Abstract
Given the complexities and unknowns of coastal and marine futures, scenario analysis using a ‘Delphi process’ can help to explore expert views and assemble them into consistent ‘best guesses’ of alternative futures. This chapter presents five scenarios consisting of descriptions of different societal organisation in relation to (i) the importance of market forces (versus other methods of resource allocation) and (ii) the dominant level of environmental government (from local through national to supranational). Experts reviewed how marine ecosystem services in UK regions would alter by 2060 under projected macroeconomic conditions and climate change in these scenarios, and how the services would respond to shocks (pulse disturbances) to the social-ecological system. The results suggest that it is important to sustain present trends in marine environmental management and implementation of European and national policies, whilst adoption of locally managed ‘soft engineering’ of coastlines, augmenting carbon sinks and improving the resilience of coastal ecosystems and communities to sea-level rise require further attention. In addition to these results, the process of reaching them is important: ‘mini-Delphi’ workshops (as illustrated here) can engage a community of experts with a complex set of interacting social-environmental issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bender, A., Case, T. J., & Gilpin, M. E. (1984). Perturbation experiments in community ecology; theory and practice. Ecology, 65, 1–13.
Bradley, S. L., Milne, G. A., Teferle, F. N., Bingley, R. M., & Orliac, E. J. (2009). Glacial isostatic adjustment of the British Isles: New constraints from GPS measurements of crustal motion. Geophysical Journal International, 178(1), 14–22.
Burns, C. (2013). The implications for UK environmental policy of a vote to exit the EU (9 pp). York: Friends of the Earth.
Clason, D. L., & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 34(4), 31–35.
Cooper, P., Etherington, L., Bell, S., Farmer, A., & Williams, J. (2008). Socio-economic scenarios of European development and integrated management of the marine environment (Working paper series, 2008.08, 53 pp). Bath: University of Bath, School of Management.
Cuhls, K. (2001). Foresight with Delphi surveys in Japan. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(4), 555–569.
Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion (RM-5888-PR, ix + 79 pp). Santa Barbara: RAND Corporation.
Donohoe, H. M. (2011). A Delphi toolkit for ecotourism research. Journal of Ecotourism, 10(1), 1–20.
Douglas, M. (1970). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Press.
Green, K. C., Armstrong, J. S., & Graefe, A. (2007). Methods to elicit forecasts from groups: Delphi and prediction markets compared. Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, 8, 17–20.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Reason and the rationalization of society, Vol. 1). Boston/Cambridge: Beacon Press/Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action (Lifeworld and system: A critique of fundamentalist reason, Vol. 2). Boston/Cambridge: Beacon Press/Polity Press.
Haines-Young, R., Paterson, J., Potschin, M., Wilson, A., & Kass, G. (2011). Chapter 25: The UK NEA scenarios: Development of storylines and analysis of outcomes. In The UK National Ecosystem Assessment technical report. UK National Ecosystem Assessment (pp. 1196–1264). Cambridge: United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC).
IPCC. (2007). In Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, & A. Reisinger (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (104 pp). Geneva: IPCC.
IPCC. (2013). Summary for policymakers. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, G. J., Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Lowe, J. A., Jones, P., & Kilsby, C. G. (2009). UK climate projections: Briefing report. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK (Version 2, 2010). Exeter: UK Meteorological Office Hadley Centre.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
Lowe, J. A., Howard, T. P., Pardaens, A., Tinker, J., Holt, J., Wakelin, S., Milne, G., Leake, J., Wolf, J., Horsburgh, K., Reeder, T., Jenkins, G., Ridley, J., Dye, S., & Bradley, S. (2009). UK Climate Projections science report: Marine and coastal projections. UKCP09 scientific reports, 95 pp. Exeter: UK Meteorological Office Hadley Centre.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Office of Budget Responsibility. (2012). Fiscal sustainability report (159 pp). Norwich: The Stationery Office.
Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 104, 15181–15187.
Ostrom, E. (2009). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. In K. Grandin (Ed.), The Nobel prizes 2009. Stockholm: Nobel Foundation.
Pahl, S., Sheppard, S., Boomsma, C., & Groves, C. (2014). Perceptions of time in relation to climate change. WIREs Climate Change. doi:10.1002/wcc.272.
Pinnegar, J. K., Viner, D., Hadley, D., Dye, S., Harris, M., Berkhout, F., & Simpson. M. (2006). Alternative future scenarios for marine ecosystems. Technical report, 109 pp. Lowestoft: CEFAS.
Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376–382.
UKCIP. (2000). Socio-economic scenarios for climate change impact assessment: A guide to their use in the UK Climate Impacts Programme (13 + 127 pp). Oxford: UK Climate Impacts Programme.
UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. (2014). The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on: Synthesis of the key findings. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC, LWEC.
Vigdor, J. (2008). The economic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(4), 135–154.
Wildavsky, A. (1987). Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Review, 81(1), 3–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tett, P., Mee, L. (2015). Scenarios Explored with Delphi. In: Turner, R., Schaafsma, M. (eds) Coastal Zones Ecosystem Services. Studies in Ecological Economics, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17214-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17214-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17213-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17214-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)