Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

TQM and Innovation: Controversial Issues Surrounding the Impact of Formalization over Radical Innovation

  • Chapter
Achieving Competitive Advantage through Quality Management

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to better understand the influence of total quality management (TQM) practices on innovation, examining the conflicting issues that surround the impact of process management implementation and the effects of subsequent formalization on radical innovation. We consider several arguments that appear in the literature, as well as empirical research findings on this topic, discussing how TQM can stimulate a context that favors innovation, putting all the experience and competences of the firm at the service of innovation goals, or conversely, considering the potential barriers that process management and formalization can build against radical innovation. An extensive review of the literature leads us to conclude that appropriately applied TQM, and particularly process management, is capable of fostering incremental innovation and does not hamper radical innovation, although consideration must be given to adapting TQM programs to particular circumstances, such as uncertain and rapidly changing environments. Further research is needed to garner a more comprehensive understanding of the complexity of leadership decision-making in terms of change and adaptation, as well as the role of possible mediating factors in the relationship between TQM and innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abernathy, W. J. (1978). The productivity dilemma: RoadBlock to innovation in the automobile industry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S. (1991). Workers and flexible manufacturing systems: Three installations compared. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(5), 447–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S., Benner, M., Brunner, D. J., MacDuffie, J. P., Osono, E., Staats, B. R., et al. (2009). Perspectives on the productivity dilemma. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (2000). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., Rungtusanatham, M., & Schroeder, R. G. (1994). A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 472–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1994). Good communication that blocks learning. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J. (2009). Dynamic or static capabilities? Process management practices and response to technological change. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 676–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2003). Exploitation, exploration and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossink, B. A. G. (2002). The strategic function of quality in the management of innovation. Total Quality Management, 13(2), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bou-Lusar, J. C., Escrig-Tena, A. B., Roca-Puig, V., & Beltran-Martin, I. (2009). An empirical assessment of the EFQM excellence model evaluation as a TQM framework relative to the MBNQA model. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D. E., & Lawler, E. E., III. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how and when. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Chang, H., Chi, H., Chen, M., & Deng, L. (2012). How do established firms improve radical innovation performance? The organizational capabilities view. Technovation, 32, 441–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colman, R. (2002). Shifting into high gear: Honda Canada drives process innovation with its employees. California Management Review, 76(7), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall, NJ: Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. W., & Bowen, D. E. (1994). Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. The Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 392–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. W., & Evans, J. R. (1994). Total quality: Management organization and strategy. St Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1993). The new economics. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Advanced Engineering Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidt, C. M. (1992). Applying quality to R&D means learn as you go. Research Technology Management, 35(4), 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Marques, M., & Moreno-Luzon, M. D. (2013). Driving human resources towards quality and innovation in a highly competitive environment. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 839–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1995). Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation. Engineering Management, 43(3), 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, D. H., & Hundt, A. S. (1995). Findings of innovation research applied to quality management. Health Care Management Review, 20(2), 6–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (1995). Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual and practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 309–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harari, O. (1993). The eleventh reason why TQM doesn’t work. Management Review, 82(5), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, A., Tomczak, T., & Befurt, R. (2006). Determinants of radical product innovations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(1), 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, D. T., Igel, B., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2006). The impact of total quality management on innovation: Findings from a developing country. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(8/9), 1092–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, M. (1992). Solving quality problems using common sense. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 9(5), 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (1997). The performance effects of process management techniques. Management Science, 43(4), 522–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2005). Innovation and human resource management fit: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 26(4), 364–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. Y., Kumarb, V., & Kumarb, U. (2012). Relationship between quality management practices and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 30, 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kmieciak, R., Michna, A., & Meczynska, A. (2012). Innovativeness, empowerment and IT capability: Evidence from SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(5), 707–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, P. D., & Sinha, A. (1995). The TQM impact: A study of quality managers’ perceptions. Quality Management Journal, 2(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. S. M., & Anderson, C. A. (1998). A three-dimensional perspective of total quality management. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15(1), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. A. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., & Rajagopalan, S. (1998). Process improvement, quality, and learning effects. Management Science, 44(11), 1517–1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. (2006). Knowledge exploitation, knowledge exploration and competency trap. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 144–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorens Montes, F. J., Ruiz Moreno, A., & Garcia Morales, V. (2005). Influence of support leadership and teamwork cohesion on organizational learning, innovation and performance: An empirical examination. Technovation, 25(10), 1159–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, R. (2004). Knowledge creation and idea generation: A critical quality perspective. Technovation, 24(9), 697–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, R., Armstrong, G., & Kelly, B. (1998). Investigation of the relationship between total quality and innovation: A research study involving small organisations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(3), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Luzon, M. D., & Lloria, M. B. (2008). The role of non-structural and informal mechanisms of integration and coordination as forces in knowledge creation. British Journal of Management, 19(3), 250–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Luzon, M. D., & Valls-Pasola, J. (2011). Ambidexterity and quality management: Towards a research agenda. Management Decision, 49(6), 927–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Luzon, M. D., Gil-Marques, M., & Valls-Pasola, J. (2013). TQM, innovation and the role of cultural change. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(8), 1149–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moura, E. S. P., & Abrunhosa, A. (2007). The role of TQM practices in technological innovation: The Portuguese footwear industry case. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdomo-Ortiz, J., Gonzalez-Benito, J. Y., & Galendez, J. (2006). Total quality management as a forerunner of business innovation capability. Technovation, 26, 1170–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., & Hong, S. W. (2008). The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: A perspective from South Korean firms. Technovation, 28(12), 855–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2001). TQM and innovation: A literature review and research Framework. Technovation, 21(9), 539–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2003). The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(8), 901–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2004a). The multidimensionality of TQM practices in determining quality and innovation performance – An empirical examination. Technovation, 24, 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2004b). Transitioning from total quality management to total innovation management: An Australian case. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(8), 861–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, W. A. (1995). Navigating the journey to empowerment. Organizational Dynamics, 23(4), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in tehoptical dick industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainio, L. M., Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2012). Constituents of radical innovation-exploring the role of strategic orientations and market uncertainty. Technovation, 32, 591–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sale, K. (1980). Human scale. New York, NY: Coward, McCann and Geoghegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaha, H. E. (1996). Overcoming the TQM barrier to innovation. HR Magazine, 41(6), 144–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, D., & Terziovski, M. (1999). The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Vijande, M. L., & Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I. (2007). Innovativeness and organizational innovation in total quality oriented firms: The moderating role of market turbulence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauermann, H. (2004). Two sides of the same coin–An integrated model of motivational and informational control processes. Durhan, NC: Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Schroeder, R. G. (1994). Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 537–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1998). Customer-led and market-oriented: Let’s not confuse the two. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 1001–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing Innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Wiley: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2013). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (5th ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. L., & Gebhardt, J. E. (1992). Quality in action: 93 lessons in leadership, participation, and measurement. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Panne, G., Van Beers, C., & Kleinknecht, A. (2003). Success and failure of innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(03), 309–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zairi, M. (1994). Innovation or innovativeness? Results of a benchmarking study. Total Quality Management, 5(3), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Catholic University of Valencia, C/Corona 34, Valencia, 46003, Valencia, Spain

    María Gil-Marques

  2. Department of Management, University of Valencia, Av/dels Tarongers s/n, Valencia, 46022, Valencia, Spain

    María D. Moreno-Luzon

Authors
  1. María Gil-Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. María D. Moreno-Luzon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Gil-Marques .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, Universitat Politècnica de València, Departamento de organización de Empresas, Valencia, Spain

    Marta Peris-Ortiz

  2. Departamento de Economia Financiera y Contabilidad, Facultad de Estudios Empresariales y Turismo; Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain

    José Álvarez-García

  3. Department of Business Administration, Universitat Politècnica de València, Departamento de organización de Empresas, Valencia, Spain

    Carlos Rueda-Armengot

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gil-Marques, M., Moreno-Luzon, M.D. (2015). TQM and Innovation: Controversial Issues Surrounding the Impact of Formalization over Radical Innovation. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Álvarez-García, J., Rueda-Armengot, C. (eds) Achieving Competitive Advantage through Quality Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17251-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation