Skip to main content

Abstract

The climatology of thunderstorms is an important weather forecasting tool and aids in improved predictability of thunderstorms (Schneider and Dean, A comprehensive 5-year severe storm environment climatology for the continental united states. In: 24th conference on severe local storms, Savannah. American Meteorological Society, p 16A.4, 2008). However, deriving such a climatology from observations of severe weather events is subject to demographic bias (Paruk and Blackwell, Natl Weather Dig 19(1):27–33, 1994), and this bias can be ameliorated by the use of remotely sensed observations to create climatologies (Cintineo et al., Weather Forecast 27:1235–1248, 2012). In this paper, we describe a fully automated method of identifying, tracking, and clustering thunderstorms to extract such a climatology and demonstrate it by deriving the climatology of thunderstorm initiations over the continental United States. The identification is based on the extended watershed algorithm of Lakshmanan et al. (J Atmos Ocean Technol 26(3):523–537, 2009), the tracking based on the greedy optimization method suggested in Lakshmanan and Smith (Weather Forecast 25(2):721–729, 2010), and the clustering is the Theil-Sen clustering method introduced in Lakshmanan et al. (J Appl Meteorol Clim 54:451–462, 2014). This method was employed on radar data collected across the conterminous United States for the year 2010 in order to determine the location of all thunderstorm initiations that year. Eighty-one percent of all thunderstorm initiation points occurred in the spring and summer months and were widely dispersed across all states. The remaining 19 % occurred in the fall and winter months, and a majority of these points were spatially dispersed across the southern half of the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen JT, Karoly DJ, Mills GA (2011) A severe thunderstorm climatology for australia and associated thunderstorm environments. Aust Meteorol Oceanogr J 61(3):143–158. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/32768

  • Augustine J, Howard K (1988) Mesoscale convective complexes over the United States during 1985. Mon Weather Rev 116(3):685–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin SG, Dévényi D, Weygandt S, Brundage KJ, Brown JM, Grell GA, Kim D, Schwartz BE, Smirnova TG, Smith TL (2004) An hourly assimilation-forecast cycle: The RUC. Mon Weather Rev 132:495–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beucher S (1982) Watersheds of functions and picture segmentation. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, Paris, pp 1928–1931

    Google Scholar 

  • Beucher S, Lantuejoul C (1979) Use of watersheds in contour detection. In: Proceedings international workshop image processing, real-time edge and motion detection/estimation, Rennes

    Google Scholar 

  • Brimelow JC, Reuter GW, Bellon A, Hudak D (2004) A radar-based methodology for preparing a severe thunderstorm climatology in central alberta. Atmos-Ocean 42(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun KM, Carey LD, Filiaggi MT, Ortega KL, Schultz CJ, Stumpf GJ (2013) Implementation and initial evaluation of a real-time lightning jump algorithm for operational use. In: 6th conference on the meteorological applications of lightning data, Austin. American Meteorological Society, p 743

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronis T, Schultz CJ, Schultz EV, Carey LD, Calhoun KM, Kingfield DM, Ortega KL, Filiaggi MT, Stumpf GJ, Stano GT, Goodman S (2014) National demonstration and evaluation of a real time lightning jump algorithm for operational use. In: 26th conference on weather analysis and forecasting/22nd conference on numerical weather prediction, Atlanta. American Meteorological Society, p 4B.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Cintineo J, Smith T, Lakshmanan V, Brooks H, Ortega K (2012) An objective high-resolution hail climatology of the contiguous united states. Weather Forecast 27:1235–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon M, Wiener G (1993) TITAN: thunderstorm identification, tracking, analysis and nowcasting – a radar-based methodology. J Atmos Ocean Technol 10:785–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dye JE, Win WP, Jones JJ, Breed W (1989) The electrification of New Mexico thunderstorms. Part I: relationship between precipitation development and the onset of electrification. J Geophys Res 94:8643–8656

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene DR, Clark RA (1972) Vertically integrated liquid water – a new analysis tool. Mon Weather Rev 100:548–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gremillion MS, Orville RE (1999) Thunderstorm characteristics of cloud-to-ground lightning at the Kennedy space center, Florida: a study of lightning initiation signatures as indicated by the WSR-88D. Weather Forecast 14:640–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han L, Fu S, Zhao L, Zheng Y, Wang H, Lin Y (2009) 3D convective storm identification, tracking and forecasting – an enchanced TITAN algorithm. J Atmos Ocean Technol 26:719–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson A, Lakshmanan V, Smith T, Richman M (2012) An automated technique to categorize storm type from radar and near-storm environment data. Atmos Res 111(7):104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J, MacKeen P, Witt A, Mitchell E, Stumpf G, Eilts M, Thomas K (1998) The storm cell identification and tracking algorithm: an enhanced WSR-88D algorithm. Weather Forecast 13:263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan V, Smith T (2009) Data mining storm attributes from spatial grids. J Atmos Ocean Technol 26(11):2353–2365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan V, Smith T (2010) An objective method of evaluating and devising storm tracking algorithms. Weather Forecast 25(2):721–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan V, Rabin R, DeBrunner V (2003) Multiscale storm identification and forecast. J Atmos Res 67:367–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan V, Fritz A, Smith T, Hondl K, Stumpf GJ (2007a) An automated technique to quality control radar reflectivity data. J Appl Meteorol 46(3):288–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan V, Smith T, Stumpf GJ, Hondl K (2007b) The warning decision support system – integrated information. Weather Forecast 22(3):596–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan V, Hondl K, Rabin R (2009) An efficient, general-purpose technique for identifying storm cells in geospatial images. J Atmos Ocean Technol 26(3):523–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan V, Herzog B, Kingfield D (2015) A method of extracting post-event storm tracks. J Appl Meteorol Clim 54:451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang TJ, Rutledge SA (2011) A framework for the statistical analysis of large radar and lightning datasets: results from STEPS 2000. Mon Weather Rev 139:2536–2551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock NA, Houston AL (2013) Empirical examination of the factors regulating thunderstorm initiation. Mon Weather Rev 142(1):240–258. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-13-00082.1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00082.1

  • MacGorman DR, Rust WD (1998) The electrical nature of storms. Oxford University Press. ISBN:978-0195073379

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath K, Jones T, Snow J (2002) Increasing the usefulness of a mesocyclone climatology. In: 21st conference on severe local storms, San Antonio. American Meteorological Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel C, Orain F, Senesi S (1997) Automated detection and characterization of MCS using the meteosat infrared channel. In: Proceedings of the meteorological satellite data users conference, Eumetsat, Brussels, pp 213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega KL, Smith TM, Zhang J, Langston C, Qi Y, Stevens S, Tate JE (2012) The multi-year reanalysis of remotely sensed storms (MYRORSS) project. In: 26th conference on severe local storms, Nashville. American Meteorological Society, p 74

    Google Scholar 

  • Paruk BJ, Blackwell SR (1994) A severe thunderstorm climatology for alberta. Natl Weather Dig 19(1):27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Roerdink J, Meijster A (2001) The watershed transform: definitions, algorithms and parallelization strategies. Fundamenta Informaticae 41(3):187–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider R, Dean AR (2008) A comprehensive 5-year severe storm environment climatology for the continental united states. In: 24th conference on severe local storms, Savannah. American Meteorological Society, p 16A.4

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BT, Thompson RL, Grams JS, Broyles C, Brooks HE (2012) Convective modes for significant severe thunderstorms in the contiguous united states. Part I: storm classification and climatology. Weather Forecast 27(5):1114–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BT, Castellanos TE, Winters AC, Mead CM, Dean AR, Thompson RL (2013) Measured severe convective wind climatology and associated convective modes of thunderstorms in the contiguous United States, 2003–09. Weather Forecast 28(1):229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf G, Smith S, Kelleher K (2005) Collaborative activities of the NWS MDL and NSSL to improve and develop new multiple-sensor severe weather warning guidance applications. In: Preprints, 21st international conference on interactive information and processing systems (IIPS) for meteorology, oceanography, and hydrology, San Diego. American Meteorological Society, p P2.13

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapp J, Tessendorf S, Godfrey E, Brooks H (2005) Tornadoes from squall lines and bow echoes. Part I: climatological distribution. Weather Forecast 20(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent BR, Carey LD, Schneider D, Keeter K, Gonski R (2003) Using WSR-88D reflectivity data for the prediction of cloud-to-ground lightning: a North Carolina study. Natl Weather Dig 27:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J, Crook NA, Mueller CK, Sun JZ, Dixon M (1998) Nowcasting thunderstorms: a status report. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:2079–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Benjamin Herzog for his contributions in the development of the Theil-Sen clustering algorithm, Kristin Calhoun for advice and helpful discussions regarding convective initiation and lightning, and Kiel Ortega for his development work on the MYRORSS project. Funding for this research was provided under NOAA-OU Cooperative Agreement NA17RJ1227. The storm identification (extended watershed algorithm), tracking, and Theil-Sen clustering algorithms described in this paper have been implemented within the Warning Decision Support System Integrated Information (WDSSII; Lakshmanan et al. 2007b) as the w2segmotionll and w2besttrack algorithms. WDSS-II is available for download at www.wdssii.org.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valliappa Lakshmanan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lakshmanan, V., Kingfield, D. (2015). Extracting the Climatology of Thunderstorms. In: Lakshmanan, V., Gilleland, E., McGovern, A., Tingley, M. (eds) Machine Learning and Data Mining Approaches to Climate Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17220-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics