Skip to main content

Towards a Negotiatory Ideal? Contractualization of Family Law in Finland

  • Chapter
  • 907 Accesses

Part of the book series: Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law ((GSCL,volume 4))

Abstract

This chapter offers an overview of contractual arrangements and agreements in family matters in Finland. Finnish law does not offer much scope for personal autonomy regarding status relations, and contractual options in substantive family law are mostly focused on financial issues like matrimonial property and maintenance. However, there are some noteworthy exceptions regarding paternity, adoption and filiation. The legislation on assisted reproduction, for instance, recognizes consent to treatment as a possible foundation for filiation.

While contractual options in substantive family law are rather scarce, procedurally speaking there is more room for agreement. The number of options for mediation and negotiation has increased greatly in the last few decades, beginning with legislative reforms in the 1980s. Thus the contrast between substantive and procedural family law suggests a shift away from status-based and financial provisions, towards a negotiation-based model of regulating families. Such a model also emphasizes the best interests of the child, and presumes that divorcing spouses will reach an agreement and share parental responsibilities after divorce.

I would like to thank Kirsikka Salminen and Riikka Koulu for their comments on this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All legislation and case law referred in this chapter is available on the internet at http://www.finlex.fi/ [10.10.2014]. Some of the databases can be browsed in English and translations of key acts and decrees are available in several languages.

  2. 2.

    The ombudsman institution also provides important oversight of legality and constitutionality; see eg. the jubilee book Parliamentary Ombudsman 90, and Kurki-Suonio 2010 in it.

  3. 3.

    The chapter is based on a large reform in the 1990s, and can be considered part of a larger shift in legal thinking and argumentation. See for instance Nieminen 2013.

  4. 4.

    A reform is being prepared in the Ministry of Justice as of autumn 2014; in all likelihood it will be limited in scope and will mainly help clarify the legal parenthood of children born to two women in a registered partnership (see also below in section “Partners”).

  5. 5.

    The new Act will enter into force on 1 January 2016. While the main content of the provisions will remain practically identical to those of the 1975 Act, there are controversial issues involved. One of them is the legal position of persons born before or during the transition period of 1976 to 1981, which was at hand in the ECtHR cases Grönmark v. Finland and Backlund v. Finland 6.7.2010.

  6. 6.

    The new Paternity Act will improve the parties' personal autonomy [etc]. For instance, acknowledgement of a child will become possible also before birth, when the parents visit a maternity clinic during pregnancy. This advance acknowledgement will be subject to a special revocation period of 30 days from birth.

  7. 7.

    The law also recognizes adoption within the family (step-parent adoption), in which a parent’s new spouse adopts the child as his or her own. In this case, only the relationship with the “outside” parent is dissolved.

  8. 8.

    During the marriage, this obligation is considered primary with regard to social security, though after divorce the assumption is effectively reversed.

  9. 9.

    In the following, the word “mediation” will be used as a generic term for any mechanisms and techniques that focus on achieving a sustainable arrangement or a solution to a conflict between two or more parties.

  10. 10.

    See government proposal HE 186/2013 vp. More information on the mediation process is available in a brochure by the Ministry of Justice, at http://www.oikeus.fi/en/index/esitteet/expert-assistedmediationofcustodydisputes_2.html [10.10.2014].

Case Law

European Court of Human Rights

Finnish Supreme Court

References

  • Aarnio A, Helin M (1992) Suomen avioliitto-oikeus. 3rd edn. Lakimiesliiton kustannus, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnio A, Kangas U (2008) Suomen jäämistöoikeus II. Testamenttioikeus. 4th edn. Talentum, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnio A, Kangas U (2010) Perhevarallisuusoikeus. 2nd edn. Talentum, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Boele-Woelki K, Ferrand F, Gonzáles Beilfuss C, Jänterä-Jareborg M, Lowe N, Martiny D, Pintens W (2007) Principles of European Family Law Regarding Parental Responsibilities. Intersentia, Antwerpen and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottberg E (1995) Perhe, elatus ja sosiaaliturva. Tutkimus yksityisen ja julkisen elatusvastuun rajoista, rakenteesta ja toimivuudesta. Turun yliopisto, Turku

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottberg E (2006) Huoltoriita ja lapsen asumiseen liittyvät kiireelliset ratkaisut. Defensor Legis 2006 p 955–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Helin M (2004) Perheoikeuden siveellinen luonne. Lakimies 2004 p 1244–1266

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola R (2002) Lapsen huolto- ja tapaamisoikeuspäätösten täytäntöönpano vuosina 1996–2001. Lakimies 2002 p 879–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaisto J, Oulasmaa P (1994) Lapsen elatus. Elatusavun vahvistaminen ja muuttaminen. Lakimiesliiton kustannus, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Koulu S (2013) Arranging Child Care: the Autonomy of the Changing Family. International Family Law and Practice 1 (2013) p 121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Koulu S (2014) Lapsen huolto- ja tapaamissopimukset. Oikeuden rakenteet ja sopivat perheet. Lakimiesliiton kustannus, Helsinki. Abstract available online at https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/135683

  • Kurki-Suonio K (2010) The Parliamentary Ombudsman as an overseer of the rights of the child. In: Parliamentary Ombudsman 90. Parliamentary Ombudsman, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavapuro J, Ojanen T, Scheinin M (2011) Rights-based constitutionalism in Finland and the development of pluralist constitutional review. International Journal of Constitutional Law (2011) 9 (2): 505–531. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mor035

  • Ministry of Justice Publications 2007:2. Ohje lapsen elatusavun suuruuden arvioimiseksi. Oikeusministeriön julkaisu 2007:2. Ministry of Justice, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen L (2013) Perus- ja ihmisoikeudet ja perhe. Talentum, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautiala M (1968) Avioliitto-oikeus. 4th edn. Suomen lakimiesliiton kustannus, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Swennen F (2013) Contractualisation of Family Law in Continental Europe. Familie & Recht 2013, juli-september. DOI: 10.5553/FenR/.000008

  • Telaranta K A (1957) Aviopuolisoiden välisistä sopimuksista. Lakimies 1957 p 33–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmsson T (1992) Critical Studies in Private Law. A treatise on need-rational principles in private law. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanna Koulu LLD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koulu, S. (2015). Towards a Negotiatory Ideal? Contractualization of Family Law in Finland. In: Swennen, F. (eds) Contractualisation of Family Law - Global Perspectives. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17229-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics