Skip to main content

Abstract

Interventional radiologists (IR) play an important role in the acquisition of tissue for pathologic diagnosis with the use of image-guided percutaneous techniques. Tissue samples can be collected using image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB), while cells can be acquired for cytology using image-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) is the gold standard for diagnostic tissue characterization as it has reduced morbidity while maintaining high specificity and sensitivity relative to surgical excision. Fluid collections including abscesses, effusions, empyemas, and peri-organ fluid deposits are a common condition and can be diagnosed and managed using image-guided minimally invasive methods. Image-guided aspiration and drainage of fluid collections reduces complications from blind aspiration and drainage and has lower morbidity than surgical drainage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Rose SC. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:969–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vijayaraghavan GR, David S, Bermudez-Allende M, Sarwat H. Imaging-guided parenchymal liver biopsy: how we do it. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2011;1:30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Adiga S, Athreya S. Safety, efficacy, and feasibility of an ultra-low dose radiation protocol for CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of pulmonary lesions: initial experience. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(7):709–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wallace MJ, Chin KW, Fletcher TB, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous drainage/aspiration of abscess and fluid collections. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:431–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorenz J, Thomas JL. Complications of percutaneous fluid drainage. Semin Interv Radiol. 2006;23(2):194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Allen BC, Barnhart H, Bashir M, Nieman C, Breault S, Jaffe TA. Diagnostic accuracy of intra-abdominal fluid collection characterized in the era of multidetector computed tomography. Am Surg. 2012;78(2):185–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta Radiol. 1953;39(5):368–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Winokur RS, Pua BB, Sullivan BW, Madoff DC. Percutaneous lung biopsy: technique, efficacy and complications. Semin Interv Radiol. 2013;30(2):121–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lazar Milovanovic BASc, MD Candidate .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Milovanovic, L. (2016). Biopsy and Drainage. In: Athreya, S. (eds) Demystifying Interventional Radiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17238-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17238-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17237-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17238-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics