Skip to main content

Vehicle Orientated Initiatives for Improving the Environmental Performance of Urban Freight Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Greening of Industry Networks Studies ((GINS,volume 4))

Abstract

Freight vehicles contribute a substantial amount to the environmental impacts within cities. There are several emerging engine and alternative fuel technologies that have the potential to reduce the fossil fuel consumption as well as to improve the air quality within urban areas. Larger capacity vehicles allow more freight to be carried with less vehicles and can significantly reduce the amount of freight traffic and emissions. City Logistics schemes provide an opportunity for promoting innovative vehicle technologies. Partnerships between the public and private sectors can lead to solutions that lower the environmental and financial costs for freight transport. This chapter outlines a range of technologies and city logistics schemes that can improve the environmental performance of urban freight systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • BESTFACT. (2014). www.bestfact.net.

  • BESTUFS. (2007). Good practice guide on urban freight transport. Best urban freight solutions. Karlsruhe: PTV. www.bestufs.net.

  • Browne, M., Allen, J., Nemoto, T., Patier, D., & Visser, J. (2012). Reducing social and environmental impacts of urban freight transport: A review of some major cities. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M., Sweet, M., Woodburn, A., & Allen, J. (2005). Urban freight consolidation centers, final report. London: University of Westminster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester, M., & Horvath, A. (2007). Environmental life-cycle assessment of passenger transportation: A detailed methodology for energy, greenhouse gas and criteria pollutant inventories of automobiles, buses, light rail, heavy rail and air. Working Paper, UCB-ITS-VWP-2007-7, University of California, Berkeley Center for Future Urban Transport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester, M., & Horvath, A. (2009). Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains. Environmental Research Letters, 4, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Community. (2006). Keep Europe moving—Sustainable mobility for our continent. The Mid-Term Review of the European Commission’s 2001 Transport White Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dablanc, L. (2007). Goods transport in large European cities: Difficult to organize, difficult to modernize. Transportation Research Part A, 41, 280–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Christoforo, R., Blanksby, C., & Germanchev, A. (2006). Performance-based design of an innovative truck-trailer configuration, safer and more efficient distribution of liquid fuel in Australia. Transportation Research Record, 1966, 110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diziain, D., Taniguchi, E., & Dablanc, L. (2014). Urban logistics by rail and waterways in France and Japan. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, R. B., Greaves, S., & Hensher, D. A. (2013). Medium term effects of London’s low emission zone. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassall, K., & Thompson, R. G. (2011). Estimating the benefits of performance based standards vehicles. Transportation Research Record, 2224, 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassall, K., & Thompson, R.G. (2012). Determining productivity gains from performance-based standards vehicles in urban areas. In: Proceedings of 91st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January 22–26, 2012 (12-1887).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-Veras, J., Ozbay, K., Kornhauser, A. L., Brom, M., Iyer, S., Yushimito, W., et al. (2011). Overall impacts of off-hour delivery programs in the New York City metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record, 2238, 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuta, J., Ito, T., Tomiyama, I., Yamamoto, S., & Yamada, T. (2012). New subway-integrated city logistics system. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 476–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, J., Browne, M., & Allen, J. (2012). Before-after assessment of a logistics trial with clean urban freight vehicles: A case study in London. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 146–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J., & Vanelslander, T. (2012). The use of bicycle messengers in the logistics chain, concepts further revised. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 409–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSF. (2013). Improving freight system performance in metropolitan areas—NCFRP Project 38. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, CDM Smith, NYCDOT—HDR and University of Westminster, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • NTC. (2008). Performance based standards scheme—the standards and vehicle assessment rules, as at 10 November 2008 (incorporating all amendments consented to by the ATC up to that date). Melbourne: National Transport Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1995). Performance based standards for the road sector. OECD Report, OECD Paris. http://www.oecd.org/document/44/0,2340,en_2649_37433_35693996_1_1_1_37433,00.html.

  • OECD. (2003). Delivering the goods 21st century challenges to urban goods transport. OECD Report, OECD Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • PIARC. (2012). Public sector governance of urban freight transport. PIARC Technical Committee B.4, Freight Transport and Inter-Modality, World Road Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanburn, J. (2013, March 25). Deliver a fix for traffic jams, 10 big ideas in transportation. Time, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUGAR. (2011). SUGAR: sustainable urban goods logistics achieved by regional and local policies. City logistics best practices: a handbook for authorities, www.sugarlogistics.eu.

  • Taniguchi, E., Kawakatsu, S., & Tsuji, H. (2000). New co-operative system using electric vans for urban freight transport. In L. Sucharov & C. A. Brebbia (Eds.), Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century VI (pp. 201–210). Southampton, UK: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. G., & Taniguchi, E. (2014). Future directions. In City logistics—mapping the future. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell G. Thompson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, R.G. (2015). Vehicle Orientated Initiatives for Improving the Environmental Performance of Urban Freight Systems. In: Fahimnia, B., Bell, M., Hensher, D., Sarkis, J. (eds) Green Logistics and Transportation. Greening of Industry Networks Studies, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17181-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics