Abstract
This chapter offers an overview of contractual arrangements and agreements in family matters in Finland. Finnish law does not offer much scope for personal autonomy regarding status relations, and contractual options in substantive family law are mostly focused on financial issues like matrimonial property and maintenance. However, there are some noteworthy exceptions regarding paternity, adoption and filiation. The legislation on assisted reproduction, for instance, recognizes consent to treatment as a possible foundation for filiation.
While contractual options in substantive family law are rather scarce, procedurally speaking there is more room for agreement. The number of options for mediation and negotiation has increased greatly in the last few decades, beginning with legislative reforms in the 1980s. Thus the contrast between substantive and procedural family law suggests a shift away from status-based and financial provisions, towards a negotiation-based model of regulating families. Such a model also emphasizes the best interests of the child, and presumes that divorcing spouses will reach an agreement and share parental responsibilities after divorce.
I would like to thank Kirsikka Salminen and Riikka Koulu for their comments on this article.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
All legislation and case law referred in this chapter is available on the internet at http://www.finlex.fi/ [10.10.2014]. Some of the databases can be browsed in English and translations of key acts and decrees are available in several languages.
- 2.
The ombudsman institution also provides important oversight of legality and constitutionality; see eg. the jubilee book Parliamentary Ombudsman 90, and Kurki-Suonio 2010 in it.
- 3.
The chapter is based on a large reform in the 1990s, and can be considered part of a larger shift in legal thinking and argumentation. See for instance Nieminen 2013.
- 4.
A reform is being prepared in the Ministry of Justice as of autumn 2014; in all likelihood it will be limited in scope and will mainly help clarify the legal parenthood of children born to two women in a registered partnership (see also below in section “Partners”).
- 5.
The new Act will enter into force on 1 January 2016. While the main content of the provisions will remain practically identical to those of the 1975 Act, there are controversial issues involved. One of them is the legal position of persons born before or during the transition period of 1976 to 1981, which was at hand in the ECtHR cases Grönmark v. Finland and Backlund v. Finland 6.7.2010.
- 6.
The new Paternity Act will improve the parties' personal autonomy [etc]. For instance, acknowledgement of a child will become possible also before birth, when the parents visit a maternity clinic during pregnancy. This advance acknowledgement will be subject to a special revocation period of 30 days from birth.
- 7.
The law also recognizes adoption within the family (step-parent adoption), in which a parent’s new spouse adopts the child as his or her own. In this case, only the relationship with the “outside” parent is dissolved.
- 8.
During the marriage, this obligation is considered primary with regard to social security, though after divorce the assumption is effectively reversed.
- 9.
In the following, the word “mediation” will be used as a generic term for any mechanisms and techniques that focus on achieving a sustainable arrangement or a solution to a conflict between two or more parties.
- 10.
See government proposal HE 186/2013 vp. More information on the mediation process is available in a brochure by the Ministry of Justice, at http://www.oikeus.fi/en/index/esitteet/expert-assistedmediationofcustodydisputes_2.html [10.10.2014].
Case Law
European Court of Human Rights
Hokkanen v. Finland 23.9.1994
Backlund v. Finland 6.7.2010
Grönmark v. Finland 6.7.2010
Schneider v. Germany 15.9.2011
Finnish Supreme Court
KKO 1984 II 71 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/1984/19840071t, in Finnish)
KKO 1984 II 141 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/1984/19840141t, in Finnish)
KKO 1995:195 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/1995/19950195, in Finnish)
KKO 1996:29 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/1996/19960029, in Finnish)
KKO 2002:46 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/2002/20020046, in Finnish)
KKO 2005:60 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/2005/20050060, in Finnish)
KKO 2009:11 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/2009/20090011, in Finnish)
KKO 2010:16 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/2010/20100016, in Finnish)
KKO 2011:11 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/2011/20110011, in Finnish)
KKO 2011:106 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/2011/20110106, in Finnish)
KKO 2012:11 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/2012/20120011, in Finnish)
KKO 2012:95 (available digitally at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/oikeus/kko/kko/2012/20120095, in Finnish)
References
Aarnio A, Helin M (1992) Suomen avioliitto-oikeus. 3rd edn. Lakimiesliiton kustannus, Helsinki
Aarnio A, Kangas U (2008) Suomen jäämistöoikeus II. Testamenttioikeus. 4th edn. Talentum, Helsinki
Aarnio A, Kangas U (2010) Perhevarallisuusoikeus. 2nd edn. Talentum, Helsinki
Boele-Woelki K, Ferrand F, Gonzáles Beilfuss C, Jänterä-Jareborg M, Lowe N, Martiny D, Pintens W (2007) Principles of European Family Law Regarding Parental Responsibilities. Intersentia, Antwerpen and Oxford
Gottberg E (1995) Perhe, elatus ja sosiaaliturva. Tutkimus yksityisen ja julkisen elatusvastuun rajoista, rakenteesta ja toimivuudesta. Turun yliopisto, Turku
Gottberg E (2006) Huoltoriita ja lapsen asumiseen liittyvät kiireelliset ratkaisut. Defensor Legis 2006 p 955–970
Helin M (2004) Perheoikeuden siveellinen luonne. Lakimies 2004 p 1244–1266
Jaakkola R (2002) Lapsen huolto- ja tapaamisoikeuspäätösten täytäntöönpano vuosina 1996–2001. Lakimies 2002 p 879–901
Kaisto J, Oulasmaa P (1994) Lapsen elatus. Elatusavun vahvistaminen ja muuttaminen. Lakimiesliiton kustannus, Helsinki
Koulu S (2013) Arranging Child Care: the Autonomy of the Changing Family. International Family Law and Practice 1 (2013) p 121–128
Koulu S (2014) Lapsen huolto- ja tapaamissopimukset. Oikeuden rakenteet ja sopivat perheet. Lakimiesliiton kustannus, Helsinki. Abstract available online at https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/135683
Kurki-Suonio K (2010) The Parliamentary Ombudsman as an overseer of the rights of the child. In: Parliamentary Ombudsman 90. Parliamentary Ombudsman, Helsinki
Lavapuro J, Ojanen T, Scheinin M (2011) Rights-based constitutionalism in Finland and the development of pluralist constitutional review. International Journal of Constitutional Law (2011) 9 (2): 505–531. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mor035
Ministry of Justice Publications 2007:2. Ohje lapsen elatusavun suuruuden arvioimiseksi. Oikeusministeriön julkaisu 2007:2. Ministry of Justice, Helsinki
Nieminen L (2013) Perus- ja ihmisoikeudet ja perhe. Talentum, Helsinki
Rautiala M (1968) Avioliitto-oikeus. 4th edn. Suomen lakimiesliiton kustannus, Helsinki
Swennen F (2013) Contractualisation of Family Law in Continental Europe. Familie & Recht 2013, juli-september. DOI: 10.5553/FenR/.000008
Telaranta K A (1957) Aviopuolisoiden välisistä sopimuksista. Lakimies 1957 p 33–82
Wilhelmsson T (1992) Critical Studies in Private Law. A treatise on need-rational principles in private law. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koulu, S. (2015). Towards a Negotiatory Ideal? Contractualization of Family Law in Finland. In: Swennen, F. (eds) Contractualisation of Family Law - Global Perspectives. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17229-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17229-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17228-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17229-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)