Skip to main content

A New Distribution Mapping Technique for Climate Model Bias Correction

  • Conference paper

Abstract

We evaluate the performance of different distribution mapping techniques for bias correction of climate model output by operating on synthetic data and comparing the results to an “oracle” correction based on perfect knowledge of the generating distributions. We find results consistent across six different metrics of performance. Techniques based on fitting a distribution perform best on data from normal and gamma distributions, but are at a significant disadvantage when the data does not come from a known parametric distribution. The technique with the best overall performance is a novel nonparametric technique, kernel density distribution mapping (KDDM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashfaq M et al (2010) Influence of climate model biases and daily-scale temperature and precipitation events on hydrological impacts assessment. JGR 115:D14116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boé J et al (2007) Statistical and dynamical downscaling of the Seine basin climate for hydro-meteorological studies. Int J Climatol 27:1643–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsson L (2014) qmap: statistical transformations for post-processing climate model output. R package version 1.0-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsson L et al (2012) Technical note: downscaling RCM precipitation to the station scale using statistical transformations – a comparison of methods. HESS 16:3383–3390. doi:10.5194/hess-16-3383-2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Haerter JO et al (2011) Climate model bias correction and the role of timescales. HESS 15:1065–1079. doi:10.5194/hess-15-1065-2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Iizumi T et al (2011) Evaluation and intercomparison of downscaled daily precipitation indices over Japan in present day climate. JGR 116:D01111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ines AVM, Hansen JW (2006) Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies. Agr Forest Meteorol 138:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson F, Sharma A (2011) Accounting for interannual variability: a comparison of options for water resources climate change impacts assessments. WRR 47:W045508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer EP et al (2002) A long-term hydrologically-based data set of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J Climate 15(22):3237–3251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns LO et al (2007, updated 2013) The North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program dataset. National Center for Atmospheric Research Earth System Grid data portal, Boulder, CO. Data downloaded 2012-03-23. doi:10.5065/D6RN35ST

  • Mearns LO et al (2009) A regional climate change assessment program for North America. Eos Trans AGU 90(36):311–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky HA, Brier GW (1968) Some applications of statistics to meteorology. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, pp 40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Piani C et al (2010) Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe. Theor Appl Climatol 99:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/

  • Stoner A et al (2012) An asynchronous regional regression model for statistical downscaling of daily climate variables. Int J Climatol 33(11):2473–2494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teutschbein C, Seibert J (2012) Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies. J Hydrol 456–457:11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL et al (2014) The Statistical DownScaling Model – Decision Centric (SDSM-DC): conceptual basis and applications. Clim Res 61:251–268. doi:10.3354/cr01254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood AW et al (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim Change 62:189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Anne Stoner for providing a very helpful review of our implementation of the ARRM algorithm that corrected some errors. Thanks also to Dorit Hammerling and Ian Scott-Fleming for helpful comments on drafts of the paper. This research was supported by the NSF Earth Systems Models (EaSM) Program award number 1049208, and by the DoD Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) under project RC-2204.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth McGinnis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

McGinnis, S., Nychka, D., Mearns, L.O. (2015). A New Distribution Mapping Technique for Climate Model Bias Correction. In: Lakshmanan, V., Gilleland, E., McGovern, A., Tingley, M. (eds) Machine Learning and Data Mining Approaches to Climate Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17220-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics