy and surgery, and the available methods of fertility assessment during and after treatment completion. We will also describe the psychosocial impact of fertility impairment and briefly address fertility concerns and management in patients with advanced breast cancer, a field still surrounded by enduring taboos and lack of information and data. Specificities of BRCA mutation carriers and contraception methods during and after breast cancer treatment will finally be described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hery C, Ferlay J, Boniol M, et al. Quantification of changes in breast cancer incidence and mortality since 1990 in 35 countries with Caucasian-majority populations. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1187–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Azim Jr HA, Michiels S, Bedard PL, et al. Elucidating prognosis and biology of breast cancer arising in young women using gene expression profiling. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(5):1341–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Merlo DF, Ceppi M, Filiberti R, et al. Breast cancer incidence trends in European women aged 20–39 years at diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:363–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Copson E, Eccles E, Maishman T, et al. Prospective observational study of breast cancer treatment outcomes for UK women aged 18–40 years at diagnosis: the POSH study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:978–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cancello G, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N, et al. Prognosis and adjuvant treatment effects in selected breast cancer subtypes of very young women (\35 years) with operable breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(10):1974–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pagani O, Goldhirsch A. Breast cancer in young women: climbing for progress in care and knowledge. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2006;2(5):717–32. doi:10.2217/17455057.2.5.717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trivers KF, Fink AK, Partridge AH, et al. Estimates of young breast cancer survivors at risk for infertility in the U.S. Oncologist. 2014;19(8):814–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruddy KJ, Gelber SI, Tamimi RM, et al. Prospective study of fertility concerns and preservation strategies in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(11):1151–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pagani O, Ruggeri M, Manunta S et al. Pregnany after breast cancer: are young patients willing to partecipate in clinical studies? Breast. 2015;S0960-9776(15)00006–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oktem O, Oktay K. Quantitative assessment of the impact of chemotherapy on ovarian follicle reserve and stromal function. Cancer. 2007;110:2222–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meirow D, Dor J, Kaufman B, et al. Cortical fibrosis and blood-vessels damage in human ovaries exposed to chemotherapy. Potential mechanisms of ovarian injury. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1626–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morgan S, Anderson RA, Gourley C, et al. How do chemotherapeutic agents damage the ovary? Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:525–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung M, Shin H, Rha S, et al. The clinical outcome of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in premenopausal young patients with breast cancer with long-term follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3259–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fornier MN, Modi S, Panageas KS, et al. Incidence of chemotherapy induced, long-term amenorrhea in patients with breast carcinoma age 40 years and younger after adjuvant anthracycline and taxane. Cancer. 2005;104:1575–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Minton SE, Munster PN. Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea and fertility in women undergoing adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Cancer Control. 2002;9(6):466–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abusief ME, Missmer SA, Ginsburg ES, et al. The effects of paclitaxel, dose density, and trastuzumab on treatment-related amenorrhea in premenopausal women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(4):791–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Partridge A, Gelber S, Gelber RD, et al. Age of menopause among women who remain premenopausal following treatment for early breast cancer: long-term results from international breast cancer study group trials V and VI. EJC. 2007;43:1646–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodiguez Wallberg KA, Oktay K. Fertility preservation and pregnancy in women with and without BRCA mutation–positive breast cancer. Oncologist. 2012;17:1409–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson RA, Rosendahl M, Kelsey TW, et al. Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(16):3404–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oakman C, Viale G, Di Leo A. Management of triple negative breast cancer. Breast. 2010;19(5):312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meirow D, Nugent D. The effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on female reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(6):535–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. National Cancer Institute: FDA approval for bevacizumab. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/druginfo/fda-bevacizumab

  23. Zhao J, Liu J, Chen K, et al. What lies behind chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea for breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;145(1):113–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Joerger M. Metabolism of the taxanes including nab-paclitaxel. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2014;14:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Burstein HJ, Temin S, Anderson H, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(21):2255–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Partridge AH, Pagani O, Abulkhair O, et al. First international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY1). Breast. 2014;23(3):209–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Francis PA, Regan MM, Fleming GF, et al. Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1412379.

  28. Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley BA, et al. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(2):107–18.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, et al. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;381:805–16.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gray RG, Rea D, Handley K, et al. aTTom: Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years in 6,953 women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(suppl):abstr 5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hughes LL, Gray RJ, Solin LJ, et al. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; Southwest Oncology Group; Cancer and Leukemia Group B; North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Efficacy of radiotherapy for ovarian ablation: results of a breast intergroup study. Cancer. 2004;101(5):969–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McDonald Wade 3rd S, Hackney MH, et al. Ovarian suppression in the management of premenopausal breast cancer: methods and efficacy in adjuvant and metastatic settings. Oncology. 2008;75(3–4):192–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bese NS, Iribas A, Dirican A, et al. Ovarian ablation by radiation therapy: is it still an option for the ablation of ovarian function in endocrine responsive premenopausal breast cancer patients? Breast. 2009;18(5):304–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jordan VC, Fritz NF, Langan-Fahey S, et al. Alteration of endocrine parameters in premenopausal women with breast cancer during long-term adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen as the single agent. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991;83:1488–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mourits MJ, Devries EG, Ten Hoor KA, et al. Beware of amenorrhea during tamoxifen: it may be a wolf in sheep’s clothing. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3787–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, et al. Risk of menopause during the first year after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2365–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Petrek J, Naughton M, Case D, et al. Incidence, time course, and determinants of menstrual bleeding after breast cancer treatment: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1045–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Berliere M, Duhoux FP, Dalenc F, et al. Tamoxifen and ovarian function. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66616.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bellet M, Gray KP, Francis PA et al. Estrogen levels in premenopausal (prem) patients (pts) with hormone-receptor positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC) receiving adjuvant triptorelin (Trip) plus exemestane (E) or tamoxifen (T) in the SOFT trial: SOFT-EST substudy. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32:5s(suppl; abstr 585)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1707–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Antonini N, Jones H, Horiot JC, et al. Effect of age and radiation dose on local control after breast conserving treatment: EORTC trial 22881–10882. Radiother Oncol. 2007;82(3):265–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Li Y, Moran MS, Huo Q, et al. Post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer patients with t1-t2 and 1–3 positive lymph nodes: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81765.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stroud JS, Mutch D, Rader J, et al. Effects of cancer treatment on ovarian function. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(2):417–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Resetkova N, Hayashi M, Kolp LA, et al. Fertility preservation for prepubertal girls: update and current challenges. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2013;2(4):218–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Partridge A, Gelber S, Gelber RD, et al. Age of menopause among women who remain premenopausal following treatment for early breast cancer: long-term results from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials V and VI. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1646–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Walshe JM, Denduluri N, Swain SM. Amenorrhea in premenopausal women after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5769–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Anderson RA, Cameron DA. Pretreatment serum anti-mullerian hormone predicts long-term ovarian function and bone mass after chemotherapy for early breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:1336–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ruddy KJ, O’Neill A, Miller KD, et al. Biomarker prediction of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea in premenopausal women with breast cancer participating in E5103. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144(3):591–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chai J, Howie AF, Cameron DA, et al. A highly-sensitive anti-Müllerian hormone assay improves analysis of ovarian function following chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(14):2367–74.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, et al. The number of antral follicles in normal women with proven fertility is the best reflection of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:700–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Canada AL, Schover LR. The psychosocial impact of interrupted childbearing in long-term female cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2012;21(2):134–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gorman JR, Malcarne VL, Roesch SC, et al. Depressive symptoms among young breast cancer survivors: the importance of reproductive concerns. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(2):477–85.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Schwerdtfeger KL, Shreffler KM. Trauma of pregnancy loss and infertility for mothers and involuntarily childless women in the contemporary United States. J Loss Trauma. 2009;14(3):211–27.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Millheiser LS, Helmer AE, Quintero RB, et al. Is infertility a risk factor for female sexual dysfunction? A case-control study. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2022–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rosen A. Third-party reproduction and adoption in cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;34:91–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Schover LR, Rybicki LA, Martin BA, et al. Having children after cancer: a pilot survey of survivors’ attitudes and experiences. Cancer. 1999;86:697–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Quinn G, Vadaparampil S, Wilson C, et al. Attitudes of high-risk women toward preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Oktay K, Kim JY, Barad D, et al. Association of BRCA1 mutations with occult primary ovarian insufficiency: a possible explanation for the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:240–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang ET, Pisarska MD, Bresee C, et al. BRCA1 germline mutations may be associated with reduced ovarian reserve. Steril. 2014. pii: S0015-0282(14)2073-1.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Valentini A, Finch A, Lubinski J, et al. Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in patients with breast cancer with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3914–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kotsopoulos J, Librach CL, Lubinski J, et al. Infertility, treatment of infertility, and the risk of breast cancer among women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: a case-control study. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(10):1111–9. doi:10.1007/s10552-008-9175-0. Epub 2008 May 29.

  62. Noble R, Bahadur G, Iqbal M, et al. Pandora's box: ethics of PGD for inherited risk of late-onset disorders. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17 Suppl 3:55–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hurley K, Rubin LR, Werner-Lin A, et al. Incorporating information regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis into discussions concerning testing and risk management for BRCA1/2 mutations: a qualitative study of patient preferences. Cancer. 2012;118(24):6270–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Donnelly LS, Watson M, Moynihan C, et al. Reproductive decision-making in young female carriers of a BRCA mutation. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(4):1006–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). United States Medical Eligibility Criteria (US MEC) for contraceptive use, 2010. Cited 2013-12-16. http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/unintendedpregnancy/usmec.htm

  66. Dinger J, Bardenheuer K, Minh TD. Levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices and the risk of breast cancer. Contraception. 2011;83:211–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Schwarz EB, Hess R, Trussell J. Contraception for cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:S401e6.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Trinh XB, Tjalma WAA, Makar AP, et al. Use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in breast cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:17–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Casey PM, Faubion SS, MacLaughlin KL, et al. Caring for the breast cancer survivor's health and well-being. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5(4):693–704.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. World Health Organization. Medical Eligibility Criteria for contraceptive use. Cited 2013-12-16. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241562668.pdf.

  71. Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:555–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Cibula D, Zikan M, Dusek L, et al. Oral contraceptives and risk of ovarian and breast cancers in BRCA mutation carriers: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2011;11(8):1197–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Nieman CL, Kazer R, Brannigan RE, et al. Cancer survivors and infertility: a review of a new problem and novel answers. J Support Oncol. 2006;4:171–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Debono DJ, Kohnke JM, Helft PR. Addressing fertility in patients with advanced cancer: how the quality oncology practice initiative standards and ASCO guidelines facilitate ethical communication. J Oncol Pract. 2009;5(6):298–300.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Luyckx V, Durant JF, Camboni A, et al. Is transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue from patients with advanced-stage breast cancer safe? A pilot study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(10):1289–99.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. McNees P. Technology application to assist young survivors with fertility concerns. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2009;25(4):284–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivia Pagani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rossi, L., Pagani, O. (2015). Impact of Breast Cancer Treatment on Fertility. In: Biglia, N., Peccatori, F. (eds) Breast Cancer, Fertility Preservation and Reproduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17278-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17278-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17277-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17278-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics